RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SSCI SCOPUS

      Simultaneous Comparison of Efficacy and Tolerability of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Mixed-Treatment Comparison Analysis Based on Head-to-Head Trial Data

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101615702

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      ObjectiveaaSecond-generation antipsychotics have been repeatedly shown to be superior to placebo. However, the comparative efficacy among these drugs has not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we used Mixed Treatment Comparison (MTC) proced...

      ObjectiveaaSecond-generation antipsychotics have been repeatedly shown to be superior to placebo. However, the comparative efficacy among these drugs has not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we used Mixed Treatment Comparison (MTC) procedures to elucidate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of second-generation antipsychotics.
      MethodsaaSeven antipsychotics were selected based on the availability of the relevant data. Data were gathered from a series of review article published by the Cochrane Collaboration. Six outcome measures were analyzed: 1) percentage of no clinically important response as defined by the original authors, 2) PANSS total score change from baseline to endpoint, 3) percentage of akathisia, 4) percentage of antiparkinson medication use, 5) percentage of total body weight increase more than 7%, and 6) percentage of drop-out due to any reasons.
      ResultsaaAll the second-generation antipsychotics included in this study showed fairly similar efficacy but widely different tolerability. In terms of efficacy, amisulpride, clozapine and olanzapine were ranked higher than aripiprazole, quetiapine and ziprasidone. Clozapine and olanzapine were superior in terms of akathisia and extrapyramidal symptom risk, but, far more prone to induce clinically important weight gain.
      ConclusionaaUsing MTC methodology, we could line up the second generation antipsychotics according to their hierarchical superiority in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Though the wide overlap among the confidence intervals and the inconsistency between the direct and indirect comparison results may limit the validity of these results, it may still allow the important insights into the relative merits of the available drugs.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Subramanian S, "Zotepine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006628-, 2010

      2 Komossa K, "Zotepine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006628-, 2010

      3 Komossa K, "Ziprasidone versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006627-, 2009

      4 Lunn DJ, "WinBUGS-a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility" 10 : 325-337, 2000

      5 Kemp AS, "What is causing the reduced drug-placebo difference in recent schizophrenia clinical trials and what can be done about it?" 36 : 504-509, 2010

      6 Cipriani A, "What is a multiple treatments meta-analysis?" 21 : 151-153, 2012

      7 Bucher HC, "The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" 50 : 683-691, 1997

      8 Fava M, "The problem of the placebo response in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders: culprits, possible remedies, and a novel study design approach" 72 : 115-127, 2003

      9 Mills EJ, "The effects of excluding treatments from network meta-analyses: survey" 347 : f5195-, 2013

      10 Komossa K, "Sertindole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006752-, 2009

      1 Subramanian S, "Zotepine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006628-, 2010

      2 Komossa K, "Zotepine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006628-, 2010

      3 Komossa K, "Ziprasidone versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006627-, 2009

      4 Lunn DJ, "WinBUGS-a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility" 10 : 325-337, 2000

      5 Kemp AS, "What is causing the reduced drug-placebo difference in recent schizophrenia clinical trials and what can be done about it?" 36 : 504-509, 2010

      6 Cipriani A, "What is a multiple treatments meta-analysis?" 21 : 151-153, 2012

      7 Bucher HC, "The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" 50 : 683-691, 1997

      8 Fava M, "The problem of the placebo response in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders: culprits, possible remedies, and a novel study design approach" 72 : 115-127, 2003

      9 Mills EJ, "The effects of excluding treatments from network meta-analyses: survey" 347 : f5195-, 2013

      10 Komossa K, "Sertindole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006752-, 2009

      11 Komossa K, "Risperidone versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006626-, 2011

      12 Komossa K, "Quetiapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006625-, 2010

      13 Alphs L, "Placebo-related effects in clinical trials in schizophrenia: what is driving this phenomenon and what can be done to minimize it?" 15 : 1003-1014, 2012

      14 Komossa K, "Olanzapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006654-, 2010

      15 Scarff JR, "Newer oral atypical antipsychotic agents: a review" 36 : 832-838, 2011

      16 Enck P, "New insights into the placebo and nocebo responses" 59 : 195-206, 2008

      17 Lumley T, "Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons" 21 : 2313-2324, 2002

      18 Assiri A, "Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of aspirin, warfarin, and new anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation" 35 : 967-984, 2013

      19 Caldwell DM, "Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency" 63 : 875-882, 2010

      20 Sobieraj DM, "Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review" 3 : 2013

      21 Jansen JP, "Meta-regression models to address heterogeneity and inconsistency in network meta-analysis of survival outcomes" 12 : 152-, 2012

      22 Plummer M, "JAGS Version 1.0. 3 manual"

      23 Hrobjartsson A, "Is the placebo powerless? Update of a systematic review with 52 new randomized trials comparing placebo with no treatment" 256 : 91-100, 2004

      24 Ioannidis JP, "Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses" 181 : 488-493, 2009

      25 Salanti G, "Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial" 64 : 163-171, 2011

      26 Brooks SP, "General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations" 7 : 434-455, 1998

      27 Rosenberg W, "Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving" 310 : 1122-1126, 1995

      28 Lieberman JA, "Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia" 353 : 1209-1223, 2005

      29 Hoaglin DC, "Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2" 14 : 429-437, 2011

      30 Leucht S, "Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis" 382 : 951-962, 2013

      31 Cipriani A, "Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis" 373 : 746-758, 2009

      32 Asenjo Lobos C, "Clozapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006633-, 2010

      33 Dias S, "Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis" 29 : 932-944, 2010

      34 Valkenhoef G, "Automating network meta-analysis" 3 : 285-299, 2012

      35 Komossa K, "Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006569-, 2009

      36 Khanna P, "Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" 2 : CD006569-, 2013

      37 Komossa K, "Amisulpride versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia" CD006624-, 2010

      38 Haddad PM, "Adverse effects of atypical antipsychotics: differential risk and clinical implications" 21 : 911-936, 2007

      39 Takeuchi H, "A systematic review of reported cases involving psychotic symptoms worsened by aripiprazole in schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder" 228 : 175-185, 2013

      40 Klemp M, "A review and Bayesian meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and adverse effects of 4 atypical neuroleptic drugs compared with haloperidol and placebo" 31 : 698-704, 2011

      41 Tu YK, "A primer on network meta-analysis for dental research" 2012 : 276520-, 2012

      42 Kerwin R, "A multicentre, randomized, naturalistic, open-label study between aripiprazole and standard of care in the management of community-treated schizophrenic patients Schizophrenia Trial of Aripiprazole: (STAR) study" 22 : 433-443, 2007

      43 Davis JM, "A meta-analysis of the efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics" 60 : 553-564, 2003

      44 Leucht S, "A meta-analysis of head-to-head comparisons of second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia" 166 : 152-163, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.42 0.21 1.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.77 0.51 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼