연구개발조직의 창의적 연구환경과 효과성 : 정부출연연구기관에 대한 탐색적 연구 = Creative R&D Environments and Organizational Effectiveness : An Exploratory Study on the Korean Government-Supported Research Institutes

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구에서는 국가 경쟁력 강화와 정부출연연구기관(이하 출연(연))의 연구수월성 제고를 위한 연구환경을 탐색하였다. 구체적으로 창의적 연구환경이 조직효과성의 관점에서 고성과 R&D조직과 저성과 R&D조직간에 어떤 차이가 나는지를 비교하였다. 분석 자료는 42개 출연(연)의 박사급 연구인력 864명을 대상으로 설문조사를 통해 자료를 수집하고, 창의적 연구환경에 대한탐색적 이론의 틀로부터 도출된 8개의 가설을 검증하였다. 자료의 검증을 위해서 요인분석, 상관관계분석, 분산분석 그리고 T-test를 수행하였다. 연구의 주요 결과는 첫째, R&D역량 제고를 위한 창의적 연구환경은 관리시스템 환경과 창의적 문화 환경으로 분류되었다. 관리시스템 환경에는 유동성, 다양성, 공정성 그리고 독립성이 제시되었고, 창의적 문화 환경에는 자율성, 연결성, 중첩성 그리고 유연성이 포함되었다. 둘째, 관리시스템 환경 중에서 유동성과 공정성은 저성과 R&D조직보다 고성과 R&D조직에서 더 높게 나타났다. 셋째, 창의적 문화 환경 중에서 자율성, 연결성 그리고 중첩성은 저성과 R&D조직보다 고성과 R&D조직에서 더 높게 나타났다. 이는 창의적 연구환경과 R&D조직의 효과성이 밀접한 관계가 있음을 보여주는 결과이다. 이와 같은 결과에 따라, 출연(연)의 연구수월성 제고를 위해서는 연구개발의 평가와보상에 대한 공정성, 연구개발 활동의 자을성, 지식공유 네트워크 형성을 위한 연구 인력의 연결성, 연구개발 자원의 중첩성 그리고 혁신지향적인 조직의 유연성 등과 같은 창의적 연구환경의 조성이 필요하다. 출연(연)의 특성으로 인해 관계성이 분명하게 판명되지는 못했지만, 연구협력을 위한 유동성, 연구 인력의 다양성, 연구기관의 독립성 등에 대해서토 관리역량의 집중이 요구된다. 정부는 출연(연)의 창조적 긴장을 통한 연구 성과의 제고를 위해서 관리통제(지배구조)와 연구수월성 간에 균형된 관점에서 보다 혁신적이고 창조적인 R&D정책을 모색해야 한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study seeks to understand creative R&D environments in Korean Government-supported Research Institutes(hereinafter KGRI). The main purpose of this study is to measure and compare the differences of creative R&D environments between high performing KGRI and low performing KGRI from leveraging organizational effectiveness perspectives. The survey data was collected from a sample of 864 principal investigators in 42 KGRI, and 8 hypotheses in 2 categories derived from research framework of creative R&D environments were tested. And factor analysis, correlation analysis, MANOVA and T-test analyses have been conducted for the statistical tests. There are three major findings of this study. First, The creative R&D environments for the development of R&D competence was classified into two groups, namely managerial system environment (mobility, diversity, equity, independency) and creative culture environment (autonomy, connectivity, redundancy, flexibility). Second, mobility and equity out of the components of managerial system environment appeared higher in high performing KGRI than low performing KGRI. Third, autonomy, connectivity and redundancy out of the components of creative culture environment appeared higher in high performing KGRI than low performing KGRI. Therefore, this study found that the creative R&D environments is closely related to effectiveness of R&D organizations. In this regard, Korean government is possible to choose more innovative and creative R&D policies, considering balanced perspectives between management control system (governance structure) and R&D effectiveness for fluctuation and creative intension of KGRI.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 초 록
• Ⅰ. 서 론
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
• Ⅲ. 연구가설
• Ⅳ. 연구방법
• Ⅴ. 연구결과와 논의
• Ⅵ. 연구의 결론 및 시사점
• 참고문헌
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임선하, "창의성에의 초대" 1993

2 김계수, "정부출연연구기관과 질" (127) : 2001

3 최종인, "의사소통의 형태와 팀 창의성에 관한 실증적 연구 인사관리연구" 한국인사관리학회 245-270, 1996a

4 유성재, "연구회 및 정부출연연구기관의 새로운 경영모형 5개 연구회" 2002

5 송성수, "연구개발활동에 관한 지표의 국제비교" (127) : 2001

6 박헌준, "연구개발팀의 다양성과 혁신적 성과 한국기업의 변화와 혁신" 한국인사조직학회 편저 다산출판사 1997

7 손태원, "연구개발성과의 제고를 위한 창의성 개발 산업경영연구" 203-222, 1993

8 손태원, "디지털 경제시대의 창의성경영" 한국학술진흥재단 2002

9 김인수, "기술혁신의 과정과 정책 한국개발연구원" 1982187-208

10 고상원, "고급 과학기술인력의 학연산 유동성 실태조사 및 제고방안 과학기술정책연구원" 2001

11 최종인, "개인창의성 연구의 개념적 고찰 경영연구" 고려대학교 51-77, 1996b

12 Thomas,K, "does empowerment always work:Understanding the role of intrinsic motivation and personal interpretation" 6 : 39-54, 1994

13 Pelz, "and stimulation in relation to scientific achievement" auto (auto): 89-97, 1966

14 Kanter, "and social conditions for innovation in organizations in Research in organizational behavior" JAL Press 169-211, 1988

15 Leventhal, "What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? In K Advances in Theory and Research" Plenum Press 1980

16 "Wealth from Knowledge" Macmillan 1972

17 Keller,R.T, "Transformational Leadership and the Performance of Research and Development Project Group" 489-501 1992

18 Woodman, "Toward a theory of organizational creativity Academy of Management Review" 293-321, 1993

19 Rogers,C, "Toward a theory of creativity" 249-260, 1954

20 Isaksen, "Theoretical perspectives on creative learning and its facilitation Journal of Creative Behavior" 9-17, 1983

21 Maidique,M.A, "The new product learning cycle" 14 : 299-313, 1985

22 Yeh,Quey-Jen, "The link between managerial style and the job characteristic of R&D professionals" 26 (26): 127-140, 1996

23 Shaw, "The Psychology of Small Group Behavior" McGraw-Hill 1971

24 Ketchen,D.J, "Strategic response to poor organizational performance:A test of competing perspectives" 25 (25): 683-706, 1999

25 Pelz, "Scientists in Organization" 1976

26 A, "R&D Work Climate and Innovation in Semiconductors Academy of Management Journal" 363-368, 1983

27 Redmond, "Putting creativity to work Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity" 120-151, 1993

28 Leonard,D, "Putting Your Company's Whole Brain to Work" july -august : 111-121, 1997

29 McConnell,J, "Productivity improvement in research and development and engineering in the United States" 5-14, 1980

30 Spector,P.E, "Perceived control by employees:A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work" 39 : 1005-1016, 1986

31 "Organizational Innovation in the Japanese Basic Research Hitotsubashi Journal of Commerce & Management" kusu (kusu): 1993

32 Kim,Linsu, "Organizational Innovation and Structure" 225-245, 1980

33 Alexander, "Observations on Organizational Factors Affecting Creativity" Univ of Chicago Press 1965

34 Dougherty, "New Products in Old Organizations The Myth of the Better Mousetrap in Search of the Beaten path Sloan School of Management" 1987

35 Glynn, "Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations Academy of Management Review" 286-307, 1999

36 Siegel, "Measuring the Perceived Support for Innovation in Organizations Journal of Applied Psychology" 1978

37 Gupta, "Managing human resources for innovation and creativity" 41-48, 1993

38 Glassman, "Managing for creativity Back to basics in R&D" 175-183, 1986

39 Souder,W.E, "Managing New Product Innovations" Lexington 1987

40 Kiesler,S.B, "Interpersonal Processes in Groups and Organization" 1978

41 King, "Innovation at work Innovation and Creativity at Work" 15-59, 1990

42 Adams, "Inequity in social exchange Advances in Experimental Social Psychology" Academic Press 272-283, 1965

43 Cater,C, "Industrial Policy and innovation" Heinemann 1981

44 McPherson, "Individual Versus the Group Approach to Creativity America Society of Mechanical Engineers Monograph" 65-, 1965

45 Leonard, "Igniting Creativity in Group" Harvard Business School Press 1999

46 Badawy,M.K, "How to prevent creativity mismanagement" 28-35 1986

47 Paolillo,J, "How organizational factors affect R&D innovation" 21 : 12-15, 1978

48 Pfeffer, "Hospital Demography and Turnover Among Nurses" 158-173, 1987

49 Folger, "Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions Academy of Management Journal" & ko (& ko): 1989

50 Ancona,D.G, "Demography and design:Predictors of new product team performance" 3 : 321-341, 1992

51 Amabile, "Creativity in the R&D Laboratory Center for Creative Leadership" 1987

52 in Ford, "Creative Action in Organization" SAGE Publications Inc 1995

53 New York, "Competence at work Models for superior performance" Inc 1993

54 Amabile, "Changes in the Work Environment for Creativity during Downsizing Academy of Management" 630-640, 1999

55 McEvily,B, "Bridging Ties:a Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities" 20 : 1133-1156, 1999

56 Amabile, "Assessing the work environment for creativity Academy of Management Journal" 1154-1184, 1996

57 James W, "Assessing The Effectiveness of Research Organizations" 1995197-216

58 People Management, "Are Competencies Too Much of a Good Thing?" 1996

59 Cervantes, "Analysis of Science and Technology Labour Markets in OECD Countries OECD Workshop on Science and Technology Labour Markets" 1999

60 Katz, "An investigation into managerial role and career paths of gatekeepers and project supervisors in a major R&D Facility" 103-110, 1981

61 Tierney, "An Examination of Leadership and Employee Creativity The relevance of Traits and Relationships" 591-620, 1990

62 Cohen,W.M, "Absortive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation" 35 : 128-152, 1990

63 Noe, "A meta- analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction Journal of Applied Psychology" 280-289, 1985

64 A, "A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness Journal of Management" 679-704, 1997

65 Keller,R.T, "A Test of the Path-Goal Theory of Leadership with Need for Clarity as a Moderator in Research and Development Organization" 74 (74): 208-212, 1989

66 Scarborough, "A Study of the Relationship of the Creative Environment to Scientific Creativity and the Managerial Climate of a Creative Research Laboratory" the George Washington University 1973

67 Amabile,T.M, "A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations" 123-167, 1988

68 Szakonyi,R, "101 tips managing R&D more effectively-II" 33 (33): 41-46, 1990b

69 Szakonyi,R, "101 tips managing R&D more effectively-I" 33 (33): 31-36, 1990a