RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국의 저서성 대형무척추동물 생태점수 개선 = Revision of Ecological Score of Benthic Macroinvertebrates Community in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105366162

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In 1997, the environmental score (Q) corresponding the tolerance value of Korean benthic macroinvertebrate species and the related biotic score, the ecological score of benthic macroinvertebrates (ESB) were proposed; ESB was similar to Beck's biotic index or Chandler's biotic score. This study was carried out to revise the Q values of individual species and the assessment scheme of ESB based on the taxonomic performance and ecological information accumulated since then. The original ESB was renamed as TESB (total ESB), and AESB (average ESB) was newly proposed. AESB is calculated by dividing the TESB (for a given station) by the number of species present in the sample. In this study, TESB showed a positively skewed distribution, while AESB showed a negatively skewed distribution. The correlation between TESB and the concentration of BOD5 was a little stronger than that of the original ESB. TESB showed a very strong correlation (correlation coefficient r=0.98) with Margalef's species richness, of which correlation coefficient was higher than that of AESB (r=0.85). AESB showed a strong correlation (r=-0.79) with the concentration of BOD5, while TESB showed a weaker correlation (r = -0.67). Applying TESB and AESB together in an assessment of the environment may be comprehensive because the physical and chemical states of the environment can be evaluated together. AESB is less dependent on the sample size, while TESB tends to increase as the sample size increases. In the evaluation of the environment using TESB, it is necessary to standardize the methods on monitoring.
      번역하기

      In 1997, the environmental score (Q) corresponding the tolerance value of Korean benthic macroinvertebrate species and the related biotic score, the ecological score of benthic macroinvertebrates (ESB) were proposed; ESB was similar to Beck's biotic i...

      In 1997, the environmental score (Q) corresponding the tolerance value of Korean benthic macroinvertebrate species and the related biotic score, the ecological score of benthic macroinvertebrates (ESB) were proposed; ESB was similar to Beck's biotic index or Chandler's biotic score. This study was carried out to revise the Q values of individual species and the assessment scheme of ESB based on the taxonomic performance and ecological information accumulated since then. The original ESB was renamed as TESB (total ESB), and AESB (average ESB) was newly proposed. AESB is calculated by dividing the TESB (for a given station) by the number of species present in the sample. In this study, TESB showed a positively skewed distribution, while AESB showed a negatively skewed distribution. The correlation between TESB and the concentration of BOD5 was a little stronger than that of the original ESB. TESB showed a very strong correlation (correlation coefficient r=0.98) with Margalef's species richness, of which correlation coefficient was higher than that of AESB (r=0.85). AESB showed a strong correlation (r=-0.79) with the concentration of BOD5, while TESB showed a weaker correlation (r = -0.67). Applying TESB and AESB together in an assessment of the environment may be comprehensive because the physical and chemical states of the environment can be evaluated together. AESB is less dependent on the sample size, while TESB tends to increase as the sample size increases. In the evaluation of the environment using TESB, it is necessary to standardize the methods on monitoring.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 공동수, "하천환경의 생물학적 평가를 위한 저서동물지수(BMI)의 개발" 한국물환경학회 34 (34): 183-201, 2018

      2 김아름, "저서성 대형무척추동물을 이용한 환경평가에서 표본크기가 미치는 영향" 한국물환경학회 29 (29): 790-798, 2013

      3 원두희, "저서성 대형무척추동물을 이용한 한국오수생물지수의 개발과 생물학적 하천환경평가 적용" 한국물환경학회 22 (22): 768-783, 2006

      4 공동수, "와이블 분포함수를 이용한 저서성 대형무척추동물의 종수-조사면적 관계 해석" 한국물환경학회 31 (31): 142-150, 2015

      5 공동수, "수학적 모형을 이용한 저서성 대형무척추동물 군집지수-조사면적 관계 해석" 한국물환경학회 31 (31): 610-618, 2015

      6 공동수, "가평천 저서성 대형무척추동물의 물리적 서식처 적합성 평가" 한국물환경학회 33 (33): 311-325, 2017

      7 Zelinka, M., "Zur Prazisierung der Biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheid Fliessender Gewasser" 57 (57): 389-407, 1961

      8 Murphy, P. M., "The Temporal Variability in Biotic Indices" 17 (17): 227-236, 1978

      9 Sladecek, V., "The Measures of Saprobity" 17 : 546-559, 1969

      10 Shannon, C. E., "The Mathematical Theory of Communication" University of Illinois Press 1949

      1 공동수, "하천환경의 생물학적 평가를 위한 저서동물지수(BMI)의 개발" 한국물환경학회 34 (34): 183-201, 2018

      2 김아름, "저서성 대형무척추동물을 이용한 환경평가에서 표본크기가 미치는 영향" 한국물환경학회 29 (29): 790-798, 2013

      3 원두희, "저서성 대형무척추동물을 이용한 한국오수생물지수의 개발과 생물학적 하천환경평가 적용" 한국물환경학회 22 (22): 768-783, 2006

      4 공동수, "와이블 분포함수를 이용한 저서성 대형무척추동물의 종수-조사면적 관계 해석" 한국물환경학회 31 (31): 142-150, 2015

      5 공동수, "수학적 모형을 이용한 저서성 대형무척추동물 군집지수-조사면적 관계 해석" 한국물환경학회 31 (31): 610-618, 2015

      6 공동수, "가평천 저서성 대형무척추동물의 물리적 서식처 적합성 평가" 한국물환경학회 33 (33): 311-325, 2017

      7 Zelinka, M., "Zur Prazisierung der Biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheid Fliessender Gewasser" 57 (57): 389-407, 1961

      8 Murphy, P. M., "The Temporal Variability in Biotic Indices" 17 (17): 227-236, 1978

      9 Sladecek, V., "The Measures of Saprobity" 17 : 546-559, 1969

      10 Shannon, C. E., "The Mathematical Theory of Communication" University of Illinois Press 1949

      11 Staub, R., "The Effects of Industrial Wastes of Memphis and Shelby County on Primary Planktonic Producers" 20 (20): 905-912, 1970

      12 Sladecek, V., "System of Water Quality from Biological Point of View" 7 : 1-218, 1973

      13 Beck, W. M., "Suggested Method for Reporting Biotic Data" 27 (27): 1193-1197, 1955

      14 Yoon, I. B., "Studies on the Biological Evaluation of Water Quality by Benthic Macroinvertebrates (3) Macroscopic Simple Water Quality Evaluation" 10 (10): 77-84, 1992

      15 Yoon, I. B., "Studies on the Biological Evaluation of Water Quality by Benthic Macroinvertebrates (2) Effects of Environmental Factors to Community" 10 (10): 40-55, 1992

      16 Yoon, I. B., "Studies on the Biological Evaluation of Water Quality by Benthic Macroinvertebrates (1) Saprobic Valency and Indicative Value" 10 (10): 24-49, 1992

      17 McNaughton, S. J., "Relationship among Functional Properties of California Grassland" 216 : 168-169, 1967

      18 Rorslett, B., "Principal Determinants of Aquatic Macrophyte Richness in Northern European Lakes" 39 : 173-193, 1991

      19 Hawkes H. A., "Origin and Development of the Biological Monitoring Working Party Score System" 32 (32): 964-968, 1997

      20 Kolkwitz, R., "Okologie der tierischen Saprobien" 2 : 126-152, 1909

      21 Kolkwitz, R., "Okologie der pflanzlichen Saprobien" 26 (26): 505-519, 1908

      22 Margalef, R., "Information Theory in Ecology" 3 : 36-71, 1958

      23 Kolkwitz, R., "Grundsatze fur die biologische Beurteilung des Wassers nach seiner Flora and Fauna" 1 : 33-72, 1902

      24 Flather, C. H., "Fitting Species-accumulation Functions and Assessing Regional Land Use Impacts on Avian Diversity" 23 : 155-168, 1996

      25 Organization for Economic Co-operation., "Eutrophication of Waters. Monitoring, Assessment and Control, OECD Cooperative Programme on Monitoring of Inland Waters" 1-154, 1982

      26 Kong, D., "Developement and Application of Korean Benthic Macroinvertebrates Index for Biological Assessment on Stream Environment" Korean Society of Limnology 33-36, 2012

      27 National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), "Biomonitering Survey and Assessment Manual, NIER 2016-372" 2016

      28 Tsuda, M., "Biology of Polluted Waters" Hokuryu-kan 1-258, 1964

      29 Balloch, D., "Biological Assessment of Water Quality in 3 British Rivers: the North Esk (Scotland), the Ivel (England) and the Taf (Wales)" 75 : 92-114, 1976

      30 Kong, D., "Benthic Macroinvertebrate Fauna of Yesan, Seosan, Hongseong and Mountain Kayasan, Natural Environment of Yesan, Seosan, Hongseong (6-11, 12)" 155-204, 1997

      31 Kong, D., "Assessment and Restoration of Aquatic Environment Using Benthos-Biomonitoring, Biomanipulation, Ecotechnology-" Korean Entomological Institute, Korea University 69-92, 1999

      32 Walley, W. J., "A Computer-based Reappraisal of the Biological Monitoring Working Party Scores Using Data from the 1990 River Quality Survey of England and Wales" 30 (30): 2086-2094, 1996

      33 Chandler, J. R., "A Biological Approach to Water Quality Management" 69 (69): 415-422, 1970

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 학술지명변경 한글명 : 수질보전 한국물환경학회지 -> 한국물환경학회지
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment
      KCI등재
      2011-12-27 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Society on Water Quality -> Korean Society on Water Environment KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-07-22 학회명변경 영문명 : Journal Of Korean Society On Water Qulity -> Korean Society on Water Quality KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.51 0.51 0.46
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.43 0.39 0.613 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼