RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    우리나라 기업합병시 의제배당의 적용현황 분석과 개선방안 = Analysis and Suggestion of the Taxation on the Constructive Dividend in M&A

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104295394

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigates the actual state of the stock reduction to evade taxes on the constructive dividend in M&A and suggests the improvement by using the data from 2000 to March 2006 in Korean Securities Market and KOSDAQ. The study reveals that the average estimated amount of constructive dividend is approximately 5 million won while the estimated capital gain is 225 million won ,which means only a small portion of the amount is included to be taxed in the course of M&A. This figure is quite the same in the KOSDAQ which shows 4.5 million and 140 million won respectively. The estimated amount of constructive dividend even decreased to 0.3 million won from 78 million won on average after the stock reduction was implemented in the process of M&A. The number of firms which wrote down the capital is 17 and 16 of the firms showed the zero amount of constructive dividend. This manifests itself that firms take the most of the current tax laws which allow the stock price at par in computing the amount of constructive dividend in M&A. The suggestions for the improvement of the current tax laws regarding the computation of the constructive dividend amount in M&A are as follows :The conditions of evaluating the stock price at par must be enforced to prevent the tax evasion by regulating the minimum holding period of stocks received in return for the targeted stocks given.Transactions which are the same in substance must be treated equal regardless of the forms of transaction. We suggest that capital gains tax must be levied both on constructive dividend and on stock exchange. However, it can be solved, for the time being, by enlarging the scope of the taxpayers. All the stocks received by the shareholders in target corporations must be taxed without exceptions.<Key words> M&A, constructive dividend, stock reduction
    번역하기

    This study investigates the actual state of the stock reduction to evade taxes on the constructive dividend in M&A and suggests the improvement by using the data from 2000 to March 2006 in Korean Securities Market and KOSDAQ. The study reveals that th...

    This study investigates the actual state of the stock reduction to evade taxes on the constructive dividend in M&A and suggests the improvement by using the data from 2000 to March 2006 in Korean Securities Market and KOSDAQ. The study reveals that the average estimated amount of constructive dividend is approximately 5 million won while the estimated capital gain is 225 million won ,which means only a small portion of the amount is included to be taxed in the course of M&A. This figure is quite the same in the KOSDAQ which shows 4.5 million and 140 million won respectively. The estimated amount of constructive dividend even decreased to 0.3 million won from 78 million won on average after the stock reduction was implemented in the process of M&A. The number of firms which wrote down the capital is 17 and 16 of the firms showed the zero amount of constructive dividend. This manifests itself that firms take the most of the current tax laws which allow the stock price at par in computing the amount of constructive dividend in M&A. The suggestions for the improvement of the current tax laws regarding the computation of the constructive dividend amount in M&A are as follows :The conditions of evaluating the stock price at par must be enforced to prevent the tax evasion by regulating the minimum holding period of stocks received in return for the targeted stocks given.Transactions which are the same in substance must be treated equal regardless of the forms of transaction. We suggest that capital gains tax must be levied both on constructive dividend and on stock exchange. However, it can be solved, for the time being, by enlarging the scope of the taxpayers. All the stocks received by the shareholders in target corporations must be taxed without exceptions.<Key words> M&A, constructive dividend, stock reduction

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박성배, "합병회계준칙 및 합병과세제도에 대한 분석적 고찰" (13) : 347-371, 1999

    2 박인주, "합병에 따른 의제배당과 과세의 공평성 -소득세법의 규정을 중심으로-" 1994

    3 강명수, "합병관련 과세제도" 한국기업법학회 19 (19): 69-92, 2005

    4 이은상, "합병과세의 문제점" 9 (9): 15-37, 2000

    5 권재열, "주식회사에서의 자본감소의 목적와 행태에 관한 소고 -기업구조조정에 관련된 법률을 중심으로-" 19 (19): 283-312, 2001

    6 채수열, "의제배당과세론 -의제배당이 과세소득인지를 중심으로-" (14) : 399-426, 1999

    7 신현걸, "우리나라 기업합병의 현황분석을 통한 합병회계 및 합병세제의 개선방안" 14 : 105-128, 2005

    8 김두환, "상법상 자본감소에 관한 논고-방법과 절차를 중심으로-" 1986

    9 김상호, "기업합병세제의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 18 (18): 1981-2000, 2005

    10 박정우, "기업결합 수단별 조세부담 비교를 통한 바람직한 합병세제 개선안의 도출" 20 (20): 33-62, 2003

    1 박성배, "합병회계준칙 및 합병과세제도에 대한 분석적 고찰" (13) : 347-371, 1999

    2 박인주, "합병에 따른 의제배당과 과세의 공평성 -소득세법의 규정을 중심으로-" 1994

    3 강명수, "합병관련 과세제도" 한국기업법학회 19 (19): 69-92, 2005

    4 이은상, "합병과세의 문제점" 9 (9): 15-37, 2000

    5 권재열, "주식회사에서의 자본감소의 목적와 행태에 관한 소고 -기업구조조정에 관련된 법률을 중심으로-" 19 (19): 283-312, 2001

    6 채수열, "의제배당과세론 -의제배당이 과세소득인지를 중심으로-" (14) : 399-426, 1999

    7 신현걸, "우리나라 기업합병의 현황분석을 통한 합병회계 및 합병세제의 개선방안" 14 : 105-128, 2005

    8 김두환, "상법상 자본감소에 관한 논고-방법과 절차를 중심으로-" 1986

    9 김상호, "기업합병세제의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 18 (18): 1981-2000, 2005

    10 박정우, "기업결합 수단별 조세부담 비교를 통한 바람직한 합병세제 개선안의 도출" 20 (20): 33-62, 2003

    11 Scholes, M.S, "Taxes and Business Strategy" Prentice Hall 2004

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.98 0.98 1.03
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.37 1.48 1.713 0.03
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼