RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      예학(禮學)에서 사학(史學)으로 -왕숙(王肅)과 두예(杜預)학문의 비교를 중심으로- = From ritual study to Historiography -A Study on the relationship of Wangsu and Duyu`s study-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99907789

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In Han times, the Historical Records (shi-ji) of Si-ma-qian and the Han Records (Han-shu) of Ban-Gu represented a great achievement of historical scholarship. But at that time people didn`t have the concept of ‘historiography’ (shi-xue) yet, so they classified the Historical Records (shi-ji) as the part of the canon study (jing-xue) writings, in the Han Records (Han-shu) yi-wen-zhi (藝 文志), the first bibliography of ancient writings. After the collapse of Han dynasty, Chinese knowledge system began to change, which divided into four fields, canon study (經), historiography (史), philosophy (子), literature (集), this classification system lasted until 19th century. Among them, this paper tried to examine how the historiography separated from canon study. Many scholars acknowledged that chinese historiography especially in Wei-Jin-Nan-Bei Chao times. The government developed an official organization designed to edit official historical works, and many individual and family historians wrote their own histories, so the amount of historical works increased impressively, and various kinds of history genres come on the stage in that time. But until now not so much scholars focused on the emergence of historical consciousness. So little is known about the concrete process of evolution of historical consciousness, which is most important to explain why the Wei-Jin-Nan-Bei Chao intellectuals began to think that historiography was independent scholarship from cannon study. To explain this subject, this paper considers the relations of two scholars, Wang-su and Du-yu. Wang-su was a most influential scholar in Wei dynasty, his main field was Ritual study (禮學). When he explained the Ritual (禮), he used to concerned the historical precedent, so his scholarship inclined to be rational and reject the dogmatism. But he failed to erect the interpretative system for confucian canons. But Wang-su had two outstanding students, Wang-bi(王弼) who elected the chinese metaphysics Xuan-xue (玄學), and Du-yu who made the historical methodology. Du-yu created the spring and autumn (春秋) hermeneutics, he tried to systemize a way to pursue the truth inside the historical text, the spring and autumn (春秋), and that was a great step forward the emergence of historical consciousness in the chinese way thinking.
      번역하기

      In Han times, the Historical Records (shi-ji) of Si-ma-qian and the Han Records (Han-shu) of Ban-Gu represented a great achievement of historical scholarship. But at that time people didn`t have the concept of ‘historiography’ (shi-xue) yet, so th...

      In Han times, the Historical Records (shi-ji) of Si-ma-qian and the Han Records (Han-shu) of Ban-Gu represented a great achievement of historical scholarship. But at that time people didn`t have the concept of ‘historiography’ (shi-xue) yet, so they classified the Historical Records (shi-ji) as the part of the canon study (jing-xue) writings, in the Han Records (Han-shu) yi-wen-zhi (藝 文志), the first bibliography of ancient writings. After the collapse of Han dynasty, Chinese knowledge system began to change, which divided into four fields, canon study (經), historiography (史), philosophy (子), literature (集), this classification system lasted until 19th century. Among them, this paper tried to examine how the historiography separated from canon study. Many scholars acknowledged that chinese historiography especially in Wei-Jin-Nan-Bei Chao times. The government developed an official organization designed to edit official historical works, and many individual and family historians wrote their own histories, so the amount of historical works increased impressively, and various kinds of history genres come on the stage in that time. But until now not so much scholars focused on the emergence of historical consciousness. So little is known about the concrete process of evolution of historical consciousness, which is most important to explain why the Wei-Jin-Nan-Bei Chao intellectuals began to think that historiography was independent scholarship from cannon study. To explain this subject, this paper considers the relations of two scholars, Wang-su and Du-yu. Wang-su was a most influential scholar in Wei dynasty, his main field was Ritual study (禮學). When he explained the Ritual (禮), he used to concerned the historical precedent, so his scholarship inclined to be rational and reject the dogmatism. But he failed to erect the interpretative system for confucian canons. But Wang-su had two outstanding students, Wang-bi(王弼) who elected the chinese metaphysics Xuan-xue (玄學), and Du-yu who made the historical methodology. Du-yu created the spring and autumn (春秋) hermeneutics, he tried to systemize a way to pursue the truth inside the historical text, the spring and autumn (春秋), and that was a great step forward the emergence of historical consciousness in the chinese way thinking.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼