RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      팔라츠키의 정치활동과 그 한계성 - 2월칙령(Februarpatent; Únorová ústava)발표이후부터 러시아 방문까지의 시기를 중심으로 - = Political Activities of Palacký and Their Limits. - From the Royal Order(Februarpatent;Únorová ústava)Announcement of 1861 to Palackýs’ Visit of Russia in 1867 -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104463772

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Following the suppression of the 1848 revolutions in the Habsburg lands, political activity was outlawed, but the failures of this “neoabsolutist” system, especially the losses in the Italian War of 1859, cauesd Emperor Francis Joseph I to change course. As a result, the so called constitutional era in the Austrian Empire was launched in 1860, and provincial diets reappeared, an imperial parliament(the Reichsrat) was established in Vienna, and political parties were founded. After the revolution of 1848 failed, Palacký retreated to scholarly work but returned to public life in 1860, when a new constitution revived political activity in the empire. As the leader of the Czech National Party, he fought for the autonomy of the Bohemian crown lands on the basis of historic state rights, and supported a tactical alliance with the conservative great landowners to achieve this goal. The aristocratic alliance, along with his support for Czech abstention from governmental bodies such as the imperial parliament, eventually caused the party to split between “Old Czechs,” who supported his program, and “Young Czechs,” who favored a more progressive program and activist stance.
      The Seven Weeks’ war in the summer of 1866 led to the decisive defeat of Austria at Königgrätz and consequent exclusion of Austria from German affairs. The military disator compelled Francis Joseph I to come to terms with the Magyars. The subsequent Ausgleich, or Compromise of 1867 transformed the Habsburg Empire into a dual monarchy. This monarchy, in effect, permitted the German-speaking Austrians and the Hungarians Magyars to dominate all other nationalities in their respective states. Many of the other national groups within the empire- including the Czechs, the Ruthenians, and the Serbo-Croatians- opposed the Compromise of 1867. The most vicious critics were the Czechs of Bohemia.
      The Compromise of 1867, which created the new state of Austria-Hungary out of the old empire, gave a crushing blow to Palacký’s efforts, and he warned it to be the negotiations, “We were here before Austria and we will be here after it is gone”.
      Since then Palacký abandoned a Austroslavism and was interested in Slavism.. He had both Russian and French support and got a national independence of the Czech. But this made end with the failure. Gradually he reaffirmed that the Austrian Empire was the only guarantee of rights of the Czech.
      Disillusioned by the repeated failure of Czech political efforts, he urged his countrymen to cultivate moral and cultural superiority over their enemies. At that time he favored a policy of trialism or triple monarchy. Palacký died in 1876 and his reputation as the “Father of the Czech Nation” firmly established.(Kwandong University)
      번역하기

      Following the suppression of the 1848 revolutions in the Habsburg lands, political activity was outlawed, but the failures of this “neoabsolutist” system, especially the losses in the Italian War of 1859, cauesd Emperor Francis Joseph I to change ...

      Following the suppression of the 1848 revolutions in the Habsburg lands, political activity was outlawed, but the failures of this “neoabsolutist” system, especially the losses in the Italian War of 1859, cauesd Emperor Francis Joseph I to change course. As a result, the so called constitutional era in the Austrian Empire was launched in 1860, and provincial diets reappeared, an imperial parliament(the Reichsrat) was established in Vienna, and political parties were founded. After the revolution of 1848 failed, Palacký retreated to scholarly work but returned to public life in 1860, when a new constitution revived political activity in the empire. As the leader of the Czech National Party, he fought for the autonomy of the Bohemian crown lands on the basis of historic state rights, and supported a tactical alliance with the conservative great landowners to achieve this goal. The aristocratic alliance, along with his support for Czech abstention from governmental bodies such as the imperial parliament, eventually caused the party to split between “Old Czechs,” who supported his program, and “Young Czechs,” who favored a more progressive program and activist stance.
      The Seven Weeks’ war in the summer of 1866 led to the decisive defeat of Austria at Königgrätz and consequent exclusion of Austria from German affairs. The military disator compelled Francis Joseph I to come to terms with the Magyars. The subsequent Ausgleich, or Compromise of 1867 transformed the Habsburg Empire into a dual monarchy. This monarchy, in effect, permitted the German-speaking Austrians and the Hungarians Magyars to dominate all other nationalities in their respective states. Many of the other national groups within the empire- including the Czechs, the Ruthenians, and the Serbo-Croatians- opposed the Compromise of 1867. The most vicious critics were the Czechs of Bohemia.
      The Compromise of 1867, which created the new state of Austria-Hungary out of the old empire, gave a crushing blow to Palacký’s efforts, and he warned it to be the negotiations, “We were here before Austria and we will be here after it is gone”.
      Since then Palacký abandoned a Austroslavism and was interested in Slavism.. He had both Russian and French support and got a national independence of the Czech. But this made end with the failure. Gradually he reaffirmed that the Austrian Empire was the only guarantee of rights of the Czech.
      Disillusioned by the repeated failure of Czech political efforts, he urged his countrymen to cultivate moral and cultural superiority over their enemies. At that time he favored a policy of trialism or triple monarchy. Palacký died in 1876 and his reputation as the “Father of the Czech Nation” firmly established.(Kwandong University)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김장수, "팔라츠키(F.Palacký)의 오스트리아 명제: 정립과 실천과정을 중심으로" 한국서양문화사학회 (20) : 68-100, 2009

      2 김장수, "체코정치가들의 활동 및 지향목표 -소극정치(pasivní politika) 이후부터 체코슬로바키아공화국 등장 이전까지의 시기를 중심으로-" 한국서양문화사학회 24 (24): 127-156, 2011

      3 Fink, H. P., "Österreich und die Slaven in der Publizistik der Slavophilen von den 40er Jahren des 19. Jahrhunderts bis zum Ausgleich, Wien"

      4 Hanak, P, "die Geschichte Ungrns" Budapest 1988

      5 Zeithammer, A. O., "Zur Geschichte der böhmischen Ausgleichversuche I., Prag"

      6 Somogyi, E., "Vom Zentralismus zum Dualismus" Wiesbaden 1993

      7 Mauritz, M., "Tschchien" Regensburg 2002

      8 Palacký, F, "Spisy drobné, Bd., I" 1898

      9 Stloukal, K, "Rodinne listy Frantiska Palackeho dcere Mariia zeti F. L. Riegrovi, Praha" 1930

      10 Jandásek, L., "Přehledné dějíny Sokolstva, Praha"

      1 김장수, "팔라츠키(F.Palacký)의 오스트리아 명제: 정립과 실천과정을 중심으로" 한국서양문화사학회 (20) : 68-100, 2009

      2 김장수, "체코정치가들의 활동 및 지향목표 -소극정치(pasivní politika) 이후부터 체코슬로바키아공화국 등장 이전까지의 시기를 중심으로-" 한국서양문화사학회 24 (24): 127-156, 2011

      3 Fink, H. P., "Österreich und die Slaven in der Publizistik der Slavophilen von den 40er Jahren des 19. Jahrhunderts bis zum Ausgleich, Wien"

      4 Hanak, P, "die Geschichte Ungrns" Budapest 1988

      5 Zeithammer, A. O., "Zur Geschichte der böhmischen Ausgleichversuche I., Prag"

      6 Somogyi, E., "Vom Zentralismus zum Dualismus" Wiesbaden 1993

      7 Mauritz, M., "Tschchien" Regensburg 2002

      8 Palacký, F, "Spisy drobné, Bd., I" 1898

      9 Stloukal, K, "Rodinne listy Frantiska Palackeho dcere Mariia zeti F. L. Riegrovi, Praha" 1930

      10 Jandásek, L., "Přehledné dějíny Sokolstva, Praha"

      11 Státni Ústřední Archiv v Praze, "Presidium místodržitelství tajné, K.10, Nr"

      12 Böhm, F, "Prag, München"

      13 Palacký, F, "Politisches Vermächtnis" Prag 1872

      14 Křen, J., "Palackýs Mitteleuropavorstellung, In Unabhängige Geschichts- schreibung in der Teschechoslowakai 1960-1980" Hannover 1980

      15 Kořalka, J., "Palacký und Österreich als Vielvölkerstaat, In Nationale Vielfalt und gemeinsames Erbe in Mitteleuropa" München 1990

      16 Grobelny, A., "K problematic cesko-polskych vztah u v letech 1868 az" 5 : 1963

      17 Palacký, F., "Idea státu Rakoukého" Praha 1865

      18 Görlich, E. J, "Grundzüge der Geschichte der Habsburgermonarchie und Österreichs" Darmstadt 1990

      19 Weissensteiner, F, "Große Herrscher des Hauses Habsburg" München 1997

      20 Prinz, F., "Geschichte Böhmens 1848-1948" Frankfurt 1991

      21 Morava, G. J, "Franz Palacký" Wien 1990

      22 Birke, E., "Frankreich und Ostmitteleuropa im 19.Jh., Köln-Graz"

      23 Wank, S., "Foreign Policy and Nationality Problem in Austria-Hungry 1867-1914" 3 : 1967

      24 Wandruszka, A, "Die Habsburgermonarchie(1848-1918) Bd., III., Wien" 1980

      25 Görtemaker, M., "Deutschland im 19. Jahrhundert, Opladen"

      26 Falkenstein, E. T. V, "Der Kampf der Tschechen um die historischen Rechte der böhmischen Krone im Spiegel der Presse 1861-1879" Wiesbaden 1982

      27 Moritsch, A., "Der Austroslawismus" Wien-Köln-Weimar 1998

      28 Fischel, A, "Das tschechische Volk, Bd., 1" Breslau 1928

      29 Hugelmann, K. G., "Das Nationalitätenrecht nach der Verfassung von 1867, Wien"

      30 Raupach, H., "Bismarck und die Tschechen im Jahre 1866" Berlin 1936

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-12-28 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국서양문화사학회 -> 한국세계문화사학회
      영문명 : The Korean Society Of Western Civilization -> Korea Association of World History and Culture
      KCI등재
      2018-12-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 서양 역사와 문화 연구 -> 세계 역사와 문화 연구
      외국어명 : Journal of Western History and Culture -> World History and Culture
      KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-12-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 서양사학연구 -> 서양 역사와 문화 연구
      외국어명 : Journal of Western History -> Journal of Western History and Culture
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.3 0.3 0.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.32 0.29 0.671 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼