철도선진국들은 도로혼잡과 환경문제 그리고 감소하는 철도 수송량 등의 문제를 해결하기 위한 철도정책을 추진하고 있다. 철도구조 개혁은 그 중의 하나인데 철도민영화는 주된 방식의 하...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101990864
2010
English
KCI등재
학술저널
1-28(28쪽)
3
0
상세조회0
다운로드철도선진국들은 도로혼잡과 환경문제 그리고 감소하는 철도 수송량 등의 문제를 해결하기 위한 철도정책을 추진하고 있다. 철도구조 개혁은 그 중의 하나인데 철도민영화는 주된 방식의 하...
철도선진국들은 도로혼잡과 환경문제 그리고 감소하는 철도 수송량 등의 문제를 해결하기 위한 철도정책을 추진하고 있다. 철도구조 개혁은 그 중의 하나인데 철도민영화는 주된 방식의 하나가 되고 있다. 역사적으로 일본은 1987년에 민영화를 추진하면서 지역별로 6개의 여객회사와 1개의 화물회사로 나누고 운영과 시설을 하나의 회사가 소유하고 운영하는 이른바 상하일체형의 민영화를 추진하였다. 그간 민영화의 성과도 있었지만 몇몇 학자들은 2005년 4월27일의 후쿠 지야마 철도사고가 민영화를 통해 철도회사가 과도하게 영리를 추구한 결과라고 분석하고 있다. 최근 일본에서는 그간의 상하일체형의 민영화방식과는 다른 상하분리형의 철도민영화가 추진되고 있다. 이러한 방식은 영국에서 이미 추진된 방식이다. 본 연구에서는 민영화 이후 최근까지 일본철도민영화의 성과를 살펴보 았는데 공과를 판단하기 위해 기능별로 철도부문의 민영화를 추진한 영국과의 비교를 검토해 보았다. 이러한 분석은 향후 우리나라 철도의 구조개혁에도 많은 시사점을 줄 것으로 판단된다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Most countries have been adopting policies that aim to deal with the problems of road congestion, environmental problems and the decreasing volume of rail. One vitally important subject is the reform of railways. In actual, the reform of railways has ...
Most countries have been adopting policies that aim to deal with the problems of road congestion, environmental problems and the decreasing volume of rail. One vitally important subject is the reform of railways. In actual, the reform of railways has been carried out in various ways and the most epoch-making policy has been the privatization of railways. In history, Japan made the first step when it carried out regional privatization, unifying the infrastructure and operation. It created 6 passenger enterprises and 1 freightenterprise. Some scholars insist that the accident, which occurred on 27th April 2005 at Hukujiyama in Japan, was also attributable to the emphasis on profitable management. Lately, Japanese policy has had a tendency to adopt the separation of infrastructure operations on some lines, whereas the UK policy has shifted to emphasize the greater role of government and infrastructure and operation tend to have a close relationship. This paper examines the process and outcomes of rail privatization of Japan, especially focusing on different methods of privatization. This paper may provide some lessons for future rail policies in Korea.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "www.christianwolmar.co.uk/articles/rail/470.shtml"
2 Wolmar,. C., "Unlike the UK ,the sun is rising on Japan's privatisation" 470 : 2003
3 Department for Transport, "Transport Statistics Great Britain, 2008 Edition" 2008
4 Department for Transport, "Transport Statistics Great Britain, 2004 Edition" 16-, 2004
5 Department for Transport, "Transport Statistics Great Britain, 1993 Edition" 53-, 1993
6 Department for Transport, "Transport Statistics Great Britain, 1991 Edition" 3-, 1991
7 James, A. Dunn. Jr., "Toward a New Model Railway for 21st Century: lessons for Five Countries" 55 (55): 43-57, 2001
8 Mathieu,G., "The reform of UK railway-privatization and its results" 34 : 16-31, 2003
9 Department for Transport, "The White Paper on the Future of Rail" 2004
10 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "The White Paper of Transport" 2005
1 "www.christianwolmar.co.uk/articles/rail/470.shtml"
2 Wolmar,. C., "Unlike the UK ,the sun is rising on Japan's privatisation" 470 : 2003
3 Department for Transport, "Transport Statistics Great Britain, 2008 Edition" 2008
4 Department for Transport, "Transport Statistics Great Britain, 2004 Edition" 16-, 2004
5 Department for Transport, "Transport Statistics Great Britain, 1993 Edition" 53-, 1993
6 Department for Transport, "Transport Statistics Great Britain, 1991 Edition" 3-, 1991
7 James, A. Dunn. Jr., "Toward a New Model Railway for 21st Century: lessons for Five Countries" 55 (55): 43-57, 2001
8 Mathieu,G., "The reform of UK railway-privatization and its results" 34 : 16-31, 2003
9 Department for Transport, "The White Paper on the Future of Rail" 2004
10 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "The White Paper of Transport" 2005
11 "The Times, 17 July 2006"
12 Ministry of Transport, "The Railways Annual Statistics"
13 Supervisor Committee for the JNR Reconstruction, "The Opinion concerning JNR"
14 James, G. March, "The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factor in Political Life" 77 : 1984
15 Kakumoto,R., "The Inspection of JNR Reform" Hakuchoshobo 1989
16 Foster, C., "The Economics of Rail Privatisation" CRI 1994
17 Yamoto, T., "The Economics of JNR Reform" Seibunto 2001
18 Velde, D.M., "Railway reform and entrepreneurship: A tale of three countries" 871 : 10-11, 1998
19 MIT and Cambridge University, "Problems of De-regulation - The case of UK Railways"
20 Lettency, R.A., "Passenger rail privatization: A lesson from Japan. The Newspaper for and about the U.S. Congress"
21 Bradshaw.B., "New Direction for Britain's Railways British Railways Privatisation" McGraw-Hill Company 229-241, 2000
22 Obermauer, A., "National Railway Reform in Japan and EU: Evaluation of Institutional Changes" 29 : 30-, 2001
23 SRA, "National Rail Trends"
24 SRA, "National Rail Trend"
25 HSC, "Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry Part 2 Report: Progress Report to March 2002" 2002
26 HSC, "Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry Part 1Report : HSC Action Plan-Progress Report December 2001" 2001
27 Kusano, A., "JNR reform" Chukoshinsho 1989
28 Bradshaw.B., "Integrated Transport Policy" Ashgate 125-130, 2000
29 Nash,C.A., "Integrated Future and Transport Choices" Ashgate 252-257, 2003
30 HSE, "Hatfield derailment investigation - Interim recommendations of the Investigation Board"
31 Smith, A.S.J., "Essay on Rail Regulation: Analysis of the British Privatisation Experience" University of Cambridge 2004
32 Preston, J.M., "Development of Market Models for Increased Competition in Railroad Passenger Traffic" University of Oxford TSU 102-, 2001
33 SRA, "Customer Satisfaction Survey" 2004
34 Preston , J.M., "Changing Trains" Ashgate 71-74, 1999
35 Wolmar, C., "Broken Rail" AURUM PRESS 180-201, 2001
36 Gourvish, T., "British Rail , 1974−97" Oxford University Press 515-, 2002
37 Hall, S., "Beyond Hidden Dangers" Ian Allen 120-, 2003
38 OPRAF, "Annual Report" 1997
인구 고령화에 따른 사회복지지출에 관한 한·일간 비교분석
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2019-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2016-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2015-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보로 하락 (기타) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.64 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.984 | 0.1 |