RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    세계화 시대의 유럽법과 동아시아-과제와 전망 : 경제통합과 법의 통합 -동아시아의 관점에서 본 EU법- = EU Law & East Asia in the Age of Globalization-Agenda for the Future : Economic Integration and Integration of Law -EU Law as seen from the East Asian point of View-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76384931

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The world trend of globalization and information society caused the official conference in East Asia 2000, so called `ASEAN plus Three`. When we talk about the integration of East Asia, East Asia is differently said to be East Asia, Northeast Asia, the Asia-Pacific, and things like that. But any way it was mainly discussion about South-Korea, China, and Japan including other asian countries. However there were academic efforts to analyse East Asia into a single unit, it is impossible for East Asia to trace the experience of Integration of Europe as it is, which lasted more than 50 years. During the integration of european countries broke obsession with modern nation state and boundaries of countries, East Asian countries nowadays establish democracy and the rule of law, the situation of which is even more solidly, should find the way of integration. The features of the economic integration of Europe means the integration of legal system. This proposition should be taken into account along with discussing about the formation of the future East Asian community. The European Union started originally as a economic community. But she could not have developed today in a stable and sustainable way, without support of her own legal system. In this context, the European Union is the Law Community. The EU law system as a new self regulated law system is superior to that of member state. This discourse could be applied to the future of economic integration in East Asia too, because our legal system is more and more similar in the era of globalization. In first place, principles of law for integration could be attractive for the East Asia countries. Because of its flexible characteristics, principles of law could be considered as useful means, with which we can find the direction of integration in the East Asia.
    번역하기

    The world trend of globalization and information society caused the official conference in East Asia 2000, so called `ASEAN plus Three`. When we talk about the integration of East Asia, East Asia is differently said to be East Asia, Northeast Asia, th...

    The world trend of globalization and information society caused the official conference in East Asia 2000, so called `ASEAN plus Three`. When we talk about the integration of East Asia, East Asia is differently said to be East Asia, Northeast Asia, the Asia-Pacific, and things like that. But any way it was mainly discussion about South-Korea, China, and Japan including other asian countries. However there were academic efforts to analyse East Asia into a single unit, it is impossible for East Asia to trace the experience of Integration of Europe as it is, which lasted more than 50 years. During the integration of european countries broke obsession with modern nation state and boundaries of countries, East Asian countries nowadays establish democracy and the rule of law, the situation of which is even more solidly, should find the way of integration. The features of the economic integration of Europe means the integration of legal system. This proposition should be taken into account along with discussing about the formation of the future East Asian community. The European Union started originally as a economic community. But she could not have developed today in a stable and sustainable way, without support of her own legal system. In this context, the European Union is the Law Community. The EU law system as a new self regulated law system is superior to that of member state. This discourse could be applied to the future of economic integration in East Asia too, because our legal system is more and more similar in the era of globalization. In first place, principles of law for integration could be attractive for the East Asia countries. Because of its flexible characteristics, principles of law could be considered as useful means, with which we can find the direction of integration in the East Asia.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "Zur wirtschaftsverwaltungsrechtlichen Bedeutung des Rechtsstaatsprinzips"

    2 K?ler/Heinze/Hromadka, "Zur gemeinschaftsrechtlichen Kodifizierung und Konkretisierung des Wirtschaftsverwaltungsrechts ; FS S?lner, Europas universale rechtsordnungspolitische Aufgabe im Recht des dritten Jahrtausends"

    3 Jarass, "Wirtschaftsverwaltungsrecht mit Wirtschaftsverfassungsrecht, 3. Aufl., Neuwied u.a"

    4 Nooteboom, "Wie wird man Europ?r?"

    5 Bach, "Wettbewerbsrechtliche Schranken f? staatliche Ma?ahmen nach europ?schem Gemeinschaftsrecht"

    6 Monopolkommission, "Wettbewerbspolitik vor neuen Herausforderungen, 8. Hauptgutachten 1988/89"

    7 Wolff, "Verwaltungsrecht Band1, 11. Aufl."

    8 Petersmann, "Thesen zur Wirtschaftsverfassung der EG, in: EuZW"

    9 Koller, "Theorie des Rechts, Wien/Koln/Weimar"

    10 Alexy, "Theorie der Grundrechte, Frankfurt a. M., 3. Aufl."

    1 "Zur wirtschaftsverwaltungsrechtlichen Bedeutung des Rechtsstaatsprinzips"

    2 K?ler/Heinze/Hromadka, "Zur gemeinschaftsrechtlichen Kodifizierung und Konkretisierung des Wirtschaftsverwaltungsrechts ; FS S?lner, Europas universale rechtsordnungspolitische Aufgabe im Recht des dritten Jahrtausends"

    3 Jarass, "Wirtschaftsverwaltungsrecht mit Wirtschaftsverfassungsrecht, 3. Aufl., Neuwied u.a"

    4 Nooteboom, "Wie wird man Europ?r?"

    5 Bach, "Wettbewerbsrechtliche Schranken f? staatliche Ma?ahmen nach europ?schem Gemeinschaftsrecht"

    6 Monopolkommission, "Wettbewerbspolitik vor neuen Herausforderungen, 8. Hauptgutachten 1988/89"

    7 Wolff, "Verwaltungsrecht Band1, 11. Aufl."

    8 Petersmann, "Thesen zur Wirtschaftsverfassung der EG, in: EuZW"

    9 Koller, "Theorie des Rechts, Wien/Koln/Weimar"

    10 Alexy, "Theorie der Grundrechte, Frankfurt a. M., 3. Aufl."

    11 Lepsius, "The ability of European Constitution to forge a European Identity ; Governing Europe under a Constitution" 2006

    12 Dworkin, "Taking Rights seriously" 1978

    13 Pieper, "Subsidiaritat ? Ein Beitrag zur Begrenzung der Gemeinschaftskompotenzen"

    14 Maurer, "Staatsrecht"

    15 Ruland, "Solidarit, in: NJW"

    16 Ule, "Rechtsstaat und Verwaltung"

    17 Park, "Rechtsfindung im Verwaltungsrecht"

    18 Borowsky, "Prinzipien als Grundrechtsnormen, in: Z? 53"

    19 Blanke, "Normativit? und Justitiabilit? des gemeinschaftsrechtlichen Subsidiarit?sprinzips, in: ZG"

    20 Aktionsplan f? den Binnenmarkt, "Mitteilung der Kommission an den Europ?schen Rat. Abgedruckt in: Bulletin EU 6-1997, Binnenmarkt(2/27); Europe. Dokumente Nr. 2039/2040 v. 12. Juni 1997"

    21 Zacker, "Kompendium Europarecht, 1. Aufl."

    22 Callies/Ruffert, "Kommentar des Vertrages ?er die Europ?sche Union und des Vertrages zur Gr?dung der Europ?schen Gemeinschaft EUV/EGV, Neuwied u.a"

    23 Europ?sche Kommission: 15, "Jahresbericht ?er die Kontrolle der Anwendung des Gemeinschaftsrechts 1997, in: ABl. der EG, C 250"

    24 "Handbuch des Wirtschaftsverwaltungs und Umweltrechts"

    25 Pernice, "Grundrechtgehalte im Europ?schen Gemeinschaftsrecht: Ein Beitrag zum gemeinschaftsimmanenten Grundrechtsschutz durch den Europ?schen Gerichtshof"

    26 "Globalisierung der Wirtschaft und Rechtsprinzipien des Weltwirtschaftsrechts"

    27 "Globales Wirtschaftsverwaltungsrecht"

    28 Borries, "Gleichwertigkeitsklauseln als Instrument zur Gew?rleistung des freien Warenverkehrs (mit Matthias Petschke), in: DVBl"

    29 Schroter, "GTE, Kommentar zum Eu/EG Vertrag, 5. Aufl."

    30 Wieacker, "Foundations of european legal culture; European legal cultures"

    31 Sch?er, "Europarecht: Das Wirtschaftsrecht der EG"

    32 Streinz, "Europarecht, 6. Aufl."

    33 Schweitzer/Hummer, "Europarecht, 5. Aufl., Neuwied u.a"

    34 Nicolaysen, "Europarecht II"

    35 Nicolaysen, "Europa Handbuch"

    36 Bogdandy, "Europ?sche Prinzipienlehre, Europ?sches Verfassungsrecht, Frankfurt a.M"

    37 Rabe, "Europ?sche Gesetzgebung Das unbekannte Wesen, NJW"

    38 장경원, "EU행정법의 작동원리로서 보충성의 원칙" (17) : 2007

    39 Geiger, "EUV/EGV (Kommentar), 4. Aufl., M?chen"

    40 Borchardt, "Die rechtlichen Grundlagen der Europ?schen Union, Heidelberg u.a"

    41 Calliess, "Die neue Querschnittsklausel des Art. 6 ex 3c EGV, in: DVBl"

    42 Chang, "Die Vergemeinschaftung des deutschen Wirtschaftsverwaltungsrecht, K?n/Berlin/M?chen"

    43 Ipsen, "Die Verfassungsrolle des Europaischen Gerichtshofs fur die Integration ; Der Europaische Gerichtshof als Verfassungsgericht und Rechtsschutzinstanz, BadenBaden"

    44 Eberharter, "Die Idee Mitteleuropas in den achtziger und neunziger Jahren ; Europas Mitte, Mitteleuropa, Europ?sche Identit?, Berlin"

    45 Hallstein, "Die EWG eine Rechtsgemeinschaft, Ehrenpromotion, Universitat Padua am 12. Marz 1962 ; Europaische Reden, Stuttgart 1979; Die Europaische Gemeinschaft, 5. Aufl., Dusseldorf u.a"

    46 Grunwald, "Die EG als Rechtsgemeinschaft ; Handbuch der Europ?schen Integration Strategie, Struktur, Politik der Europ?schen Union, Wien/Manz u.a"

    47 Hirsch, "Die Auswirkungen des Subsidiarit?sprinzips auf die Rechtssetzungsbefugnis der EG, Saabr?ken"

    48 Oppermann, "Die 3. Gewalt in der EU, in: DVBl"

    49 Van der Esch, "Der Stellenwert des unverf?schten Wettbewerbs in der Rechtsprechung des Europ?schen Gerichtshofes und der Verwaltungspraxis der Kommission"

    50 L?, "Der Rechtsschutz des Konkurrenten gegen?er Subventionen aus gemeinschaftlicher Sicht"

    51 Lecheler, "Das Subsidiaritatsprinzip Strukturprinzip einer Europaischen Union"

    52 Kunig, "Das Rechtsstaatsprinzip"

    53 Chloros, "Common law, civil law and socialist law: three leading systems of the world, three kind of legal thought" 1978

    54 L?fer, "Charta der Grundrechte der EU"

    55 Sch?z, "Cassis de Dijon, in: Jura"

    56 Cremer, "Callies/Ruffert, EUV/EGV, Art.87"

    57 M?ler-Graff, "Binnenmarktziel und Rechtsordnung: Binnenmarktrecht, Schriftenreihe K?ner Juristische Gesellschaft (Band 8)"

    58 Stumpf, "Aufgabe und Befugnis"

    59 Stober, "Allgemeines Wirtschaftsverwaltungsrecht, 14. Aufl."

    60 Europarecht, "2.Aufl"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.55 1.55 1.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.24 1.24 1.583 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼