RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      MB 정부의 문화정책 평가와 박근혜 정부의 정책 과제

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101778519

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Another regime change is in progress. The previous governments policies are being evaluated while the current administration presents new policies. Most administrations analyze their predecessors policies rigorously and divide their outcomes into successes and failures, so as to develop and inherit the former and to improve the latter. MB administration broke such a conventional practice by abolishing most cultural policies implemented by Roh administration and declaring that it would draw up its own policies anew. In the same vein, MB administration chose a slogan of Selection and Concentration for its cultural policy, which resulted in a divide, or polarization, in cultural industry and fundamental art. The Arms Length Principle upheld throughout the peoples government and Roh administration to support the culture and art sector was completely overturned by MB administration. Such a move stemmed from not any philosophical ground toward cultural policy but some obsessive compulsions to eliminate all remaining vestiges of the previous regime.
      Still, it is questionable to what extent the agenda of state affairs adopted by MB administration made a substantial difference from its predecessor. A regime, which is not fitted with philosophical perspectives and policy-based visions, cannot but depend on the ideas put forth by bureaucratic society to proceed with its policies. In the end, despite the bombastic rhetoric, such a regime repeats the same old policies with different slogans.
      GH regimes cultural policy should avert the failures committed by MB administration. GH administration should not revert to the vicious practices of MB administration to divide the cultural world into the left and right wings for the purpose of facilitating the ideological duel so that its slogan of “An Era of Cultural Prosperity” will go beyond a glib slogan. Differently put, GH administration should employ cultural diversity and publicness as its central philosophy and develop a substantial and practical Cultural New Deal policy to reinvigorate fundamental art and cultural industry.
      번역하기

      Another regime change is in progress. The previous governments policies are being evaluated while the current administration presents new policies. Most administrations analyze their predecessors policies rigorously and divide their outcomes into succ...

      Another regime change is in progress. The previous governments policies are being evaluated while the current administration presents new policies. Most administrations analyze their predecessors policies rigorously and divide their outcomes into successes and failures, so as to develop and inherit the former and to improve the latter. MB administration broke such a conventional practice by abolishing most cultural policies implemented by Roh administration and declaring that it would draw up its own policies anew. In the same vein, MB administration chose a slogan of Selection and Concentration for its cultural policy, which resulted in a divide, or polarization, in cultural industry and fundamental art. The Arms Length Principle upheld throughout the peoples government and Roh administration to support the culture and art sector was completely overturned by MB administration. Such a move stemmed from not any philosophical ground toward cultural policy but some obsessive compulsions to eliminate all remaining vestiges of the previous regime.
      Still, it is questionable to what extent the agenda of state affairs adopted by MB administration made a substantial difference from its predecessor. A regime, which is not fitted with philosophical perspectives and policy-based visions, cannot but depend on the ideas put forth by bureaucratic society to proceed with its policies. In the end, despite the bombastic rhetoric, such a regime repeats the same old policies with different slogans.
      GH regimes cultural policy should avert the failures committed by MB administration. GH administration should not revert to the vicious practices of MB administration to divide the cultural world into the left and right wings for the purpose of facilitating the ideological duel so that its slogan of “An Era of Cultural Prosperity” will go beyond a glib slogan. Differently put, GH administration should employ cultural diversity and publicness as its central philosophy and develop a substantial and practical Cultural New Deal policy to reinvigorate fundamental art and cultural industry.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼