RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일제시기 조선금융조합연합회의 운영주체와 ‘금융조합주의’ = Members of the Federation of Joseon Financial Associations during the Japanese Occupation period, and the accentuating of 'financial associations'

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76538772

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The foundation of the Federation of Joseon Financial Associations symbolized that the systemic organization of cooperative associations that would serve the interest of the authorities in a colonized situation was eventually finalized. The most notable thing that we could spot from the process is the fact that factions of financial associations were the ones which continuously requested the foundation of a central body for the financial associations, to the Joseon Governor General office. They were the force behind the operations of the federation. Most of the members were graduates from the Eastern League schools, who settled down in Joseon when they started to serve as directors of financial associations, before either (Korea's) colonization or during the 1910s. They were the people who pursued their interest within the terms of aboriginality and individuality, stuck between the Joseon Governor General office's officials and the Joseon people.
      The accentuating of 'financial associations' was rather an expression of a particular ideology, by the financial association-factions in their putting an emphasis upon their own aboriginality and individuality. In this ideological aspiration, they made a comparison between the financial associations in Joseon and the Japanese industrial associations, and argued the differences between the situation inside the colony and inside the mainland. They also emphasized certain differentials that existed between nations (countries, peoples), while also commenting upon the low level of awareness on the Joseon people's part and then linking it to the (supposed necessity of) monitoring and intervention of the authorities. They argued the necessity of a financial association, while suggesting its nature as a cooperative union, and that was where they were different from the Joseon Governor General office's officials, who argued a form of financial association as a special financial entity that should and could operate in a colonized environment. They claimed their individuality in the context of Joseon's particular condition of being colonized and being different from the mainland, and they claimed it also in the context of their themselves being unique within the hierarchy structure inside colonized Joseon, being different from not only the authorities but also the ordinary Joseon people.
      번역하기

      The foundation of the Federation of Joseon Financial Associations symbolized that the systemic organization of cooperative associations that would serve the interest of the authorities in a colonized situation was eventually finalized. The most notabl...

      The foundation of the Federation of Joseon Financial Associations symbolized that the systemic organization of cooperative associations that would serve the interest of the authorities in a colonized situation was eventually finalized. The most notable thing that we could spot from the process is the fact that factions of financial associations were the ones which continuously requested the foundation of a central body for the financial associations, to the Joseon Governor General office. They were the force behind the operations of the federation. Most of the members were graduates from the Eastern League schools, who settled down in Joseon when they started to serve as directors of financial associations, before either (Korea's) colonization or during the 1910s. They were the people who pursued their interest within the terms of aboriginality and individuality, stuck between the Joseon Governor General office's officials and the Joseon people.
      The accentuating of 'financial associations' was rather an expression of a particular ideology, by the financial association-factions in their putting an emphasis upon their own aboriginality and individuality. In this ideological aspiration, they made a comparison between the financial associations in Joseon and the Japanese industrial associations, and argued the differences between the situation inside the colony and inside the mainland. They also emphasized certain differentials that existed between nations (countries, peoples), while also commenting upon the low level of awareness on the Joseon people's part and then linking it to the (supposed necessity of) monitoring and intervention of the authorities. They argued the necessity of a financial association, while suggesting its nature as a cooperative union, and that was where they were different from the Joseon Governor General office's officials, who argued a form of financial association as a special financial entity that should and could operate in a colonized environment. They claimed their individuality in the context of Joseon's particular condition of being colonized and being different from the mainland, and they claimed it also in the context of their themselves being unique within the hierarchy structure inside colonized Joseon, being different from not only the authorities but also the ordinary Joseon people.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 식민지 관제협동조합 체계의 완성
      • Ⅲ. 연합회 운영주체의 식민지적 토착성과 독자성
      • Ⅳ. 조선 특수성론과 ‘금융조합주의’
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 식민지 관제협동조합 체계의 완성
      • Ⅲ. 연합회 운영주체의 식민지적 토착성과 독자성
      • Ⅳ. 조선 특수성론과 ‘금융조합주의’
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • 《자료》연합회 회장ㆍ임원 이력
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 車田篤, "理事中心主義論" (5) : 12-13, 1929

      2 이경란, "일제하 금융조합 연구" 혜안 2002

      3 문영주, "일제말기(1937~15) 금융조합 농업대출금의 운용실태와 성격" (6) : 2001

      4 최재성, "식민지 조선의 사회 경제와 금융조합" 경인문화사 2006

      5 문영주, "금융조합 조선인 이사의 사회적 위상과 존재양태" 한국역사연구회 (63) : 137-162, 2007

      6 農業協同組合中央會, "韓國農業金融史" 1963

      7 山根譓, "金融組合理事中心主義の反省" (48) : 18-, 1932

      8 牟田利彦, "金融組合運動" 朝鮮金融組合協會 229-, 1932

      9 山根譓, "金融組合槪論(개정6판)" 谷岡商店 103-, 1937

      10 牟田利彦, "金融組合實務" (3) : 25-, 1929

      1 車田篤, "理事中心主義論" (5) : 12-13, 1929

      2 이경란, "일제하 금융조합 연구" 혜안 2002

      3 문영주, "일제말기(1937~15) 금융조합 농업대출금의 운용실태와 성격" (6) : 2001

      4 최재성, "식민지 조선의 사회 경제와 금융조합" 경인문화사 2006

      5 문영주, "금융조합 조선인 이사의 사회적 위상과 존재양태" 한국역사연구회 (63) : 137-162, 2007

      6 農業協同組合中央會, "韓國農業金融史" 1963

      7 山根譓, "金融組合理事中心主義の反省" (48) : 18-, 1932

      8 牟田利彦, "金融組合運動" 朝鮮金融組合協會 229-, 1932

      9 山根譓, "金融組合槪論(개정6판)" 谷岡商店 103-, 1937

      10 牟田利彦, "金融組合實務" (3) : 25-, 1929

      11 矢鍋永三郞, "金融組合制度に對する一考察" 朝鮮金融組合協會 213-217, 1931

      12 林繁藏, "金融組合の統制機關設立に就て" (220) : 79-80, 1933

      13 財務局長談, "金融組合の統制機關設立に就て" (60) : 204-, 1933

      14 牟田利彦, "金融組合とその精神" 朝鮮金融組合協會 183-184, 1930

      15 高橋龜吉, "現代朝鮮經濟論" 千倉書房 539-, 1935

      16 "東亞日報"

      17 朝鮮金融組合聯合會, "朝鮮金融組合聯合會十年史" 49-, 1944

      18 文定昌, "朝鮮農村團體史" 日本評論社 234-, 1942

      19 鈴木正文, "朝鮮經濟の現段階" 帝國地方行政學會朝鮮本部 340-, 1939

      20 鈴木穆, "朝鮮殖産銀行の設立の要旨" (9월) : 8-, 1918

      21 山根譓, "朝鮮協同組合讀本" 朝鮮金融組合聯合會 12-13, 1937

      22 山根譓, "朝鮮の協同組合の進むべき道" (131) : 3-4, 1939

      23 鈴木直八, "昔の思出" (84) : 27-, 1935

      24 H․K生, "我輩は朝鮮産業の開發者にして國民思想の先導者なり" (34) : 46-, 1922

      25 鈴木穆, "地方金融組合令の改正に就て" 17-18, 1918

      26 關田源太郞, "友邦韓國の金融組合及び關聯機關奉仕三十年の思い出 in: 朝鮮金融組合回顧錄" 友邦協會 48-, 1984

      27 山根譓, "事變下に立つ金融組合の任務" (133) : 3-, 1939

      28 牟田利彦, "ラ式組合と朝鮮の金融組合" 鮮金融組合協會 240-242, 1930

      29 문영주, "1920년대 금융조합 중앙기관 설립 논의와 1933년 조선금융조합연합회의 설립" 수선사학회 (16) : 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (재인증)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.15 1.15 1.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.21 1.16 2.615 0.53
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼