집단정서의 수렴과 영향요인 = Affect Convergence and the Antecedents of Group Affect

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본고에서는 작업집단 구성원의 정서가 서로 수렴하여 집단속성으로 정의될 수 있는지, 그리고 집단속성으로 정의된 집단정서의 다양한 유형에 팀장의 변혁적 리더십, 구성원의 감정지능, 집단의 응집성 등이 어떤 영향을 미치는지를 연구하였다. 이를 위해 4개 기업의 41팀으로부터 팀장을 포함한 320명의 설문을 분석에 이용하였다. 주요 연구 변수로 우선 정서원형구조(affect circumplex)에 의거한 8가지 정서들이 집단수준에서 수렴되는지를 검증하였다. 검증 결과 8가지 정서유형 모두에서 유의한 결과를 얻었다. 즉, 모든 정서는 집단 상황에서 집단정서로 정의될 수 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 집단정서의 영향요인에 대한 검증에서 변혁적 리더십은 긍정적 집단정서인 열정과 기쁨의 정도를 높여주고 부정적 정서인 불쾌와 피로를 감소시키는 것으로 나타났다. 두 번째 영향요인으로서 집단구성원의 감정지능은 하위 구성요소별로 차별화된 영향관계가 나타났으나 전반적으로 볼 때 다소 약한 영향관계를 보여주었다. 마지막으로 집단응집성은 저활성화 정서인 안정을 제외한 모든 집단정서 유형에 광범위한 영향을 미치고 있었다. 본 연구를 통해 한국기업 작업집단에서도 정서의 수렴현상이 나타남을 확인할 수 있었으며, 집단정서에 영향을 미치는 주요 선행요인의 영향관계를 실증적으로 규명하였다. 이러한 발견에 기초하여 향후 집단내 정서의 암묵적 공유과정과 명시적 공유과정에 대한 심층적 연구를 위한 제언을 하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigates the affect convergence and the key antecedents of group affect in organizational contexts. Recent research has shown collective properties of affect in various work group settings. Group affect develops from implicit and explicit sharing processes of affective experiences among group members. Traditionally Korean work groups have been considered a field of sharing intense emotions among group members, partly because of collectivist and confucianist values. Nonetheless, the collective properties of group affect have not been examined yet in Korean work groups. To examine this, affect is categorized into eight types as suggested by the affect circumplex model: activated pleasantness, pleasantness, unactivated pleasantness, activated unpleasantness, unpleasantness, unactivated unpleasantness, and high and low activation. The hypothesis for testing affect convergence is as follows. H1 : Affective experiences among group members will converge for all of the eight distinct affect categories. Three key variables are adopted as the antecedents which strongly influence implicit and explicit sharing processes of affective experiences in Korean work groups : transformational leadership of team manager, average emotional intelligence of group members, and group cohesiveness. Below are the hypotheses developed for this study. H2 : Transformational leadership will be positively associated with all three types of positive group affect, i.e. activated pleasantness, pleasantness, and unactivated pleasantness, while negatively with all three types of negative affect, i.e., activated unpleasantness, unpleasantness, and unactivated unpleasantness. In addition, transformational leadership will be positively associated with high activation, while negatively with low activation. H3 : Average emotional intelligence of group members will be positively associated with all three types of positive group affect, i.e. activated pleasantness, pleasantness, and unactivated pleasantness, while negatively with all three types of negative affect, i.e., activated unpleasantness, unpleasantness, and unactivated unpleasantness). In addition, it will be positively associated with high activation, while negatively with low activation. H4 : Group cohesiveness will be positively associated with all three types of positive group affect, i.e. activated pleasantness, pleasantness, and unactivated pleasantness, while negatively with all three types of negative affect, i.e., activated unpleasantness, unpleasantness, and unactivated unpleasantness. The survey data are collected from 320 employees in 41 teams of four organizations, representing printing, construction, and rental service industries. Hypothesis 1 is tested by two complimentary measures: intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) and within-group agreement measure(rwg). As predicted, work groups have converged for all of the eight distinct affect categories. Affect convergence appears to be stronger than in the findings by Bartel and Saavedra(2002), suggesting the collective nature of Korean work groups. In order to test subsequent hypotheses, individual level data are aggregated to group level data, resulting sample of 41 teams. Regression analyses of the group level data indicates that transformational leadership exerts significantly positive influence on pleasantness and activated pleasantness and negative influence on unpleasantness and unactivated unpleasantness. Emotional intelligence is operationalized in terms of the four branch ability model. Unfortunately, emotional intelligence shows only the marginal influence on the group level affect. Overall, the dimension of perceiving others’ emotion exerts stronger influence than the other dimensions of emotional intelligence. On the other hand, group cohesiveness shows strong influence on group affect as hypothesized, except for the case of only one affect type, low activation.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 이론적배경과연구가설
• Ⅲ. 연구의방법
• Ⅳ. 연구의결과
• Ⅴ. 결론및제언

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 권석균, "직무정서의 구조적 특성과 영향요인" 한국인사조직학회 5 (5): 1-53, 1997

2 이창준, "정서와 리더십에 대한 한 이론적 모형의 검증: 카리스마적 및 감성적 리더십, 집단정서, 집단효과성" 한국인사·조직학회 15 (15): 1-51, 2007

3 권석균, "공기업 조직구성원의 변혁적거래적 리더십과 리더신뢰" 한국인사관리학회 28 (28): 173-208, 2004

4 James, L. R., "rwg: An assessment of withingroup interrater agreement" 78 : 306-309, 1993

5 Starratt, A., "Young workers’ experiences of abusive leadership" 31 : 136-158, 2010

6 Jordan, P. J., "Workgroup emotional intelligence: Scale development and relationship to team process effectiveness and goal focus" 12 : 195-214, 2002

7 Barsade, S. G., "Why does affect matter in organizations?" Academy of Management Perspectives 36-59, 2007

8 George, J. M., "When bad mood foster creativity and good one’s don’t: The role of content and clarity of feeling" 87 : 687-697, 2002

9 Watson, D., "Toward a consensual structure of mood" 98 : 219-235, 1985

10 Power, M. J., "The structure of emotion: An empirical comparison of six models" 20 : 694-713, 2006

11 Mano, H., "The structure and intensity of emotional experiences: Method and context convergence" 26 : 389-411, 1991

12 Hogg, M. A., "The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity" New York University Press 1992

13 Seo, M. G., "The role of affective experience in work motivation" 29 : 423-439, 2004

14 Barsade, S. G., "The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior" 47 : 644-675, 2002

15 Mullen, B., "The relationship between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration" 115 : 210-227, 1994

16 Walter, F., "The positive group affect spiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups" 29 : 239-261, 2008

17 Diener, E., "The independence of positive and negative affect" 47 : 1105-1107, 1985

18 George, J. M., "The experience of work and turnover intentions: Interactive effects of value attainment, job satisfaction, and positive mood" 81 : 318-325, 1996

19 Dobbins, G. H., "The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction" 11 (11): 203-219, 1986

20 Wong, C. S., "The effect of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study" 13 : 243-274, 2002

21 Bartel, C. A., "The construction of workgroup moods" 45 : 197-231, 2000

22 Law, K. S., "The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies" 89 : 483-496, 2004

23 Duffy, M. K., "The Salieri syndrome: Consequences of envy in groups" 31 : 3-23, 2000

24 Larsen, J. R., "Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. in: Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Emotional and Social Behavior" Press 25-59, 1992

25 Fredrickson, B. L., "Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires" 19 : 313-332, 2005

26 Isen, A. M., "Positive affect as a factor in organizational behavior" JAI Press 13 : 1-53, 1991

27 George J. M., "Personality, affect, and behavior in groups" 75 : 107-116, 1990

28 Brief, A. P., "Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace" 53 : 279-307, 2002

29 Russell, J. A., "On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect" 125 : 3-30, 1999

30 Forgas, J. P., "On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiation strategies and outcomes" 74 : 565-577, 1998

31 Friedman, H. S., "Nonverbal skill, personal charisma, and initial attraction" 14 : 203-211, 1988

32 Zaccaro, S. J., "Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality" 131 : 387-399, 1991

33 Sinclair, R. C., "Mood, categorization breadth, and performance appraisal: The effects of order of information acquisition and affective states on halo, accuracy, information retrieval, and evaluations" 42 : 22-46, 1988

34 Siemer, M., "Mood as multiple-object directed and as objectless affective states: An examination of the dispositional theory of moods" 19 : 815-847, 2005

35 Kelly, J. R., "Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams" 86 : 99-130, 2001

36 George J. M., "Leaders positive mood and group performance: The case of customer service" 25 : 778-794, 1995

37 Shrout, P. E., "Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability" 86 (86): 420-428, 1979

38 Hackman, J. R., "Group influences on individuals in organizations" Consulting Psychologists Press 3 : 199-267, 1992

39 Barsade, S. G., "Group emotion: A view from top and bottom. in: Research on Managing Group and Teams" JAI Press 81-102, 1998

40 Fineman, S., "Getting the measure of emotion-and the cautionary tale of emotional intelligence" 57 : 719-740, 2004

41 Forgas, J. P., "Feeling and doing: Affective influences on interpersonal behavior" 13 : 1-28, 2002

42 Gotlib, I. H., "Factor analysis of the multiple affect adjective check list: A separation of positive and negative affect" 50 : 1161-1165, 1986

43 James, L. R., "Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias" 69 : 85-98, 1984

44 George, J. M., "Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence" 53 : 1027-105, 2000

45 Mayer, J. D., "Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications" 15 : 197-215, 2004

46 Caruso, D. R., "Emotional intelligence in the workplace. in: Emotional intelligence in everyday life" Psychology Press 2001

47 Howard, D. J., "Emotional contagion effect on product attitudes" 28 : 189-201, 2001

48 Ashforth, B. E., "Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal" 48 : 97-125, 1995

49 Beedie, C. J., "Distinctions between emotion and mood" 19 : 847-878, 2005

50 Williams, K. L., "Demography and diversity in organizations:A review of 40 years of research" 20 : 77-140, 1998

51 Tepper, B. J., "Consequences of abusive supervision" 43 : 178-190, 2000

52 Zaccaro, S. J., "Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality" 128 : 547-558, 1988

53 Beal, D. J., "Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations" 88 : 989-1004, 2003

54 Conger, J. A., "Charismatic leadership in organizations" Sage 1998

55 Fiedler, K., "Affective influences on social information processing. in: Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 163-185, 2001

56 Amabile, T. M., "Affect and creativity at work" 50 : 367-403, 2005

57 Tepper, B. J., "Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda" 33 : 261-289, 2007

58 Robbins, T. L., "A closer look at interpersonal affect as a distinct influence on cognitive processing in performance evaluations" 79 : 341-353, 1994