RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한반도 평화협정 체결관련 안보대책 방향 = Peace Agreement on the Korean Peninsula and the Korean National Security Policy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75062958

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Since the <2·13 agreement) of the 6-party talks was concluded, the peace agreement issue on the Korean peninsula has become more and more important. In the past, North Korea has proposed many ideas on peace regime building between South and North Korea. But most of these ideas were not for real peace, but for pseudo peace on the Korean peninsula. North Korea's main purpose to proposing pseudo peace on the Korean peninsula was to withdraw U.S. Forces in South Korea and weaken the national security power of South Korea. However, the Roh Moohyen government does not doubt the peace regime that the North Korean government has proposed, and misunderstands that the North Korea's ideas for peace on the peninsula are real. The Roh Moohyen government has kept a beautiful conviction that the peace agreement between Koreas will eliminate every conflict and war on the Korean peninsula and produce cooperation and co-prosperity between both Koreas.
      We should keep in mind the following things relating to peace agreement on the Korean peninsula. The first one is that South and North Korea have kept different concepts of peace on the Korean peninsula though they use the same phrase 'peace on the peninsula.' North Korea defines 'peace on the Korean peninsula' as an independent state/situation after the U.S. forces have been withdrawn from the peninsula. Such an unreasonable definition of peace on the Korean peninsula of North Korea should be corrected as a normal/general definition of peace.
      Secondly, peace agreement issue on the Korean peninsula will be influenced by the implementation of the <2 ·13 Agreement>. We don't know exactly whether the implementation of the <2 ·13 Agreement> will be successfully carried out or not. Third, the peace agreement should keep the following contents: ending hostile actions between both Koreas, transforming ceasefire into the peace regime, seeking ways of peacekeeping on the peninsula, promoting arms control, and compensating for the Korean war, etc.
      Fourth, the countries concerned in the peace agreement should be both Koreas, the United States and China. Fifth, the withdrawal of U.S. forces should be excluded from peace agreement issues on the peninsula. Finally, there is high possibility of building the pseudo peace regime between South and North Korea however, we should not create such a regime on the Korean peninsula.
      번역하기

      Since the <2·13 agreement) of the 6-party talks was concluded, the peace agreement issue on the Korean peninsula has become more and more important. In the past, North Korea has proposed many ideas on peace regime building between South and North ...

      Since the <2·13 agreement) of the 6-party talks was concluded, the peace agreement issue on the Korean peninsula has become more and more important. In the past, North Korea has proposed many ideas on peace regime building between South and North Korea. But most of these ideas were not for real peace, but for pseudo peace on the Korean peninsula. North Korea's main purpose to proposing pseudo peace on the Korean peninsula was to withdraw U.S. Forces in South Korea and weaken the national security power of South Korea. However, the Roh Moohyen government does not doubt the peace regime that the North Korean government has proposed, and misunderstands that the North Korea's ideas for peace on the peninsula are real. The Roh Moohyen government has kept a beautiful conviction that the peace agreement between Koreas will eliminate every conflict and war on the Korean peninsula and produce cooperation and co-prosperity between both Koreas.
      We should keep in mind the following things relating to peace agreement on the Korean peninsula. The first one is that South and North Korea have kept different concepts of peace on the Korean peninsula though they use the same phrase 'peace on the peninsula.' North Korea defines 'peace on the Korean peninsula' as an independent state/situation after the U.S. forces have been withdrawn from the peninsula. Such an unreasonable definition of peace on the Korean peninsula of North Korea should be corrected as a normal/general definition of peace.
      Secondly, peace agreement issue on the Korean peninsula will be influenced by the implementation of the <2 ·13 Agreement>. We don't know exactly whether the implementation of the <2 ·13 Agreement> will be successfully carried out or not. Third, the peace agreement should keep the following contents: ending hostile actions between both Koreas, transforming ceasefire into the peace regime, seeking ways of peacekeeping on the peninsula, promoting arms control, and compensating for the Korean war, etc.
      Fourth, the countries concerned in the peace agreement should be both Koreas, the United States and China. Fifth, the withdrawal of U.S. forces should be excluded from peace agreement issues on the peninsula. Finally, there is high possibility of building the pseudo peace regime between South and North Korea however, we should not create such a regime on the Korean peninsula.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 문제 제기
      • II. 한반도 평화협정체결: 약사 및 현주소
      • III. 한반도 평화협정체결: 가능성 및 제약성
      • IV. 한반도 평화협정 체결과 안보대책
      • V. 요약 및 결론
      • I. 문제 제기
      • II. 한반도 평화협정체결: 약사 및 현주소
      • III. 한반도 평화협정체결: 가능성 및 제약성
      • IV. 한반도 평화협정 체결과 안보대책
      • V. 요약 및 결론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼