임화 문학의 현재성 ; 임화의 신문학사 인식과 전통 -구소설과 신소설의 연속성- = Special Studies on The Actuality of Im Hwa`s Literature : ImHwa(林和)`s Recognition Regarding Relation of the Korean Modern History of Literature(新文學史) and a Tradition－Continuity of New-novel and Old-novel

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

ImHwa(林和)`s Korean modern history of literature(新文學史) is described a differentiation of middle ages literature and modern literature in quality. ImHwa defined the Korean modern history of literature that it was the literature that does a modern spirit to contents, and was written to the Korean language which did a genre of the Western European literature with formats. ImHwa described the Korean modern history of literature that it was stopped with middle ages literature and it was the transplant history of literature of West literature. By the way, ImHwa actually described `New-novel` that it was a combinded literature which put together with a format of `Old-novel` a and a Contents of literature abroad. But what the Korean modern history of literature is succeeding to a format of `Old-novel` is to be contradictory with his thought. In addition to formats in contents, Logical recognition of ImHwa and the actual description are each other contradictory. The internal volume characteristic of `New-novel` which ImHwa is taking for example through Hyeoluiru, Eunsegye, Chiaksan, Gwiuiseong is caught `Old-novel` such as Sassinamjeonggi, Choecheokjeon, Chunhyangjeon. According to recognition logic of ImHwa, `New-novel` is defined to the modern literature. The true modern literature starts from Mujeong. `New-novel` is `Old-novel` and a form having continued historically. the history of novel until `New-novel` appears becomes the premodern literature. ImHwa told `transplant`, but actually it is to have described `succession`.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임규찬, "林和 新文學史" 한길사 1993

2 이인직, "한국소설문학대계" 동아출판사 1995

3 권보드래, "한국 근대소설의 기원" 소명출판 2000

4 김현양, "최척전, ‘희망’과 ‘연대’의 서사" 열상고전연구회 24 : 2006

5 박희병, "임화의 이식문학론 비판" 서울대 한국문화연구소 22 : 1988

6 김외곤, "임화의 신문학사와 오리엔탈리즘" 한국문학이론과비평학회 (5) : 1999

7 전승주, "임화의 신문학사 방법론에 관한 연구" 서울대 1988

8 한기형, "임화의 문학사 서술에 대한 관점의 몇 가지 문제 in:한국 근대문학사의 쟁점" 창작과비평사 1990

9 김춘식, "임화의 ‘근대성’과 ‘전통’-임화의 신문학사 인식을 중심으로" 한국언어문화학회 27 (27): 523-546, 2005

10 김윤식, "이식문학론 비판, 한국문학의 근대성과 이데올로기비판" 서울대출판부 1987

11 신승엽, "이식과 창조의 변증법" (가을) : 1991

12 한기형, "신소설의 근대문학적 위상" 성균관대 1997

13 김현양, "사씨남정기?와 욕망의 문제－소설사적 평가와 관련하여" 한국고전문학회 12 : 1997

14 김만중, "사씨남정기" 태학사 1999

15 이상구, "17세기 애정전기소설" 월인 1999