The Effects of Epidural Anesthesia in Elderly Patients during Single-Level Lumbar Microdiscectomy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: To analyze the effect of epidural anesthesia in elderly patients with single-level lumbar discectomy.
Methods: Medical records of 28 patients aged between 60 and 90 years who had undergone single-level lumbar microdiscectomy by two surgeons from January 2004 to December 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group I was comprised of patients with lumbar discectomy under epidural anesthesia and Group II was comprised of patients with lumbar discectomy under general anesthesia. Factors taken into account when comparing the effects of epidural and general anesthesia were surgical time, anesthetic time, starting time of ambulation after surgery, hospital stay, postoperative headache, nausea, vomiting, urinary difficulty, back pain and patient satisfaction. The score on the visual analogue scale(VAS) for back pain was measured after surgery.
Results: 15 patients(Group I) underwent discectomy under epidural anesthesia. The mean age of patients in Group I and II were 65±6.1 years and 67±6.7 years, respectively. 19 patients had underlying co-morbidities, such as cardiovascular, pulmonary, cerebrovascular diseases and cancer. Demographically, there was no statistical diffe- rence between the two groups. Surgical time, anesthetic time, starting time of ambulation after surgery and hospital stay were longer in patients in Group II. The incidences of urinary difficulty and VAS score for back pain were significantly lower in Group I. The incidences of headache, nausea and vomiting and patient satisfaction were not different between Group I and II.
Conclusion: Epidural anesthesia was as efficacious and as safe as general anesthesia. Elderly patients who need to undergo single-level lumbar discectomy could be offered epidural anesthesia.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: To analyze the effect of epidural anesthesia in elderly patients with single-level lumbar discectomy.
Methods: Medical records of 28 patients aged between 60 and 90 years who had undergone single-level lumbar microdiscectomy by two surgeons from January 2004 to December 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group I was comprised of patients with lumbar discectomy under epidural anesthesia and Group II was comprised of patients with lumbar discectomy under general anesthesia. Factors taken into account when comparing the effects of epidural and general anesthesia were surgical time, anesthetic time, starting time of ambulation after surgery, hospital stay, postoperative headache, nausea, vomiting, urinary difficulty, back pain and patient satisfaction. The score on the visual analogue scale(VAS) for back pain was measured after surgery.
Results: 15 patients(Group I) underwent discectomy under epidural anesthesia. The mean age of patients in Group I and II were 65±6.1 years and 67±6.7 years, respectively. 19 patients had underlying co-morbidities, such as cardiovascular, pulmonary, cerebrovascular diseases and cancer. Demographically, there was no statistical diffe- rence between the two groups. Surgical time, anesthetic time, starting time of ambulation after surgery and hospital stay were longer in patients in Group II. The incidences of urinary difficulty and VAS score for back pain were significantly lower in Group I. The incidences of headache, nausea and vomiting and patient satisfaction were not different between Group I and II.
Conclusion: Epidural anesthesia was as efficacious and as safe as general anesthesia. Elderly patients who need to undergo single-level lumbar discectomy could be offered epidural anesthesia.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Modig J., "Thromboembolism after total hip replacement: role of epidural and general anesthesia" 62 : 174-180, 1983

2 Wee SB., "Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease in geriatric patients over 70 years old: a review of two decades" 5 : 161-166, 2008

3 Papadopoulos EC., "Lumbar microdiscectomies under epidural anesthesia: a comparison study" 6 : 561-564, 2006

4 Giebler RM., "Incidence of neurologic complications related to thoracic epidural catheterization" 86 : 559-564, 1997

5 Tanaka K., "Extensive application of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in a university hospital: incidence of complications related to technique" 18 : 34-38, 1993

6 Matheson D., "Epidural anaesthesia for lumbar laminectomy and spinal fusion" 7 : 149-157, 1960

7 McLain RF., "Comparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a case-controlled analysis of 400 patients" 2 : 17-22, 2005

8 Fischer HBJ., "Acute pain relief - the role of regional anaesthesia" 6 : 87-91, 1995

9 Jellish WS., "A prospective randomized study comparing short- and intermediate-term perioperative outcome variables after spinal or general anesthesia for lumbar disk and laminectomy surgery" 83 : 559-564, 1996

10 Demirel CB., "A prospective randomized study comparing perioperative outcome variables after epidural or general anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery" 15 : 185-192, 2003