RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인지 아키텍처 ACT-R 모델링의 새로운 대안: 수 세기 과제를 중심으로 = An Alternative to Modeling in the ACT-R Cognitive Architecture: Focused on Enumeration Tasks

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104517236

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      통합은 항상 과학의 목표가 되어 왔으며 과학이 갖는 태도이기도 하다(Newell, 1990). 따라서 개별적으로 연구되어온 인지 행동들을 통합하여 설명할 수 있는 하나의 틀이 필요하다는 인식이 대두되었으며, 이를 가능하게 할 수 있는 통합이론으로서의 인지 아키텍처들(cognitive architectures)이 제안되어 발전해 왔다. 본 논문에서는 인지 아키텍처의 개념을 정리하고, 대표적인 인지 아키텍처들을 개관한 후, 가장 활발한 연구가 진행되고 있는 ACT-R의 모델링에 대해 살펴보았다. 궁극적으로 본 논문에서는 통합인지이론인 인지 아키텍처의 발전 방향을 제시하고자 하였는데, ACT-R에서 고려하지 못하고 있는 전략 사용에 따른 반응 시간 감소를 검증하였고, 선행연구에서 보고한 써비타이징 현상을 재검증하였다. 본 논문에서는 관찰된 보편적인 인간 행동의 측면들을 반영할 수 있도록 새로운 알고리듬을 제안함으로써 보다 통합되고 발전된 형태로의 인지 아키텍처를 위한 제언을 하고자 하였다.
      번역하기

      통합은 항상 과학의 목표가 되어 왔으며 과학이 갖는 태도이기도 하다(Newell, 1990). 따라서 개별적으로 연구되어온 인지 행동들을 통합하여 설명할 수 있는 하나의 틀이 필요하다는 인식이 대...

      통합은 항상 과학의 목표가 되어 왔으며 과학이 갖는 태도이기도 하다(Newell, 1990). 따라서 개별적으로 연구되어온 인지 행동들을 통합하여 설명할 수 있는 하나의 틀이 필요하다는 인식이 대두되었으며, 이를 가능하게 할 수 있는 통합이론으로서의 인지 아키텍처들(cognitive architectures)이 제안되어 발전해 왔다. 본 논문에서는 인지 아키텍처의 개념을 정리하고, 대표적인 인지 아키텍처들을 개관한 후, 가장 활발한 연구가 진행되고 있는 ACT-R의 모델링에 대해 살펴보았다. 궁극적으로 본 논문에서는 통합인지이론인 인지 아키텍처의 발전 방향을 제시하고자 하였는데, ACT-R에서 고려하지 못하고 있는 전략 사용에 따른 반응 시간 감소를 검증하였고, 선행연구에서 보고한 써비타이징 현상을 재검증하였다. 본 논문에서는 관찰된 보편적인 인간 행동의 측면들을 반영할 수 있도록 새로운 알고리듬을 제안함으로써 보다 통합되고 발전된 형태로의 인지 아키텍처를 위한 제언을 하고자 하였다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Cognitive architectures as unified cognitive theories can produce an integrated explanation of human mind and behaviors. The definitions of a cognitive architecture, fundamental characteristics of prominent architectures(Soar, EPIC, and ACT-R), modeling paradigm using ACT-R, and application areas of ACT-R were introduced and reviewed. The purpose of this study was to examine the modeling of a visual processing in ACT-R, which has been evolved as an unified cognitive theory, to suggest developmental directions in ACT-R. For this purpose, enumeration time of stimuli set size was measured(the enumeration task was adopted because it contains every default productions in ACT-R models established using visual stimuli). The results showed that the knowledge of set size affected on counting strategy which in turn reduced counting time for relatively larger set size of 7 to 9 items. However, the use of the strategy in enumeration appeared to be overlooked in the current cognitive architectures, especially in ACT-R. Based on the results of empirical data, a new ACT-R algorithm on visual stimuli process was proposed. Finally, the implication of the present study on the future cognitive architecture was discussed.
      번역하기

      Cognitive architectures as unified cognitive theories can produce an integrated explanation of human mind and behaviors. The definitions of a cognitive architecture, fundamental characteristics of prominent architectures(Soar, EPIC, and ACT-R), modeli...

      Cognitive architectures as unified cognitive theories can produce an integrated explanation of human mind and behaviors. The definitions of a cognitive architecture, fundamental characteristics of prominent architectures(Soar, EPIC, and ACT-R), modeling paradigm using ACT-R, and application areas of ACT-R were introduced and reviewed. The purpose of this study was to examine the modeling of a visual processing in ACT-R, which has been evolved as an unified cognitive theory, to suggest developmental directions in ACT-R. For this purpose, enumeration time of stimuli set size was measured(the enumeration task was adopted because it contains every default productions in ACT-R models established using visual stimuli). The results showed that the knowledge of set size affected on counting strategy which in turn reduced counting time for relatively larger set size of 7 to 9 items. However, the use of the strategy in enumeration appeared to be overlooked in the current cognitive architectures, especially in ACT-R. Based on the results of empirical data, a new ACT-R algorithm on visual stimuli process was proposed. Finally, the implication of the present study on the future cognitive architecture was discussed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Newell, A., "You can't play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium;Visual information processing" Academic Press 1973

      2 Anderson, J.R., "Working memory: Activation limitations on retrieval" 30 : 221-256, 1996

      3 Trick, L.M., "Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision" 101 : 80-102, 1994

      4 Trick, L.M., "What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capcacity preattentive process" 19 : 331-351, 1993

      5 Steier, D.E., "Varieties of learning in Soar" Mogan Kaufmann 1987

      6 Byrne, M.D., "Using computational cognitive modeling to diagnose possible sources of aviation error" 15 : 135-155, 2005

      7 Laird, J., "Universal subgoaling and chunking" Kluwer 1986

      8 Newell, A., "Unified theories of cognition" Harvard University Press 1990

      9 Anderson, J.R., "Tower of Hanoi: Evidence for the Cost of Goal Retrieval" 27 : 1331-1346, 2001

      10 Kinstch, W., "The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction- integration model" 95 : 163-182, 1988

      1 Newell, A., "You can't play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium;Visual information processing" Academic Press 1973

      2 Anderson, J.R., "Working memory: Activation limitations on retrieval" 30 : 221-256, 1996

      3 Trick, L.M., "Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision" 101 : 80-102, 1994

      4 Trick, L.M., "What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capcacity preattentive process" 19 : 331-351, 1993

      5 Steier, D.E., "Varieties of learning in Soar" Mogan Kaufmann 1987

      6 Byrne, M.D., "Using computational cognitive modeling to diagnose possible sources of aviation error" 15 : 135-155, 2005

      7 Laird, J., "Universal subgoaling and chunking" Kluwer 1986

      8 Newell, A., "Unified theories of cognition" Harvard University Press 1990

      9 Anderson, J.R., "Tower of Hanoi: Evidence for the Cost of Goal Retrieval" 27 : 1331-1346, 2001

      10 Kinstch, W., "The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction- integration model" 95 : 163-182, 1988

      11 Howes, A., "The role of cognitive architecture in modeling the user: Soar's learning mechanism" 12 : 311-343, 1997

      12 Card, S.K., "The psychology of human-computer interaction" Erlbaum 1983

      13 Foder, J.A., "The modularity of the mind" MIT Press 1983

      14 Popper, K.R., "The logic of scientific discovery" Basic Books 1959

      15 Fitts, P.M., "The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement" 47 : 381-391, 1954

      16 Kaufman, E., "The discrimination of visual number" 62 : 498-525, 1949

      17 Anderson, J.R., "The architecture of cognition" Harvard University Press 1983

      18 Rosenbloom, P.S., "The SOAR papers: Research on integrated intelligence" MIT Press 1992

      19 John, B.E., "The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: Comparison and contrast" 3 : 320-351, 1996

      20 Newell, A., "Symbolic architectures for cognition;Foundations of cognitive science" The MIT Press 1993

      21 Basak, C., "Subitizing Speed, Subitizing Range, Counting Speed, the Stroop Effect, and Aging: Capacity Differences and Speed Equivalence" 18 : 240-249, 2003

      22 Oyama, T., "Span of attention, backward masking and reaction time" 29 : 106-112, 1981

      23 Haverty, L.A., "Solving induction problems in mathematics: Not-so-trivial pursuit" 24 : 249-298, 2000

      24 Laird, J.E., "SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence" 33 : 1-64, 1987

      25 Anderson, J.R., "Rules of mind" Lawrence Erlbaum 1993

      26 Newell, A., "Production systems: Models of control structures;Visual information processing" Academic Press 1973

      27 Kieras, D.E., "Predictive engineering models based on the EPIC architecture for a multimodal high-performance human-computer interaction task" 4 : 230-275, 1997

      28 Newell, A., "Physical symbol systems" 4 : 135-183, 1980

      29 Byrne, M.D., "Perception and action;The atomic components of thought" Erlbaum 1998

      30 Aoki, T, "On the counting process of patterned dots" 36 : 15-22, 1977

      31 Ritter, F.E., "Models of two-person games in ACT-R and Soar" University Press 202-203, 1998

      32 Salvucci, D.D., "Modeling effects of age in complex tasks: A case study in driving" 1197-1202, 2004

      33 Fum, D., "Modeling counter offer behavior in dyadic distributive negotiation" 79-84, 2001

      34 Altmann, E.M., "Memory for goals: An architectural perspective" 19-24, 1999

      35 Anderson, J.R., "Language, memory, and thought" Lawrence Erlbaum 1976

      36 Gary, W.D., "Introduction to this special issue on cognitive architectures and human- computer interaction" 12 : 301-353, 1997

      37 Anderson, J.R., "Introduction of augmented transition networks" 1 : 125-157, 1977

      38 Newell, A., "Human problem solving" Erlbaum 1972

      39 Anderson, J.R., "Human associative memory" Winston 1973

      40 Newell, A., "GPS, a program that simulates human thought;Computer and thought" MIT Press 1963

      41 Matessa, M., "Focused Learning in a Linguistic Environment" 990-, 1997

      42 Lakatos, I., "Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes;Criticism and the growth of knowledge" Cambridge University Press 1970

      43 Anderson, J.R., "FRAN: A simulated model of free recall;The Psychology of Learning and Motivation" Academic Press 1972

      44 Salvucci, D.D., "Distract-R: Rapid prototyping and evaluation of in-vehicle interfaces" ACM Press 581-589, 2005

      45 Pylyshyn, Z.W., "Computation and cognition" MIT Press 1984

      46 Ball, J.T., "Compating three variants of a computational process model of basic aircraft maneuvering" 87-89, 2003

      47 Lewis, R.L., "Cognitive theory, Soar. In International Encylopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences" Elsevier Science 2001

      48 Byrne, M.D., "Cognitive architectures in HCI: Present work and future directions" 2005

      49 Byrne, M.D., "Cognitive architecture;The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications" Lawrence Erlbaum 97-117, 2003

      50 Anderson, J.R., "Atomic components of thought" Lawrence Erlbaum 1998

      51 Kieras, D.E., "An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction" 12 : 391-438, 1997

      52 Anderson, J.R., "An integrated theory of the mind" 111 : 1036-1060, 2004

      53 Anderson, J.R., "An integrated theory of list memory" 38 : 341-380, 1998

      54 Rosenbloom, P.S., "An integrated computational model of stimulus- response compatibility and practice;The psychology of learning and motivation(vol. 21)" Academic Press 1988

      55 Anderson, J.R., "ACT-R: a theory of higher level cognition and its relation to visual attention" 12 : 439-462, 1997

      56 Byrne, M.D., "ACT-R/PM and menu selection: Applying a cognitive architecture to HCI" 55 : 41-84, 2001

      57 Anderson, J.R., "A production system theory of serial memory" 104 : 728-748, 1997

      58 Lebiere, C., "A dynamic ACT-R model of simple games" 296-301, 1999

      59 Meyer, D.E., "A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multi-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena" 104 : 749-791, 1997

      60 Meyer, D.E., "A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multi-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms" 104 : 2-65, 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-06-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Psychology -> Korean Journal of Psychology: General KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.31 1.31 1.63
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.13 2.1 2.669 0.8
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼