RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    전략적 경쟁자(strategic competitor) 혹은 이익공유자(stakeholder)?, 미중 군사교류에 대한 일 고찰

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76176368

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since its normalization, the United States and China have sustained it's own sharply different strategic interests based upon different political system and perspectives on international order in East Asia. While the Soviet, the common threat, had provided the both with the strategic motivation for military exchange, disintegration of the Cold War and the Tiananmen Incident underlay the process of US-China military exchange since the late 1980s. The gap of perception and strategic interests between two countries constrained the progress of military exchange, meanwhile there is no evidence that the military exchange infringed on national security interests of two countries. Ironically, it made both the countries better understand the difference each other. In 2005, Rumsfeld's visit to China is interpreted as a signal of rehabilitation of US-China military exchange which has been stalemated since Bush took office. Reciprocity and transparency, a seemingly new principle of military exchange on U.S. side, might be achieved by any action to relieve Chinese suspicion of U.S. containment policy. The U.S-China military exchange will be a critical channel to bring in common interest and cooperation and eradicate untrust in security issues between two countries in the future.
    번역하기

    Since its normalization, the United States and China have sustained it's own sharply different strategic interests based upon different political system and perspectives on international order in East Asia. While the Soviet, the common threat, had pro...

    Since its normalization, the United States and China have sustained it's own sharply different strategic interests based upon different political system and perspectives on international order in East Asia. While the Soviet, the common threat, had provided the both with the strategic motivation for military exchange, disintegration of the Cold War and the Tiananmen Incident underlay the process of US-China military exchange since the late 1980s. The gap of perception and strategic interests between two countries constrained the progress of military exchange, meanwhile there is no evidence that the military exchange infringed on national security interests of two countries. Ironically, it made both the countries better understand the difference each other. In 2005, Rumsfeld's visit to China is interpreted as a signal of rehabilitation of US-China military exchange which has been stalemated since Bush took office. Reciprocity and transparency, a seemingly new principle of military exchange on U.S. side, might be achieved by any action to relieve Chinese suspicion of U.S. containment policy. The U.S-China military exchange will be a critical channel to bring in common interest and cooperation and eradicate untrust in security issues between two countries in the future.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 차창훈, "거버넌스와 중국의 지역안보 전략 논의: 다자주의와‘新安全槪念’을 중심으로(동아시아의 거버넌스: 지역, 국가, 지방에 대한 다층적 접근)" 서울: 오름출판사 2004

    2 "中國的國防(1998, 2000, 2002, 2004)" 1998

    3 Pollpeter, Kevin, "U.S.-China Security Management: Assessing the Military-to-Military Relationship" Santa Monica: RAND Corporation 2004

    4 Lampton, Daivd M, "U.S.-China Relations in a Post-September 11th World" Washington, D.C.: The Nixon Center 2002

    5 Allen, Kenneth W, "U.S.-China Military Relations Not a One-Way Street" 1999

    6 Perry, William H, "U.S. Strategy: Engaging China, Not Contain It(remarks delivered to the Washington State China Relations Council)" 1995

    7 Dittmer, Lowell, "The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game-Theoretic Analysis" 33 : 1981

    8 Suettinger, Robert L, "The Rise and Descent of Peaceful Rise" (12) : 2004

    9 Pollack, Jonathan D, "The Lessons of Coalition Politics: Sino-American Security Relations" Santa Monica: RAND Corporation 1984

    10 Friedberg, Aaron L, "The Future of U.S.-China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?" 30 (30): 2005

    1 차창훈, "거버넌스와 중국의 지역안보 전략 논의: 다자주의와‘新安全槪念’을 중심으로(동아시아의 거버넌스: 지역, 국가, 지방에 대한 다층적 접근)" 서울: 오름출판사 2004

    2 "中國的國防(1998, 2000, 2002, 2004)" 1998

    3 Pollpeter, Kevin, "U.S.-China Security Management: Assessing the Military-to-Military Relationship" Santa Monica: RAND Corporation 2004

    4 Lampton, Daivd M, "U.S.-China Relations in a Post-September 11th World" Washington, D.C.: The Nixon Center 2002

    5 Allen, Kenneth W, "U.S.-China Military Relations Not a One-Way Street" 1999

    6 Perry, William H, "U.S. Strategy: Engaging China, Not Contain It(remarks delivered to the Washington State China Relations Council)" 1995

    7 Dittmer, Lowell, "The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game-Theoretic Analysis" 33 : 1981

    8 Suettinger, Robert L, "The Rise and Descent of Peaceful Rise" (12) : 2004

    9 Pollack, Jonathan D, "The Lessons of Coalition Politics: Sino-American Security Relations" Santa Monica: RAND Corporation 1984

    10 Friedberg, Aaron L, "The Future of U.S.-China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?" 30 (30): 2005

    11 Gertz, Bill, "The China Threat: How the People’s Republic Targets America" Washington D.C.: Regnery Publishing Inc. 2000

    12 Shambaugh, David, "Sino-American Strategic Relations: From Partners To Competitors" 42 (42): 2000

    13 Shambaugh, David, "Sino-American Relations since September 11: Can the New Stability Last?" 2002

    14 Lampton, David M, "Same Bed, Different Dreams: Managing U.S.-China Relations" Berkeley, California: University of California Press 2001

    15 "Rumsfeld: China’s military buildup a threat" Associated Press 2005

    16 Sebastopulo, Demetri, "Rumsfeld worried by China military expansion(October 19)"

    17 "Rumsfeld tells China its military buildup worries neighbors" 2005

    18 U.S. Department of Defense, "Quadrennial Defense Review" 2006

    19 Brzezinski, Zbigniew, "Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Adviser 1977-1981" New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux 1983

    20 MaCavoy, Audrey, "Pacific Commander aims to expand contacts with China" Associated Press 2005

    21 U.S. Department of Defense, "News Articles(October 19)"

    22 U.S. Department of Defense, "News Articles(January 20)"

    23 Shambaugh, David, "Modernizing China’s Military: Progress, Problems, and Prospects" Berkeley: University of California Press 2002

    24 Gertz, Bill, "Military Exchanges with Beijing Raises Security Concerns" 1999

    25 Secretary of Defense William Perry, "Memorandum for the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force Concerning the U.S.-China Military Relationship, July 1994"

    26 Pan, Philip P, "In China, Rumsfeld urges greater global role, freedom and military candor" 2005

    27 Gertz, Bill, "General Postpones Trip to China" 1999

    28 White House, "Fact Sheet: Accomplishments of U.S.-China Summit(October 29)"

    29 Scarborough, Rowan, "Experts Say U.S. Should Review Military Exchanges with China" Washington Times 1999

    30 Finkelstein, David M, "Engaging DoD: Chinese Perspectives on Military Relations with the United States" Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses Corporation 1999

    31 Kahn, Joseph, "Chinese general threatens use of A-bombs if US intrudes" New York Times 2005

    32 Higgins, Andrew, "Chinese Goals Take a Backseat As U.S. Rises to the Fore in Asia" Wall Street Journal 2001

    33 Yoon, Eden Y, "Chinese Arms Sales and U.S.-China Military Relations" 29 (29): 1989

    34 Gurtov, Mel, "China’s Security: The New Roles of the Military" Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc. 1998

    35 Zheng, Bijian, "China’s Peaceful Rise: Speeches of Zheng Bijian" Washington D.C.:Brookings Institution Press 2005

    36 Medeiros, Evan S, "China’s New Diplomacy" 82 (82): 2003

    37 Frieman, Wendy, "China’s Military R&D System: Reform and Reorientation, in Science and Technology in Post-Mao China" Harvard: Harvard University Press 1989

    38 Allen, Kenneth W, "China’s Foreign Military Relations" Washington, D.C.: Henry L. Stimson Center 1999

    39 Information Office of State Council, "China’s Arms Control and Disarmament" Beijing:State Council 1995

    40 Gill, Bates, "China’s Arms Acquisition From Abroad: A Quest for ‘Superb and Secret Weapons’" Oxford: Oxford University Press 1995

    41 Pollack, Jonathan D, "China and the Global Strategic Balance, in China’s Foreign Relations in the 1980s" New Haven and London: Yale University Press 1984

    42 Burns, Robert, "China Nuclear Assurance to Rumsfeld" 2005

    43 Buckley, Chris, "Calling in envoy, Beijing assails Pentagon report" 2005

    44 "Bush Vows‘ To Do Whatever It Takes’To Defend Taiwan"

    45 Lewis, John W, "Beijing’s Defense Establishment: Solving the Arms-Export Dilemma" 15 (15): 1991

    46 U.S. Department of Defense, "Annual Report to Contress: The Military Power of the People’s Republic of China 2002" 2002

    47 U.S. Department of Defense, "Annual Report to Congress: The Military Power of the People’s Republic of China 2005" 2005

    48 Keefe, John, "A Tale of ‘Two Very Stories’Redux" 2002

    49 Harding, Harry, "A Fragile Relationship: The United States and China since 1972" Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press 1992

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-03-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Studies -> Korean Journal of International Relations KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-12-01 등재 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Relations -> The Korean Journal of International Studies KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 1.12
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.07 1.09 1.415 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼