RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    『바가바드기타』 제12장의 난문(難文)에 대한 이해 -9~12송을 중심으로- = An Understanding of Difficult Verse in the Chapter 12 in Bhagavadgita: Focusing on the Verses 9~12

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60205328

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    『바가바드기타』 제12장은 믿음의 길을 그 주제로 하고 있다. 그러나 9~12송에는 믿음의 길을 말하면서 수습(修習), 지혜, 선정, 행위의 결과의 포기, 마음의 평화 등을 함께 말하고 있다. 그러한 행법 내지는 경지들을 서로 비교평가하고 있다. 이에는 근기에 대한 고려가 놓여 있는데, 근기에 따라서 가장 어려운 행법에서부터 가장 쉬운 행법으로 가르침이 설해진다. 또 그러한 행법을 우열의 맥락에서 비교평가하기도 한다. 그로 말미암아서 이해하기 매우 어려운 부분이 등장하게 된다. 이 글은 바로 그러한 난문들을 이해해 보려는 시도이다. 샹카라와 라마누자의 주석에 의지하면서, 주요개념인 abhyasa-yoga, mad-yoga, 그리고 mat-karma 등의 의미를 새롭게 확정함으로써 9~11송의 이해를 새롭게 하였다. 그런 기반 위에서 9~11송은 근기의 상하를 기준으로 하여서 돈점(頓漸)으로 행법이 나누어져서 설해져 있으며, 12송은 행법의 우열을 기준으로 설해진 것임을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 결론은 종래 우리가 흔히 가졌던 "믿음의 길은 낮은 근기의 사람들을 위해서 설해진 이행도이므로 가장 낮은 행법"이라는 편견을 깨뜨리게 한다. 낮은 근기의 사람들을 위해서 설해진 이행도이지만, 그 행법의 우열에서 볼 때에는 가장 높은 수준의 행법일 수 있음을 배울 수 있게 된 것이다.
    번역하기

    『바가바드기타』 제12장은 믿음의 길을 그 주제로 하고 있다. 그러나 9~12송에는 믿음의 길을 말하면서 수습(修習), 지혜, 선정, 행위의 결과의 포기, 마음의 평화 등을 함께 말하고 있다. 그...

    『바가바드기타』 제12장은 믿음의 길을 그 주제로 하고 있다. 그러나 9~12송에는 믿음의 길을 말하면서 수습(修習), 지혜, 선정, 행위의 결과의 포기, 마음의 평화 등을 함께 말하고 있다. 그러한 행법 내지는 경지들을 서로 비교평가하고 있다. 이에는 근기에 대한 고려가 놓여 있는데, 근기에 따라서 가장 어려운 행법에서부터 가장 쉬운 행법으로 가르침이 설해진다. 또 그러한 행법을 우열의 맥락에서 비교평가하기도 한다. 그로 말미암아서 이해하기 매우 어려운 부분이 등장하게 된다. 이 글은 바로 그러한 난문들을 이해해 보려는 시도이다. 샹카라와 라마누자의 주석에 의지하면서, 주요개념인 abhyasa-yoga, mad-yoga, 그리고 mat-karma 등의 의미를 새롭게 확정함으로써 9~11송의 이해를 새롭게 하였다. 그런 기반 위에서 9~11송은 근기의 상하를 기준으로 하여서 돈점(頓漸)으로 행법이 나누어져서 설해져 있으며, 12송은 행법의 우열을 기준으로 설해진 것임을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 결론은 종래 우리가 흔히 가졌던 "믿음의 길은 낮은 근기의 사람들을 위해서 설해진 이행도이므로 가장 낮은 행법"이라는 편견을 깨뜨리게 한다. 낮은 근기의 사람들을 위해서 설해진 이행도이지만, 그 행법의 우열에서 볼 때에는 가장 높은 수준의 행법일 수 있음을 배울 수 있게 된 것이다.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The theme of the 12th chapter of Bhagavadgita is bhakti-yoga. While it is a short chapter which includes only 20 verses, it is not easy to understand. In particular, grasping the verse 9~12 is the key to understand chapter 12. This paper overview how to understand the verse 9~12 which are difficult to understand. There are two difficult points in the verse 9~12, so I will discuss each points in the verse 9~11 and the verse 12. It is a better way to directly go to bhakti-yoga at first as the verse 6~8 say, but the verse 9~11 show the alternative ways to practice in case the former way is impossible. Understanding that karma-yoga appears when bhakti-yoga is impossible, I face the difficulty that the verse 12 says, "taking refuge in My disciplined activity renounce the fruit of all acting." This means that the verse 12 suggests to practice bhakti-yoga and then to practice karma-yoga based on bhakti-yoga. When I follow this interpretation, however, I face the incoherence that bhakti-yoga told in the verse 5-8 appears again in the verse 9~11 which suggest the alternative to bhakti-yoga. To solve this incoherence, I reconsider the crucial conceptions: abhyasa-yoga, mad-yoga and mat-karma. As a result, I see that abhyasa-yoga is the halfway point to bhakti-yoga and means the repetition of the recollection of god. However, it is the misunderstanding that mad-yoga in the verse 11 is related to bhakti-yoga, although it is told in the context of the chapter 12 that explains bhakti-yoga. Both Sankara and Ramanuja understand mad-yoga as a way of karma-yoga. In particular, Ramanuja accept karma-yoga as upaya to proceed to bhakti-yoga. In addition, when I accept Ramanuja`s interpretation that mat-karma in the verse 10 also serves God, the verse 9~10 are categorized as bhakti-yoga, although there is difference in difficulty. Moreover, the verse 11 is karma-yoga for the people who have lower adhikara. The second matter is about the difficult verses. There are two difficulties in the verse 12. One is whether meditation is more distinguished than wisdom in a certain sense; Buddhism never states that meditation is more distinguished than wisdom. The other is whether santi which the verse 12 says the greatest way to practice is told in the context of bhakti-yoga; this can be told in jnana-yoga. To solve these two problems, I examine the perspectives of Sankara and Ramanuja. Sankara understands abhyasa and meditation with wisdom. This means that abhyasa without wisdom is inferior to wisdom and meditation with wisdom is superior to the mere wisdom. However, Sankara makes commentary that the verse 12``s viewpoint that karma-yoga is more outstanding than jnana-yoga is true for the ignorant people, because that is against for his own philosophy which focuses on jnana-yoga. I judge that this falls into adhikaravada. On the other hand, in my opinion, Ramanuja understands meditation as the occurrence of upaya. That is more distinguished than the meditation on the Imperishable Unmanifested. In other words, he regards meditation as bhakti-yoga, not as jnana-yoga. Ramanuja also considers santi as bhakti-yoga. Santi is more highly positioned than karma-yoga and jnana-yoga, because it is related to para bhakti on the Supreme Being. As I mentioned above, a new understanding on the verses 9~12 brings two pieces of knowledge. One is that bhakti-yoga which becomes together with God is suited to ones who have the highest adhikara, not to the lowest adhikara. Hence, bhakti-yoga is the most difficult way, not the easiest way. The other is that the context of the verses 9~11 is different from that of the verse 12. The verses 9~11 develop "from high adhikara to low adhikara," based on the levels of adhikara, but the verse 12 is based on the superiority of the way to practice. At this point, I can overcome the prepossession which Sankara and Zen/Son Buddhism states. That is the prepossession that the way for the people who have the lowest adhikara is the most inferior way. "The resignation from the result of act" suggested for the people who have the lowest adhikara in the verse 11 is not as proper way as bhakti-yoga, but it can be the second best according to the verse 12. The most excellent lesson is of newly understanding the verses 9~12 of the chapter 12 of Bhagavadgita in the context of Hinduism is that I can revaluate Pure land Buddhism and faith of the Other Power which belongs to the same paradigm. It is impossible to justify Zen/Son Buddhism`s judgement that "the way for low adhikara is inferior, because it is the easy way." In the viewpoint of Pure land Buddhism, that will be the most distinguished way(in the verse 12), although it is the easiest way for the people have low adhikara. This lesson is one of the pleasures and rewards to study Indian Philosophy and Buddhism together.
    번역하기

    The theme of the 12th chapter of Bhagavadgita is bhakti-yoga. While it is a short chapter which includes only 20 verses, it is not easy to understand. In particular, grasping the verse 9~12 is the key to understand chapter 12. This paper overview how ...

    The theme of the 12th chapter of Bhagavadgita is bhakti-yoga. While it is a short chapter which includes only 20 verses, it is not easy to understand. In particular, grasping the verse 9~12 is the key to understand chapter 12. This paper overview how to understand the verse 9~12 which are difficult to understand. There are two difficult points in the verse 9~12, so I will discuss each points in the verse 9~11 and the verse 12. It is a better way to directly go to bhakti-yoga at first as the verse 6~8 say, but the verse 9~11 show the alternative ways to practice in case the former way is impossible. Understanding that karma-yoga appears when bhakti-yoga is impossible, I face the difficulty that the verse 12 says, "taking refuge in My disciplined activity renounce the fruit of all acting." This means that the verse 12 suggests to practice bhakti-yoga and then to practice karma-yoga based on bhakti-yoga. When I follow this interpretation, however, I face the incoherence that bhakti-yoga told in the verse 5-8 appears again in the verse 9~11 which suggest the alternative to bhakti-yoga. To solve this incoherence, I reconsider the crucial conceptions: abhyasa-yoga, mad-yoga and mat-karma. As a result, I see that abhyasa-yoga is the halfway point to bhakti-yoga and means the repetition of the recollection of god. However, it is the misunderstanding that mad-yoga in the verse 11 is related to bhakti-yoga, although it is told in the context of the chapter 12 that explains bhakti-yoga. Both Sankara and Ramanuja understand mad-yoga as a way of karma-yoga. In particular, Ramanuja accept karma-yoga as upaya to proceed to bhakti-yoga. In addition, when I accept Ramanuja`s interpretation that mat-karma in the verse 10 also serves God, the verse 9~10 are categorized as bhakti-yoga, although there is difference in difficulty. Moreover, the verse 11 is karma-yoga for the people who have lower adhikara. The second matter is about the difficult verses. There are two difficulties in the verse 12. One is whether meditation is more distinguished than wisdom in a certain sense; Buddhism never states that meditation is more distinguished than wisdom. The other is whether santi which the verse 12 says the greatest way to practice is told in the context of bhakti-yoga; this can be told in jnana-yoga. To solve these two problems, I examine the perspectives of Sankara and Ramanuja. Sankara understands abhyasa and meditation with wisdom. This means that abhyasa without wisdom is inferior to wisdom and meditation with wisdom is superior to the mere wisdom. However, Sankara makes commentary that the verse 12``s viewpoint that karma-yoga is more outstanding than jnana-yoga is true for the ignorant people, because that is against for his own philosophy which focuses on jnana-yoga. I judge that this falls into adhikaravada. On the other hand, in my opinion, Ramanuja understands meditation as the occurrence of upaya. That is more distinguished than the meditation on the Imperishable Unmanifested. In other words, he regards meditation as bhakti-yoga, not as jnana-yoga. Ramanuja also considers santi as bhakti-yoga. Santi is more highly positioned than karma-yoga and jnana-yoga, because it is related to para bhakti on the Supreme Being. As I mentioned above, a new understanding on the verses 9~12 brings two pieces of knowledge. One is that bhakti-yoga which becomes together with God is suited to ones who have the highest adhikara, not to the lowest adhikara. Hence, bhakti-yoga is the most difficult way, not the easiest way. The other is that the context of the verses 9~11 is different from that of the verse 12. The verses 9~11 develop "from high adhikara to low adhikara," based on the levels of adhikara, but the verse 12 is based on the superiority of the way to practice. At this point, I can overcome the prepossession which Sankara and Zen/Son Buddhism states. That is the prepossession that the way for the people who have the lowest adhikara is the most inferior way. "The resignation from the result of act" suggested for the people who have the lowest adhikara in the verse 11 is not as proper way as bhakti-yoga, but it can be the second best according to the verse 12. The most excellent lesson is of newly understanding the verses 9~12 of the chapter 12 of Bhagavadgita in the context of Hinduism is that I can revaluate Pure land Buddhism and faith of the Other Power which belongs to the same paradigm. It is impossible to justify Zen/Son Buddhism`s judgement that "the way for low adhikara is inferior, because it is the easy way." In the viewpoint of Pure land Buddhism, that will be the most distinguished way(in the verse 12), although it is the easiest way for the people have low adhikara. This lesson is one of the pleasures and rewards to study Indian Philosophy and Buddhism together.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Chartterjee, S. C., "학파로 보는인도사상" 예문서원 1999

    2 김호성, "초기 우파니샤드의 명상 개념 Ⅰ" 인도철학회 (7) : 1998

    3 Puligandla, R., "인도철학" 민족사 1993

    4 김호성, "이샤 우파니샤드에 대한 샹카라와 오로빈도의 해석 비교" (10) : 2001

    5 정승석, "요가수트라 주석" 소명출판 2010

    6 김호성, "불교해석학" 민족사 2009

    7 김호성, "바가바드기타와 관련해서 본 漢岩의 念佛參禪無二論" 월정사 (1) : 2006

    8 김호성, "바가바드기타 에 보이는 믿음과 행위의 관련성" 인도연구소 13 (13): 73-100, 2007

    9 柳宗悅, "南無阿彌陀佛" 岩波書店 2006

    10 김호성, "二入四行論의 인도철학적 이해" 한국요가학회 (6) : 2011

    1 Chartterjee, S. C., "학파로 보는인도사상" 예문서원 1999

    2 김호성, "초기 우파니샤드의 명상 개념 Ⅰ" 인도철학회 (7) : 1998

    3 Puligandla, R., "인도철학" 민족사 1993

    4 김호성, "이샤 우파니샤드에 대한 샹카라와 오로빈도의 해석 비교" (10) : 2001

    5 정승석, "요가수트라 주석" 소명출판 2010

    6 김호성, "불교해석학" 민족사 2009

    7 김호성, "바가바드기타와 관련해서 본 漢岩의 念佛參禪無二論" 월정사 (1) : 2006

    8 김호성, "바가바드기타 에 보이는 믿음과 행위의 관련성" 인도연구소 13 (13): 73-100, 2007

    9 柳宗悅, "南無阿彌陀佛" 岩波書店 2006

    10 김호성, "二入四行論의 인도철학적 이해" 한국요가학회 (6) : 2011

    11 Ādidevānanda, Svāmī, "Śrī Rāmānuja Gītā Bhāṣya" SriRamakrishna Math

    12 Radhakrishnan, S., "The Philosophy of Spiritual Life" George Allen& Unwin Ltd 1960

    13 Radhakrishnan, S., "The Bhagavadgītā" George Allen & Unwin Ltd 1976

    14 Rau, S. Subba, "The Bhagavad Gita Translationa andCommentaries in English According to SriMadhwācarya’s Bhāshyas" Madras 1906

    15 Warrier, A., "Srīmad Bhagavadgītā Bhāṣya of SriSaṁkarācārya" Madras 1982

    16 Minor, Robert N., "Bhagavadgītā, An Exegetical Commentary" Heritage Publishers 1982

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-04-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of Indian Philosophy -> Korean Journal of Indian Philosophy KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2018-10-11 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Society for Indian Philosophy KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.38 0.38 0.42
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.39 0.4 1.24 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼