시공책임형 CM 발주방식 시범사업 성과분석을 통한 제도개선방안 도출 : 단지개발사업을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

CM at Risk is one of the public sector ordering methods. As the construction industry has recently become more complex and diversified, one of the most important factors is which ordering method to adopt for
the success of construction projects such as complex development projects.

The government has developed an intermediate stage ordering method that complements the problems of the design-construction batch bidding system (DBB) turnkey method and the design-construction separate
bidding system (DB), which are the main pillars of recent ordering methods. In 2016, CM at Risk which has many successful cases, was introduced to the public sector.

In addition, CM at Risk was introduced to the complex field in 2019, and the government announced plans to institutionalize CM at Risk (in 2018) and expand it (in 2022).

Therefore, this study analyzes the performance of 12 construction CM at Risk pilot projects introduced in the complex project field among the public sector from 2019 to analyze how the advantages presented by the
government at the beginning of the pilot project are operating, and based on this, As a result, we would like to propose 11 institutional improvements that require review before formal institutionalization.

Even if all of these 11 system improvements are not reflected, it is hoped that a new ordering method unique to Korea will be established as soon as possible through analysis based on these and better system improvement.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 1
• 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
• 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 1
• Ⅱ. 시공책임형 CM 이론적 고찰 2
• 1. 시공책임형 CM 정의 및 개념 2
• 2. 정부정책 추진방향 및 시범사업 가이드라인 4
• 3. 미국의 시공책임형 CM 제도분석 7
• 4. 단지분야 시공책임형 CM 추진현황 9
• Ⅲ. 시범사업 추진현황 분석 13
• 1. GMP와 원가공개방식 13
• 2. 시공노하우 반영 14
• 3. 공사기간 단축 16
• 4. 설계오류 및 설계변경 최소화 18
• 5. 설계오류에 대한 책임소재 19
• 6. VE 제안내용 분석 20
• 7. BIM 연계 활용방안 21
• Ⅳ. 제도개선방안 제안 22
• 1. 한국형 또는 단지형 OPEN BOOK 도입 22
• 2. 가격조정계수 탄력적용 23
• 3. Preconstruction 전문가 시공단계 참여 24
• 4. 설계도서 검토기간 보장 24
• 5. 최소 원가절감 목표제 도입 25
• 6. 신규과업 시공금액 협상방안 26
• 7. 설계 및 시공단계 VE 활성화 및 이익공유 26
• 8. 사후관리계약 사후평가 및 페널티 부여 27
• 9. 하도급 심사 시행으로 동반성장 실현 27
• 10. 동반성장 가점 부여 28
• 11. 복수 사업관리자 제도 도입 28
• Ⅴ. 결론 29
• 참고문헌 30