RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    통계적 유의성을 고려하여 고객 요구속성의 중요도를 산정하는 방법 = A Method to Determine the Final Importance of Customer Attributes Considering Statistical Significance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104206501

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Obtaining the accurate final importance of each customer attribute (CA) is very important in the house of
    quality(HOQ), because it is deployed to the quality of the final product or service through the quality function
    deployment(QFD). The final importance is often calculated by the multiplication of the relative importance rate
    and the competitive priority rate. Traditionally, the sample mean is used for estimating two rates but the dispersion
    is ignored. This paper proposes a new approach that incorporates statistical significance to consider
    the dispersion of rates in determining the final importance of CA. The approach is illustrated with a design
    of car door for each case of crisp and fuzzy numbers.
    번역하기

    Obtaining the accurate final importance of each customer attribute (CA) is very important in the house of quality(HOQ), because it is deployed to the quality of the final product or service through the quality function deployment(QFD). The final impor...

    Obtaining the accurate final importance of each customer attribute (CA) is very important in the house of
    quality(HOQ), because it is deployed to the quality of the final product or service through the quality function
    deployment(QFD). The final importance is often calculated by the multiplication of the relative importance rate
    and the competitive priority rate. Traditionally, the sample mean is used for estimating two rates but the dispersion
    is ignored. This paper proposes a new approach that incorporates statistical significance to consider
    the dispersion of rates in determining the final importance of CA. The approach is illustrated with a design
    of car door for each case of crisp and fuzzy numbers.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Griffin, A., "The voice of the customer" 12 (12): 1-27, 1993

    2 Shen, X.X., "The implementation of quality function deployment based on linguistic data" 12 (12): 65-75, 2001

    3 Hauser, J.R., "The house of quality" Harvard Business Review 63-73, 1988

    4 Saaty, T.L., "The Analytical Hierarchy Process" McGraw-Hill 1980

    5 Runkler, T.A, "Selection of appropriate defuzzification methods using application specific properties" 5 (5): 72-79, 1997

    6 Chan, L.K., "Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy method" 37 (37): 2499-2518, 1999

    7 Chan, L., "Quality function deployment: a literature review" 143 : 463-497, 2002

    8 Cohen, L., "Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You" Addison Wesley Longman 1995

    9 Hsu, T., "QFD with fuzzy and entropy weight for evaluating retail customer values" 17 (17): 935-958, 2006

    10 Zadeh, L.A, "Fuzzy sets" 8 : 338-353, 1965

    1 Griffin, A., "The voice of the customer" 12 (12): 1-27, 1993

    2 Shen, X.X., "The implementation of quality function deployment based on linguistic data" 12 (12): 65-75, 2001

    3 Hauser, J.R., "The house of quality" Harvard Business Review 63-73, 1988

    4 Saaty, T.L., "The Analytical Hierarchy Process" McGraw-Hill 1980

    5 Runkler, T.A, "Selection of appropriate defuzzification methods using application specific properties" 5 (5): 72-79, 1997

    6 Chan, L.K., "Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy method" 37 (37): 2499-2518, 1999

    7 Chan, L., "Quality function deployment: a literature review" 143 : 463-497, 2002

    8 Cohen, L., "Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You" Addison Wesley Longman 1995

    9 Hsu, T., "QFD with fuzzy and entropy weight for evaluating retail customer values" 17 (17): 935-958, 2006

    10 Zadeh, L.A, "Fuzzy sets" 8 : 338-353, 1965

    11 Dubois,D., "Fuzzy Set and System: Theory and Applications" Academic Press 1980

    12 Khoo, L.P, "Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system" 34 (34): 299-311, 1996

    13 Lee, E.S., "Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events" 15 : 887-896, 1988

    14 Chan, L, "A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example" 33 : 119-139, 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-07-01 등재 등재후보로 하락(현장점검) (기타) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.88 0.88 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.93 1 0.751 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼