RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      "人類의 共同遺産" 槪念의 法的 意味 = Legal Implication of the Concept of "the Common Heritage of Mankind"

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19576071

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      After the world war Ⅱ, an international society has been concerned about the outside region of national jurisdiction(Deep seabed, Outer Space, Moon, South Pole etc), and the development and conservation of its resources.
      As a result, Antarctic Treaty(1959), Outer Space Treaty(1967), the Moon Treaty(1979), and UNCLOS(1982) were concluded. Above all, through the treaties common Heritage of Mankind(CHM) was induced expressly or analogically as a new approach for the development and conservation of International Common Spaces.
      However, the question at issue is that the concept, character , extent, and regulations of CHM which was induced by the treaties have been interpreted and applied according to each treaty or standpoint of each nation. This lead to denunciation on the status of the CHM in international law. By the way, the core cause of this denunciation could be that there's no right legal definition on the terms of the CHM. It means that a prior question on the status of the CHM from the point of the international law is to analyze and examine closely the terms of this concept and define the legal implication.
      Therefore, I am willing to describe the appearance and development of the concept of CHM, analyze the legal significance on each term of the concept and evaluate generally the legal position of it through this study.
      번역하기

      After the world war Ⅱ, an international society has been concerned about the outside region of national jurisdiction(Deep seabed, Outer Space, Moon, South Pole etc), and the development and conservation of its resources. As a result, Antarctic Trea...

      After the world war Ⅱ, an international society has been concerned about the outside region of national jurisdiction(Deep seabed, Outer Space, Moon, South Pole etc), and the development and conservation of its resources.
      As a result, Antarctic Treaty(1959), Outer Space Treaty(1967), the Moon Treaty(1979), and UNCLOS(1982) were concluded. Above all, through the treaties common Heritage of Mankind(CHM) was induced expressly or analogically as a new approach for the development and conservation of International Common Spaces.
      However, the question at issue is that the concept, character , extent, and regulations of CHM which was induced by the treaties have been interpreted and applied according to each treaty or standpoint of each nation. This lead to denunciation on the status of the CHM in international law. By the way, the core cause of this denunciation could be that there's no right legal definition on the terms of the CHM. It means that a prior question on the status of the CHM from the point of the international law is to analyze and examine closely the terms of this concept and define the legal implication.
      Therefore, I am willing to describe the appearance and development of the concept of CHM, analyze the legal significance on each term of the concept and evaluate generally the legal position of it through this study.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼