RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      보호감독자에 의한 미성년자약취죄와 국외이송약취죄  :  베트남 여성의 자녀 약취 사건

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100150294

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Today we live in a global village owing to the development of transportation and communication and almost one of ten couples in Korea are married with a different nationality every year. In addition, divorce cases between international marriage couples are increasing rapidly. As families form and dissolve across international borders, domestic family law does not adequately address the needs of parents and children with ties to multiple legal systems. The international parental child abduction exemplifies these complex issues. When the child has been taken or kept overseas by one of the parents, that child may suffer from linguistic, social and cultural barriers and the left-behind parent may have difficulties in finding or recovering a child. Accordingly, it is necessary that the international parental child abduction should be handled differently considering the differences with child kidnapping within the country. The international society(Hague Conference on Private International Law) adopted the “Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction(Hague Child Abduction Convention)” in 1980 and South Korea acceded to the Hague Child Abduction Convention on December 13, 2012, whereby South Korea became the 89th contracting nation to the convention. However, considerable number of marriage immigrants in Korea came from countries such as China, Vietnam and the Philippines and these countries are not party to the Hague Child Abduction Convention. In this respect, the effectiveness of the international civil remedy through the Hague Child Abduction Convention is being questioned. The Supreme Court of Korea declared the defendant(Vietnamese female marriage immigrant) not guilty on June 30, 2013. The defendant took a 13 month old baby to her native Vietnam without husband’s consent and she was charged with kidnapping and transporting kidnapped person to foreign country. In this ruling, there was a fierce theoretical battle between Justices and 5 of 13 Justices wrote a dissenting opinion. As the divorce rate of multi-cultural family is raising, the number of korean parents who suffer from problems related to international child kidnapping by foreign spouses is on the increase. Under these circumstances, this Supreme Court judgement has a significant meaning. This paper reviews this Supreme Court judgement mainly with the established requirements of kidnapping minor and transporting abductee to foreign country.
      번역하기

      Today we live in a global village owing to the development of transportation and communication and almost one of ten couples in Korea are married with a different nationality every year. In addition, divorce cases between international marriage couple...

      Today we live in a global village owing to the development of transportation and communication and almost one of ten couples in Korea are married with a different nationality every year. In addition, divorce cases between international marriage couples are increasing rapidly. As families form and dissolve across international borders, domestic family law does not adequately address the needs of parents and children with ties to multiple legal systems. The international parental child abduction exemplifies these complex issues. When the child has been taken or kept overseas by one of the parents, that child may suffer from linguistic, social and cultural barriers and the left-behind parent may have difficulties in finding or recovering a child. Accordingly, it is necessary that the international parental child abduction should be handled differently considering the differences with child kidnapping within the country. The international society(Hague Conference on Private International Law) adopted the “Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction(Hague Child Abduction Convention)” in 1980 and South Korea acceded to the Hague Child Abduction Convention on December 13, 2012, whereby South Korea became the 89th contracting nation to the convention. However, considerable number of marriage immigrants in Korea came from countries such as China, Vietnam and the Philippines and these countries are not party to the Hague Child Abduction Convention. In this respect, the effectiveness of the international civil remedy through the Hague Child Abduction Convention is being questioned. The Supreme Court of Korea declared the defendant(Vietnamese female marriage immigrant) not guilty on June 30, 2013. The defendant took a 13 month old baby to her native Vietnam without husband’s consent and she was charged with kidnapping and transporting kidnapped person to foreign country. In this ruling, there was a fierce theoretical battle between Justices and 5 of 13 Justices wrote a dissenting opinion. As the divorce rate of multi-cultural family is raising, the number of korean parents who suffer from problems related to international child kidnapping by foreign spouses is on the increase. Under these circumstances, this Supreme Court judgement has a significant meaning. This paper reviews this Supreme Court judgement mainly with the established requirements of kidnapping minor and transporting abductee to foreign country.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • [대상판결] 대법원 2013. 6. 20. 선고 2010도14328 전원합의체판결
      • [사실관계]
      • [사건의 경과]
      • [판결요지]
      • [연 구]
      • [대상판결] 대법원 2013. 6. 20. 선고 2010도14328 전원합의체판결
      • [사실관계]
      • [사건의 경과]
      • [판결요지]
      • [연 구]
      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 미성년자약취죄와 국외이송약취죄에 대한 개관
      • 1. 입법취지와 보호법익
      • 2. 구성요건 체계와 법정형
      • Ⅲ. 미성년자약취죄와 국외이송약취죄의 성립 여부
      • 1. 행위주체
      • 2. 행위태양
      • Ⅳ. 형사정책적인 고려 및 개선방안
      • 1. 형사정책적 측면에서의 고려
      • 2. 개선방안 모색
      • Ⅴ. 결 론
      • [참고문헌]
      • [Abstract]
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김성돈, "형법각론" 성균관대학교출판부 2013

      2 김일수, "형법각론" 박영사 2007

      3 정영일, "형법각론" 박영사 2008

      4 정성근, "형법각론" 성균관대학교출판부(SKKUP) 2013

      5 임웅, "형법각론" 법문사 2005

      6 이형국, "형법각론" 법문사 2007

      7 이재상, "형법각론" 박영사 2014

      8 오영근, "형법각론" 박영사 2009

      9 배종대, "형법각론" 홍문사 2013

      10 손동권, "형법각론" 율곡출판사 2013

      1 김성돈, "형법각론" 성균관대학교출판부 2013

      2 김일수, "형법각론" 박영사 2007

      3 정영일, "형법각론" 박영사 2008

      4 정성근, "형법각론" 성균관대학교출판부(SKKUP) 2013

      5 임웅, "형법각론" 법문사 2005

      6 이형국, "형법각론" 법문사 2007

      7 이재상, "형법각론" 박영사 2014

      8 오영근, "형법각론" 박영사 2009

      9 배종대, "형법각론" 홍문사 2013

      10 손동권, "형법각론" 율곡출판사 2013

      11 하태훈, "미성년자약취죄와 국외이송약취죄의 ‘약취’의 의미- 대법원 2013.6.20. 선고 2010도14328 전원합의체 판결에 대한 평석 -" 법학연구원 (71) : 97-126, 2013

      12 조규창, "로마형법" 고려대학교 출판부 1998

      13 김유경, "다문화가족의 특성 변화와 정책적 함의"

      14 오영근, "다문화가정에서 미성년자약취 및 국외이송죄의 문제" 한국형사법학회 25 (25): 365-390, 2013

      15 석광현, "국제아동탈취의 민사적 측면에 관한 헤이그협약과 한국의 가입" 법학연구소 54 (54): 79-134, 2013

      16 이병화, "국제아동탈취의 민사적 측면에 관한 헤이그협약 연구" 법무부 2009

      17 Julia Alanen, "When Human Rights Conflict: Mediating International Parental Kidnapping Disputes Involving the Domestic Violence Defense" University of Miami 40 : 2008

      18 Paul R. Beaumont, "The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction" Oxford University Press 1999

      19 Thomas Fischer, "Strafgesetzbuch, 59. Auflage" C. H. Beck 2012

      20 Urs Kindhäuser, "Strafgesetzbuch, 4. Auflage" Nomos 2013

      21 Adlof Schönke, "Strafgesetzbuch, 28. Auflage" C.H.Beck 2010

      22 Karl Lackner, "Strafgesetzbuch, 27. Auflage" C. H. Beck 2011

      23 Helmut Satzger, "StGB: Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar" Carl Heymanns Verlag 2009

      24 법무부 출입국, "2012 출입국․외국인정책 통계연보" 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2021-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1 1 0.88
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.82 0.79 1.043 0.4
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼