RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    Current and Future CONSIDERATIONS for the Use of Artificial Intelligence by the United States’ Department of Defense

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107324400

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: The “Narrow” AI technologies and its application to different sectors in the U.S. have brought tre-mendous advantages to the country and its citizens. This paper attempts to examine the opportunities and risks of AI’s potential application to the military health care sector. Yet, some human rights concerns remain. This paper further argues that the new Biden administration should pursue policies that reinforce a human-centric AI to be more supportive of human rights.
    Method: This paper employs the politics of responsibility theory to examine the present and future of AI re-sponsible governance in the Biden era. Based on resources from various AI related research by the U.S. gov-ernment, scholars, and experts, this paper further attempts to examine the opportunities and challenges in the ethical area that will likely be generated by applying AI to the American system of military health care.
    Results: This paper finds that the application of AI in military health care would likely provide immense op-portunities, especially in times of COVID-19. However, there are risks posed by the application of AI in various sectors as well as in military health care. Meanwhile, the new Biden administration’s future policymaking stage should emphasize ways in which AI may remain human-centric to be more supportive of human rights.
    Conclusion: In incorporating AI into virtually every economic sector and into daily life, the U.S. government, together with all sectors of society, should seek ways to maximize opportunities and minimize the risk of over-dependence or unregulated exposure to an intelligence far beyond the human level. The new Biden administra-tion should be at the forefront in promoting responsible AI policymaking to be more supportive of human rights.
    번역하기

    Purpose: The “Narrow” AI technologies and its application to different sectors in the U.S. have brought tre-mendous advantages to the country and its citizens. This paper attempts to examine the opportunities and risks of AI’s potential applicat...

    Purpose: The “Narrow” AI technologies and its application to different sectors in the U.S. have brought tre-mendous advantages to the country and its citizens. This paper attempts to examine the opportunities and risks of AI’s potential application to the military health care sector. Yet, some human rights concerns remain. This paper further argues that the new Biden administration should pursue policies that reinforce a human-centric AI to be more supportive of human rights.
    Method: This paper employs the politics of responsibility theory to examine the present and future of AI re-sponsible governance in the Biden era. Based on resources from various AI related research by the U.S. gov-ernment, scholars, and experts, this paper further attempts to examine the opportunities and challenges in the ethical area that will likely be generated by applying AI to the American system of military health care.
    Results: This paper finds that the application of AI in military health care would likely provide immense op-portunities, especially in times of COVID-19. However, there are risks posed by the application of AI in various sectors as well as in military health care. Meanwhile, the new Biden administration’s future policymaking stage should emphasize ways in which AI may remain human-centric to be more supportive of human rights.
    Conclusion: In incorporating AI into virtually every economic sector and into daily life, the U.S. government, together with all sectors of society, should seek ways to maximize opportunities and minimize the risk of over-dependence or unregulated exposure to an intelligence far beyond the human level. The new Biden administra-tion should be at the forefront in promoting responsible AI policymaking to be more supportive of human rights.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 McCain J,

    2 West D, "rning Point: Policymaking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence"

    3 "https://www.whitehouse.gov/"

    4 "https://www.reuters.com/"

    5 "https://www.reuters.com/"

    6 "https://www.brookings.edu/"

    7 "https://www.brookings.edu/"

    8 "https://www.bbc.com/"

    9 "https://predictiontechnology.ucla.edu/"

    10 "https://militarybenefits.info/"

    1 McCain J,

    2 West D, "rning Point: Policymaking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence"

    3 "https://www.whitehouse.gov/"

    4 "https://www.reuters.com/"

    5 "https://www.reuters.com/"

    6 "https://www.brookings.edu/"

    7 "https://www.brookings.edu/"

    8 "https://www.bbc.com/"

    9 "https://predictiontechnology.ucla.edu/"

    10 "https://militarybenefits.info/"

    11 Bialek A, "What’s the Big Deal about Privacy?" 10 (10): 1-6, 2020

    12 박균열, "Virtue for Post COVID-19 and AI Technology" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 8-18, 2020

    13 Burri T, "The Politics of Robot Autonomy" 7 (7): 341-360, 2016

    14 Baru C, "The National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan"

    15 Sikkink K, "The Hidden Face of Rights toward a Politics of Responsibilities" Yale University 2020

    16 Yi Li, "The Advent of AI and Its Some Implications to MILITARY AFFAIRS" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 38-47, 2020

    17 Anand SR, "Sizing the Prize: What’s the Real Value of AI for Your Business and How Can You Capitalize?"

    18 Himmerlreich J., "Responsibility for Killer Robots" 22 : 731-747, 2019

    19 Harris L., "Overview of Artificial Intelligence"

    20 Mendez B, "Military Medical Malpractice and the Feres Doctrine" 2019

    21 Vought R, "Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Guidance for Regulations of Artificial Intelligence Applications" 2106 : 1-16, 2020

    22 Rodrigues R., "Legal and Human Rights Issues of AI: Gaps, Challenges and Vulnerabilities" 4 : 1-12, 2020

    23 Maas M, "Innovation-proof Global Governance for Military Artificial Intelligence?" 10 : 129-158, 2019

    24 김현수, "Ethical Issues on AI Equipped Combat ROBOTS" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 1-7, 2020

    25 Sayler K., "Emerging Military Technologies: Background and Issues for Congress"

    26 Obermeyer Z, "Dissecting Racial Biases in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations" 366 (366): 447-453, 2019

    27 Work R., "Department of Defense: Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, and Cloud Taxonomy"

    28 "Defense Innovation Board. AI Principles: Recommendations on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence"

    29 Scott I, "Can AI Help in the Fight against Covid-19? Period" 2013 (2013): 439-441, 2020

    30 박균열, "COVID-19 and Some Implications to AI" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 16-24, 2020

    31 Eubanks V, "Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile"

    32 Harmon S, "Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of COVID-19 Pneumonia on Chest CT Using Multinational Datasets" 11 : 4080-4080, 2020

    33 Sayler K, "Artificial Intelligence and National Security" 2020

    34 Panch T, "Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Bias: Implications for Health Systems" 9 (9): 1-5, 2019

    35 Yi Li, "AI Ethics and Privacy Right" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 27-33, 2020

    36 Saetra H., "A Shallow Defense of a Technocracy of Artificial Intelligence: Examining the Political Harms of Algorithmic Governance in the Domain of Government" 62 : 1-10, 2020

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2025 평가 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
    2022-06-01 등재 등재후보학술지 취소
    2020-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼