RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    A Study on the Trends of Venice Biennale of Architecture Exhibition

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106230510

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Venice Biennale of architecture has been a living archive of displaying modern architecture since 1980. The purpose of this study is to investigate the trends of the characteristics of winning exhibitions of Golden Lion for National Participation at the Venice Biennale of Architecture, in the belief that it will provide useful insights to the international and regional trend in architectural culture. This research summarizes and analyzes the main exhibition and Golden Lion winning exhibitions in terms of their exhibition directions and presentation media. The scope of the study is from the sixth exhibition held in 1996 to the sixteenth exhibition held in 2018. The method of research was analysis of previous research related to the trends of Venice Biennale of Architecture and studies on exhibition presentation. First, exhibitions were categorized into two types based on their direction: Contextual (social, cultural, political, geographical, environmental) and Conceptual (re-imagining architecture, defining architecture, predicting architecture). The Contextual direction refers to themes that revolve around internal issues of a particular national participant. The Conceptual direction refers to the themes that present a vision or an ideology of an architect or group architects. Secondly, as choosing the appropriate medium for their exhibition is a crucial part of being selected as the Golden Lion for National Participation, winning exhibitions were labeled using three main exhibition media types: Visual art, New media, and Ambient installation. The results of the analysis are as follows. In the main exhibition, conceptual direction was favored while contextual direction was favored in the Golden Lion winning exhibitions. There is a tendency that winning exhibitions and main exhibitions having the same direction. Visual art was the most utilized exhibiting media among winning exhibitions. In conclusion, these results not only show the trend but also the interrelations between Golden Lion winning exhibitions and the main exhibition. These results support the purpose and value of this research.
    번역하기

    Venice Biennale of architecture has been a living archive of displaying modern architecture since 1980. The purpose of this study is to investigate the trends of the characteristics of winning exhibitions of Golden Lion for National Participation at t...

    Venice Biennale of architecture has been a living archive of displaying modern architecture since 1980. The purpose of this study is to investigate the trends of the characteristics of winning exhibitions of Golden Lion for National Participation at the Venice Biennale of Architecture, in the belief that it will provide useful insights to the international and regional trend in architectural culture. This research summarizes and analyzes the main exhibition and Golden Lion winning exhibitions in terms of their exhibition directions and presentation media. The scope of the study is from the sixth exhibition held in 1996 to the sixteenth exhibition held in 2018. The method of research was analysis of previous research related to the trends of Venice Biennale of Architecture and studies on exhibition presentation. First, exhibitions were categorized into two types based on their direction: Contextual (social, cultural, political, geographical, environmental) and Conceptual (re-imagining architecture, defining architecture, predicting architecture). The Contextual direction refers to themes that revolve around internal issues of a particular national participant. The Conceptual direction refers to the themes that present a vision or an ideology of an architect or group architects. Secondly, as choosing the appropriate medium for their exhibition is a crucial part of being selected as the Golden Lion for National Participation, winning exhibitions were labeled using three main exhibition media types: Visual art, New media, and Ambient installation. The results of the analysis are as follows. In the main exhibition, conceptual direction was favored while contextual direction was favored in the Golden Lion winning exhibitions. There is a tendency that winning exhibitions and main exhibitions having the same direction. Visual art was the most utilized exhibiting media among winning exhibitions. In conclusion, these results not only show the trend but also the interrelations between Golden Lion winning exhibitions and the main exhibition. These results support the purpose and value of this research.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 문대하, "현대 건축전시회의 연출위주 전시디자인에 관한 연구 : 제9회 베니스 비엔날레 국제건축전시회-Metamporph(2004년)를 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2006

    2 이기칠, "탈중심시대의 중심으로서 베니스비엔날레의 의미" 한국기초조형학회 13 (13): 329-339, 2012

    3 박슬기, "베니스 건축 비엔날레의 국가관 전시 경향에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 30 (30): 153-164, 2014

    4 Mladenovich, Milorad, "Strategy of exhibiting and presentation of architecture as an exhibition form" 2013

    5 "La Biennale Di Venezia"

    6 "Displayed Spaces"

    7 Basilico, Gabriele, "Common pavilions" Scheidegger Und Spiess Ag Verla 2013

    8 Levy, A., "Architecture on display" Architectural Association 2010

    9 Ballarin, Matteo, "Architecture Venete: padiglioni e spazi della Biennale di Venezia" Prima Edizione edizione 2016

    1 문대하, "현대 건축전시회의 연출위주 전시디자인에 관한 연구 : 제9회 베니스 비엔날레 국제건축전시회-Metamporph(2004년)를 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2006

    2 이기칠, "탈중심시대의 중심으로서 베니스비엔날레의 의미" 한국기초조형학회 13 (13): 329-339, 2012

    3 박슬기, "베니스 건축 비엔날레의 국가관 전시 경향에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 30 (30): 153-164, 2014

    4 Mladenovich, Milorad, "Strategy of exhibiting and presentation of architecture as an exhibition form" 2013

    5 "La Biennale Di Venezia"

    6 "Displayed Spaces"

    7 Basilico, Gabriele, "Common pavilions" Scheidegger Und Spiess Ag Verla 2013

    8 Levy, A., "Architecture on display" Architectural Association 2010

    9 Ballarin, Matteo, "Architecture Venete: padiglioni e spazi della Biennale di Venezia" Prima Edizione edizione 2016

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국문화공간건축학회 -> 한국문화공간건축학회논문집 KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.28 0.28 0.25
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.23 0.23 0.406 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼