RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Optimal Forms of Noun Phrases in Korean = Optimal Forms of Noun Phrases in Korean

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60056468

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Languages show a different strategy to mark the crosslinguistically prevalent grammatical features of plurality and definiteness. English makes use of a plural morpheme and articles to mark these features while Mandarin Chinese adopts unmarked forms for them. No matter which strategy a language takes, nominal forms make consistent patterns. Basically, Korean adopts a marking strategy for the features. However, marking itself is not mandatory for most categories of nouns, and thus alternate forms occur in Korean. To account for proper nominal forms in Korean, I resort to the Optimality Theory of de Swart & Zwarts (2009, 2010). I argue that a markedness constraint and faithfulness constraints are co-ranked in Korean unlike other languages and that some of the faithfulness constraints are subcategorized and situated in different positions in the hierarchical ordering of optimality. Hence, more than one nominal form turns out to be equally optimal and are used alternately.
    번역하기

    Languages show a different strategy to mark the crosslinguistically prevalent grammatical features of plurality and definiteness. English makes use of a plural morpheme and articles to mark these features while Mandarin Chinese adopts unmarked forms f...

    Languages show a different strategy to mark the crosslinguistically prevalent grammatical features of plurality and definiteness. English makes use of a plural morpheme and articles to mark these features while Mandarin Chinese adopts unmarked forms for them. No matter which strategy a language takes, nominal forms make consistent patterns. Basically, Korean adopts a marking strategy for the features. However, marking itself is not mandatory for most categories of nouns, and thus alternate forms occur in Korean. To account for proper nominal forms in Korean, I resort to the Optimality Theory of de Swart & Zwarts (2009, 2010). I argue that a markedness constraint and faithfulness constraints are co-ranked in Korean unlike other languages and that some of the faithfulness constraints are subcategorized and situated in different positions in the hierarchical ordering of optimality. Hence, more than one nominal form turns out to be equally optimal and are used alternately.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼