RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고구려 평양 장안성 출토 각자성석(刻字城石)의 축성 구간 검증 = The Gakja Seong-seok(刻字城石) relics excavated from the Pyeong’yang area’s Jang’an-seong vestige of Goguryeo - Examining information concerning the details of fortress construction -

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      From the Pyeong’yang-seong area, total of five Gakja Seong-seok relics have been found so far. Information extracted from these relics include the Ganji designation of the year the construction of the fortress began, name of the project’s supervisor, the length of fortress sections that were constructed. These are undoubtedly vital information in determining in what feature and how the Goguryeo dynasty built the Jang’an-seong fortress in Pyeong’yang.
      Most of the fortress walls are now gone, but there is a detailed map of the area created during the Japanese occupation period. In this study, the map is cross-referenced with Google Earth, and verification of the information on the Gakja Seong-seok relics is attempted, using data such as circumference or gross area.
      In case of relic No.1, which is generally understood to have been found near Otan, a description on that says “11 Ri(里) to the West” seems to be indicating that relic belonged to the South wall of the Middle (“Jungseong”) fortress. In case of relic No.2, which was found at the Hansa-jeong pavilion at the South side of the Jang’an-seong fortress, there is a line saying “12 Ri to the East.” Considering the length of the actual vestige, it seems like the Goguryeo people used a Cheok scale in which one Cheok was the equivalent of 35.6cm, and one ‘Ri’ equaled 1,000 Cheok units and not 1,800 Cheok units as has usually been considered to be the norm in East Asia. And that is because the latter equation, which would identify one Ri as 1,800 Cheok, would not fit the actual feature of the vestige, as either the Chinese Han-cheok(漢尺, =23cm) or the Goguryeo-cheok(=35.6cm) would not match what we have today if they were multiplied 1,800 times. Only the Goguryeo-cheok system, and when multiplied 1,000 times, would do.
      In the Inner (“Naeseong”) fortress, where relics No.4 and No.5 were found, it seems there were three separate construction segments, each of being 6 Ri and 400 cheok units in length. This finding enables us to make a more reasonable assessment of the contents of relic No.5, over which various opinions have been colliding with each other. Only five relics have been found so far, but it seems highly probable that there could have been one more in the Western segment of the Inner fortress, and another in the Southern segment of the Middle fortress. And considering the existence of the Northern (“Bukseong”) fortress, it seems like there would have been total of seven or eight Gakja Seong-seok markers when the Pyeong’yang area’s Jang’an-seong fortress was being constructed.
      번역하기

      From the Pyeong’yang-seong area, total of five Gakja Seong-seok relics have been found so far. Information extracted from these relics include the Ganji designation of the year the construction of the fortress began, name of the project’s supervis...

      From the Pyeong’yang-seong area, total of five Gakja Seong-seok relics have been found so far. Information extracted from these relics include the Ganji designation of the year the construction of the fortress began, name of the project’s supervisor, the length of fortress sections that were constructed. These are undoubtedly vital information in determining in what feature and how the Goguryeo dynasty built the Jang’an-seong fortress in Pyeong’yang.
      Most of the fortress walls are now gone, but there is a detailed map of the area created during the Japanese occupation period. In this study, the map is cross-referenced with Google Earth, and verification of the information on the Gakja Seong-seok relics is attempted, using data such as circumference or gross area.
      In case of relic No.1, which is generally understood to have been found near Otan, a description on that says “11 Ri(里) to the West” seems to be indicating that relic belonged to the South wall of the Middle (“Jungseong”) fortress. In case of relic No.2, which was found at the Hansa-jeong pavilion at the South side of the Jang’an-seong fortress, there is a line saying “12 Ri to the East.” Considering the length of the actual vestige, it seems like the Goguryeo people used a Cheok scale in which one Cheok was the equivalent of 35.6cm, and one ‘Ri’ equaled 1,000 Cheok units and not 1,800 Cheok units as has usually been considered to be the norm in East Asia. And that is because the latter equation, which would identify one Ri as 1,800 Cheok, would not fit the actual feature of the vestige, as either the Chinese Han-cheok(漢尺, =23cm) or the Goguryeo-cheok(=35.6cm) would not match what we have today if they were multiplied 1,800 times. Only the Goguryeo-cheok system, and when multiplied 1,000 times, would do.
      In the Inner (“Naeseong”) fortress, where relics No.4 and No.5 were found, it seems there were three separate construction segments, each of being 6 Ri and 400 cheok units in length. This finding enables us to make a more reasonable assessment of the contents of relic No.5, over which various opinions have been colliding with each other. Only five relics have been found so far, but it seems highly probable that there could have been one more in the Western segment of the Inner fortress, and another in the Southern segment of the Middle fortress. And considering the existence of the Northern (“Bukseong”) fortress, it seems like there would have been total of seven or eight Gakja Seong-seok markers when the Pyeong’yang area’s Jang’an-seong fortress was being constructed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 고려대학교박물관, "한국 고대의 Global Pride 고구려" 통천문화사 2005

      2 최희림, "평양성을 쌓은 년대와 규모" 1967

      3 손수호, "평양성, 고구려돌칸 흙무덤 발굴보고" 백산자료원 2003

      4 기경량, "평양성 출토 고구려 刻字城石의판독 및 위치 재검토" 한국사학회 (127) : 171-214, 2017

      5 동북아역사재단, "평양 지역 고구려도성 유적" 동북아역사재단 2013

      6 김희선, "동아시아 도성제와 고구려 장안성 : 6~8세기 도성의 가로구획 방식을 중심으로" 지식산업사 2010

      7 東潮, "고구려의 역사와 유적" 동북아역사재단 2008

      8 최희림, "고구려 평양성(장안성)의 성벽 축조형식과 시설물의 배치상태" 1967

      9 최희림, "고구려 평양성" 과학 백과사전출판사 1978

      10 기경량, "고구려 평양 장안성의 외성 내 격자형 구획과 도시 형태에 대한 신검토" 고구려발해학회 60 : 221-251, 2018

      1 고려대학교박물관, "한국 고대의 Global Pride 고구려" 통천문화사 2005

      2 최희림, "평양성을 쌓은 년대와 규모" 1967

      3 손수호, "평양성, 고구려돌칸 흙무덤 발굴보고" 백산자료원 2003

      4 기경량, "평양성 출토 고구려 刻字城石의판독 및 위치 재검토" 한국사학회 (127) : 171-214, 2017

      5 동북아역사재단, "평양 지역 고구려도성 유적" 동북아역사재단 2013

      6 김희선, "동아시아 도성제와 고구려 장안성 : 6~8세기 도성의 가로구획 방식을 중심으로" 지식산업사 2010

      7 東潮, "고구려의 역사와 유적" 동북아역사재단 2008

      8 최희림, "고구려 평양성(장안성)의 성벽 축조형식과 시설물의 배치상태" 1967

      9 최희림, "고구려 평양성" 과학 백과사전출판사 1978

      10 기경량, "고구려 평양 장안성의 외성 내 격자형 구획과 도시 형태에 대한 신검토" 고구려발해학회 60 : 221-251, 2018

      11 정원철, "고구려 장안성의 성벽 축조 과정에 대한 재검토" 사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소 25 (25): 23-45, 2010

      12 閔德植, "高句麗의 後期都城" 국사편찬위원회 19 : 1989

      13 閔德植, "高句麗의 平壤城의 築城過程에 관한 硏究" 39 : 1992

      14 朝鮮總督府, "高句麗時代之遺蹟 圖版上冊" 1929

      15 朴贊興, "高句麗尺에 대한 硏究" 44 : 1995

      16 兪泰勇, "高句麗尺에 대한 文獻史料와 考古學的 遺物의 再檢討" 11 : 2001

      17 關野貞, "高句麗の平壤城と長安城に就いて" 39 (39): 1928

      18 田中俊明, "高句麗 長安城의 規模와 特徵-條坊制를 中心으로-" 72 : 2005

      19 김희선, "高句麗 長安城의 築城過程과 遷都의 背景" 역사문화연구소 (22) : 3-32, 2005

      20 심정보, "高句麗 長安城 築造時期에 대한 問題點 Ⅰ・Ⅱ" 6 : 2005

      21 민덕식, "高句麗 平壤城의 都市形態와 設計" 고구려발해학회 15 : 5-, 2003

      22 李宇泰, "韓國古代의 尺度" 1 : 1984

      23 민덕식, "都城의 築造過程에 대한 檢討 -高句麗 平壤城(長安城)과 漢陽都城의 축조를 중심으로-" 서울역사편찬원 (75) : 5-62, 2010

      24 남영우, "舊韓末 韓半島 地形圖" 成地文化社 1996

      25 田中俊明, "東아시아 都城制에서 高句麗 長安城" 67 : 2003

      26 김희선, "北魏·隋唐代 都城과 高句麗 長安城" 백산학회 (81) : 253-296, 2008

      27 김희선, "6∼7세기 동아시아 도성제와 고구려長安城-도성의 가로구획방식을 중심으로-" 한국고대사학회 (43) : 39-82, 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼