RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      전망이론과 민군관계: 무력사용을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107313115

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The heinous Axe Murder crime on August 18 in 1976 at JSA (Joint Security Area) within DMZ (demilitarized zone) was the first murder committed by North Korea since the signing of Armistice Agreement in 1953. Whereas this incident was finalized by merely cutting the poplar tree, the U.S. is responding to the murder of its soldiers in Iran, Iraq, Somalia and elsewhere by swift and resolute retaliatory measures. From the perspective of the Civil-Military Relations (CMR), in the course of resolving the Axe Murder case, it appears that Henry Kissinger, then Secretary of State as well as the top diplomat, represented the civilian group in the absence of President Ford, while Richard G. Stilwell, the Commander of CINCUNC-CFC-USFK and active military officer, represented the military establishment during the time of Chief of Joint Chiefs of Staff’s absence. According to the conventional wisdom, within the context of CMR, the civilian elites are expected to play a role of suppressing the trigger-happy tendencies displayed by the military officers. Case in point would be the showdown between Prussia’s Otto von Bismarck and Helmut von Moltke. ‘Iron Chancellor’ Bismark tried his utmost in order to tamp down the zeal of the Prussian Army’s Chief of Staff, who demanded a victorious military parade through the downtown of Vienna right after the stunning victory at the Austro-Prussian War.
      The relation between Kissinger and Stilwell was totally opposite to that of Bismark-Moltke case. While Kissinger revealed that he was willing to take risks for retaliatory measures against North Koreans by showing hostilities toward them, Stilwell who was at the virtual end of more than four-decade of military career took pains to focus on myopic goal of cutting ‘the damn tree’ and on other damage control measures. Therefore, in one sense, whereas Kissinger played the role of military commander, Stilwell played the role of career diplomat. Prospect Theory provides us with an insightful clue as to the dramatic role-reversal between them.
      The purpose of this study is, by applying Prospect Theory, to enhance the understanding and explanatory power by means of examining the potential conflictual relations between the civil-military elites and other related issues revolving around ‘the use of force’ issue with the focus on the case study of Panmunjom Axe Murder Incident. Followed by the Introduction, the Chapter 2 will examine relevant basic concepts of Prospect Theory and explore mutually reinforcing relations between Prospect Theory and CMR. The Chapter 3 will take up the work of case study regarding the Axe Murder Incident in 1976. And finally the Chapter 4 will summarize main findings of the study and delve into the Prospect Theory’s limitations and other theoretical issues to be further refined.
      번역하기

      The heinous Axe Murder crime on August 18 in 1976 at JSA (Joint Security Area) within DMZ (demilitarized zone) was the first murder committed by North Korea since the signing of Armistice Agreement in 1953. Whereas this incident was finalized by merel...

      The heinous Axe Murder crime on August 18 in 1976 at JSA (Joint Security Area) within DMZ (demilitarized zone) was the first murder committed by North Korea since the signing of Armistice Agreement in 1953. Whereas this incident was finalized by merely cutting the poplar tree, the U.S. is responding to the murder of its soldiers in Iran, Iraq, Somalia and elsewhere by swift and resolute retaliatory measures. From the perspective of the Civil-Military Relations (CMR), in the course of resolving the Axe Murder case, it appears that Henry Kissinger, then Secretary of State as well as the top diplomat, represented the civilian group in the absence of President Ford, while Richard G. Stilwell, the Commander of CINCUNC-CFC-USFK and active military officer, represented the military establishment during the time of Chief of Joint Chiefs of Staff’s absence. According to the conventional wisdom, within the context of CMR, the civilian elites are expected to play a role of suppressing the trigger-happy tendencies displayed by the military officers. Case in point would be the showdown between Prussia’s Otto von Bismarck and Helmut von Moltke. ‘Iron Chancellor’ Bismark tried his utmost in order to tamp down the zeal of the Prussian Army’s Chief of Staff, who demanded a victorious military parade through the downtown of Vienna right after the stunning victory at the Austro-Prussian War.
      The relation between Kissinger and Stilwell was totally opposite to that of Bismark-Moltke case. While Kissinger revealed that he was willing to take risks for retaliatory measures against North Koreans by showing hostilities toward them, Stilwell who was at the virtual end of more than four-decade of military career took pains to focus on myopic goal of cutting ‘the damn tree’ and on other damage control measures. Therefore, in one sense, whereas Kissinger played the role of military commander, Stilwell played the role of career diplomat. Prospect Theory provides us with an insightful clue as to the dramatic role-reversal between them.
      The purpose of this study is, by applying Prospect Theory, to enhance the understanding and explanatory power by means of examining the potential conflictual relations between the civil-military elites and other related issues revolving around ‘the use of force’ issue with the focus on the case study of Panmunjom Axe Murder Incident. Followed by the Introduction, the Chapter 2 will examine relevant basic concepts of Prospect Theory and explore mutually reinforcing relations between Prospect Theory and CMR. The Chapter 3 will take up the work of case study regarding the Axe Murder Incident in 1976. And finally the Chapter 4 will summarize main findings of the study and delve into the Prospect Theory’s limitations and other theoretical issues to be further refined.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 전망이론과 민군관계
      • Ⅲ. 1976년 판문점 도끼만행 사건
      • Ⅳ. 결론 및 함의
      • ABSTRACT
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 전망이론과 민군관계
      • Ⅲ. 1976년 판문점 도끼만행 사건
      • Ⅳ. 결론 및 함의
      • 〈참고문헌〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김예지, "제도적 행위이론을 통한 동북아지역 다자협력의 제도화 과정 분석" 25 : 275-318, 2016

      2 돈 오버도퍼, "두 개의 한국 : 전직 워싱턴포스트 기자와 미국 최고 남북한 전문가가 바라본 한국 현대사 비록" 길산 2014

      3 양낙규, "남북회담 판문점 개최 의미는"

      4 군사편찬연구소, "국방 사건사 제1집: 8.18 판문점 도끼만행사건 등" 군사편찬연구소 2012

      5 Powell, Colin, "US Forces: Challenges Ahead" 71 (71): 32-45, 1992

      6 Huntington, Samuel, "The Soldier and the State : The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations" Harvard University Press 1957

      7 Ross, Dennis, "Soviet Decisionmaking for National Security" Allen & Unwin 1984

      8 Krine, Douglas, "Reassessing American Casualty Sensitivity : The Mediating Influence of Inequality" 58 (58): 1174-1201, 2014

      9 Tversky, Amos, "Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions" 59 (59): S251-S278, 1986

      10 Rose McDermott, "Prospect Theory in International Relations : The Iranian Hostage Rescue Mission" 13 (13): 237-263, 1992

      1 김예지, "제도적 행위이론을 통한 동북아지역 다자협력의 제도화 과정 분석" 25 : 275-318, 2016

      2 돈 오버도퍼, "두 개의 한국 : 전직 워싱턴포스트 기자와 미국 최고 남북한 전문가가 바라본 한국 현대사 비록" 길산 2014

      3 양낙규, "남북회담 판문점 개최 의미는"

      4 군사편찬연구소, "국방 사건사 제1집: 8.18 판문점 도끼만행사건 등" 군사편찬연구소 2012

      5 Powell, Colin, "US Forces: Challenges Ahead" 71 (71): 32-45, 1992

      6 Huntington, Samuel, "The Soldier and the State : The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations" Harvard University Press 1957

      7 Ross, Dennis, "Soviet Decisionmaking for National Security" Allen & Unwin 1984

      8 Krine, Douglas, "Reassessing American Casualty Sensitivity : The Mediating Influence of Inequality" 58 (58): 1174-1201, 2014

      9 Tversky, Amos, "Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions" 59 (59): S251-S278, 1986

      10 Rose McDermott, "Prospect Theory in International Relations : The Iranian Hostage Rescue Mission" 13 (13): 237-263, 1992

      11 Jonathan Mercer, "Prospect Theory and Political Science" 8 (8): 2005

      12 Mercer, Jonathan, "Prospect Theory and Political Science" 8 : 1-21, 2005

      13 Winder, Gregory, "Prospect Theory and Civil-Conflict: The Case of 1976 Korean Axe Murder Incident" 43 (43): 734-757, 2017

      14 Kahneman, Daniel, "Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision Under Risk" 47 : 263-291, 1979

      15 Daniel Kahneman, "Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision Under Risk" 47 : 263-291, 1979

      16 Houghton, David P., "Political Psychology" Routledge 2015

      17 Barbara J. McNeil, "On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies" 306 : 1259-1262, 1982

      18 DeLateur, Conrad, "Murder at Panmunjon: The Role of the Theater Commander in Crisis Resolution" 1987

      19 Waltz, Kenneth, "Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis" Columbia University Press 1959

      20 Stilwell, Richard G., "In Korea, ‘Single-Minded Emphasis on Deterrence’" 26 : 68-72, 1976

      21 Levy, Yagil, "How Casualty Sensitivity Affects Civilian Control:The Israeli Experience" 12 (12): 68-88, 2011

      22 Kahneman, Daniel, "Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem" 98 (98): 1325-1348, 1990

      23 Yoshitaka Komiya, "Casualty sensitivity in Japan: Information underlying certainty and uncertainty" 국제지역연구센터 22 (22): 258-276, 2019

      24 Sechser, Todd S., "Are Soldiers Less War-Prone than Statesmen?" 48 (48): 746-774, 2004

      25 Levy, Jack S., "An Introduction to Prospect Theory" 13 (13): 171-186, 1992

      26 Keohane, Robert O., "After Hegemony" Princeton University 1984

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.11
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.13 0.278 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼