RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    우리나라 제조기업의 녹색 공급망 관리 기법의 도입과 기업성과에 대한 영향

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101952297

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study empirically investigated the relationships among external factors (i.e., the imitation, compulsory and normative pressures, and governmental regulation), proactive environmental strategy, the adoption of green-supply chain management (GSCM) techniques, green corporation with suppliers, environmental performance, and organizational performance. To empirically demonstrate the relationships, 78 sample firms’ data were collected from Korean manufacturing firms that are listed on the Korean stock market. The results of this study showed that a proactive environmental strategy mainly and positively influences the adoption of GSCM, and the introduction of a proactive environmental strategy is significantly and positively affected by governmental regulation. It was also found that governmental regulation has an indirect impact on the adoption of GSCM through the introduction of a proactive environmental strategy. Thus, it is asserted that governmental regulation, in Korean manufacturing firms, is the unique external factor on the adoption of a proactive environmental strategy, which facilitates the use of GSCM techniques. According to the results, it was observed that GSCM positively influences the levels of green corporation, and both GSCM and green corporation have positive effects on the improvement of environmental performance. Hence, it is suggested that the implementation of GSCM inevitably brings high degrees of green collaboration with suppliers. Finally, it was found that environmental performance has a significant and positive impact on the organizational performance of a firm. This result implies that high degrees of environmental performance, which bring both the efficient usage of materials and energy and the elimination of wastes, can lead to the increase of organizational performance.
    번역하기

    This study empirically investigated the relationships among external factors (i.e., the imitation, compulsory and normative pressures, and governmental regulation), proactive environmental strategy, the adoption of green-supply chain management (GSCM)...

    This study empirically investigated the relationships among external factors (i.e., the imitation, compulsory and normative pressures, and governmental regulation), proactive environmental strategy, the adoption of green-supply chain management (GSCM) techniques, green corporation with suppliers, environmental performance, and organizational performance. To empirically demonstrate the relationships, 78 sample firms’ data were collected from Korean manufacturing firms that are listed on the Korean stock market. The results of this study showed that a proactive environmental strategy mainly and positively influences the adoption of GSCM, and the introduction of a proactive environmental strategy is significantly and positively affected by governmental regulation. It was also found that governmental regulation has an indirect impact on the adoption of GSCM through the introduction of a proactive environmental strategy. Thus, it is asserted that governmental regulation, in Korean manufacturing firms, is the unique external factor on the adoption of a proactive environmental strategy, which facilitates the use of GSCM techniques. According to the results, it was observed that GSCM positively influences the levels of green corporation, and both GSCM and green corporation have positive effects on the improvement of environmental performance. Hence, it is suggested that the implementation of GSCM inevitably brings high degrees of green collaboration with suppliers. Finally, it was found that environmental performance has a significant and positive impact on the organizational performance of a firm. This result implies that high degrees of environmental performance, which bring both the efficient usage of materials and energy and the elimination of wastes, can lead to the increase of organizational performance.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 이론적 배경과 가설 설정
    • 3. 연구방법
    • 4. 실증분석 결과
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 이론적 배경과 가설 설정
    • 3. 연구방법
    • 4. 실증분석 결과
    • 5. 연구 결론과 논의
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김종대, "한국 기업의 환경정보 공시 실태분석" 12 (12): 1-20, 1999

    2 민재형, "지속가능경영을 위한 기업의 환경적, 사회적, 지배구조적 요인이 주가수익률 및 기업 가치에 미치는 영향" 한국경영과학회 39 (39): 33-49, 2014

    3 최종민, "우리나라 제조기업의 환경경영시스템 도입에 대한 영향요인 연구" 한국경영과학회 31 (31): 15-32, 2014

    4 김보경, "기업의 사회적 책임이 신뢰와 기업-소비자 동일시를 통해 고객충성도에 미치는 영향" 한국경영과학회 31 (31): 117-134, 2014

    5 Sharfman, P., "The road to cooperative supply-chain environmental management : Trust and uncertainty among pro-active firms" 18 : 1-13, 2009

    6 Wolf, J., "The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance" 119 : 317-328, 2014

    7 Powell, W., "The new institutionalism in organizational analysis" University of Chicago Press 1991

    8 Johnstone, N., "The firm, environmental management and environmental measures : Lessons from a survey of European manufacturing firms" 47 (47): 685-707, 2004

    9 Lee, S.Y., "The change in corporate environmental strategies : A longitudinal empirical study" 45 : 196-216, 2007

    10 Linton, D., "Sustainable supply chains : An introduction" 25 : 1075-1082, 2007

    1 김종대, "한국 기업의 환경정보 공시 실태분석" 12 (12): 1-20, 1999

    2 민재형, "지속가능경영을 위한 기업의 환경적, 사회적, 지배구조적 요인이 주가수익률 및 기업 가치에 미치는 영향" 한국경영과학회 39 (39): 33-49, 2014

    3 최종민, "우리나라 제조기업의 환경경영시스템 도입에 대한 영향요인 연구" 한국경영과학회 31 (31): 15-32, 2014

    4 김보경, "기업의 사회적 책임이 신뢰와 기업-소비자 동일시를 통해 고객충성도에 미치는 영향" 한국경영과학회 31 (31): 117-134, 2014

    5 Sharfman, P., "The road to cooperative supply-chain environmental management : Trust and uncertainty among pro-active firms" 18 : 1-13, 2009

    6 Wolf, J., "The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance" 119 : 317-328, 2014

    7 Powell, W., "The new institutionalism in organizational analysis" University of Chicago Press 1991

    8 Johnstone, N., "The firm, environmental management and environmental measures : Lessons from a survey of European manufacturing firms" 47 (47): 685-707, 2004

    9 Lee, S.Y., "The change in corporate environmental strategies : A longitudinal empirical study" 45 : 196-216, 2007

    10 Linton, D., "Sustainable supply chains : An introduction" 25 : 1075-1082, 2007

    11 Liu, X., "Sustainable production : Practices and determinant factors of green supply chain management of Chinese companies" 21 : 1-16, 2012

    12 Youn, S. H., "Supply chain information capabilities and performance outcomes : An empirical study of Korean steel suppliers" 34 : 369-380, 2014

    13 Cao, M., "Supply chain collaboration : Impact on collaboration advantage and firm performance" 29 : 163-180, 2011

    14 Geffen, A., "Suppliers and environmental innovation" 20 (20): 166-186, 2000

    15 Link, S., "Standardization and discretion : Does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits?" 53 (53): 508-519, 2006

    16 Burt, R., "Social contagion and innovation :cohesion versus structural equivalence" 92 (92): 1287-1335, 1987

    17 Gholami, R., "Senior managers’ perception on green information systems adoption and environmental performance : results from a field survey" 50 : 431-438, 2013

    18 Reid, M., "Responding to public and private politics : Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies" 30 : 1157-1178, 2009

    19 Muller, C., "Pushing or sharing as value-driven strategies for societal change in global supply chains : Two case studies in the British-South African fresh fruit supply chain" 21 : 127-140, 2012

    20 Hair, J., "Multivariate Data analysis" Prentice Hall 2005

    21 Carbone, V., "Mapping corporate responsibility and sustainable supply chains : an exploratory perspective" 21 : 475-494, 2012

    22 Coad, A., "Inter-organizational cost management : Towards an evolutionary perspective" 17 : 342-369, 2006

    23 Haden, S. P., "Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management" 47 (47): 1041-1055, 2009

    24 Zhu, Q., "Green supply chain management in China : Pressures, practices and performance" 25 (25): 449-468, 2005

    25 Zhu, Q., "Green supply chain management : Pressures, practices and performance within the Chineses automobile industry" 15 : 1041-1052, 2007

    26 Molina-Azorin, F., "Green management and financial performance : A literature review" 47 (47): 1080-1100, 2009

    27 Seuring, S., "From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management" 16 : 1699-1710, 2008

    28 Kim, J, "Factor Analysis : Statistical Methods and Practical Issues" SAGE Publications Inc 1981

    29 Vachon, S., "Extending green practices across the supply chain" 26 (26): 795-821, 2006

    30 Marchi, D., "Environmental strategies, upgrading and competitive advantage in global value chains" 22 : 62-72, 2013

    31 Wong, S., "Environmental requirements, knowledge sharing and green innovation : empirical evidence from the electronic industry in China" 22 : 321-338, 2013

    32 Benito, J., "Environmental proactivity and business performance : An empirical analysis" 33 : 1-15, 2005

    33 Darnall, N., "Environmental management systems and green supply chain management : Complement for sustainability?" 18 : 30-45, 2008

    34 Brammer, S., "Environmental management in SMEs in the UK : Practices, pressure and perceived benefits" 21 : 423-434, 2012

    35 Karagozoglu, N., "Environmental management : testing the win-win model" 43 (43): 817-829, 2000

    36 Forsman, H., "Environmental innovations as a source of competitive advantage or vice versa" 22 : 306-320, 2013

    37 Bonte, W., "Environmental innovations and strategies for the development of new production technologies : empirical evidence from Europe" 22 : 501-516, 2013

    38 Cormier, D., "Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies : Economic incentives, public pressure or institutional conditions?" 14 (14): 3-39, 2005

    39 Zhang, M., "Do suppliers applaud corporate social performance" 121 : 543-557, 2014

    40 Rao, P., "Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?" 25 (25): 898-916, 2005

    41 Lee, K., "Corporate social responsiveness in the Korean electronics industry" 14 : 219-230, 2007

    42 Cruz, L.B., "Corporate social responsibility and green management" 47 (47): 1174-1199, 2009

    43 Zhu, Q., "An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China : Drivers and practices" 14 : 472-486, 2006

    44 Chien, M.K., "An empirical study of the implementation of green supply chain management practices in the electrical and electronic industry and their relation to organizational performance" 4 : 383-394, 2007

    45 Thun, J., "An empirical analysis of green supply chain management in the German automobile industry" 19 : 119-132, 2010

    46 Agarwal, D., "An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Advanced Manufacturing Technology on Business Performance" The City University of New York 1997

    47 Ann, E., "A study on the impact of environmental management system(EMS) certification towards firms’ performance in Malaysia" 17 (17): 73-93, 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.59 0.59 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.63 0.63 0.998 0.07
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼