RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    1920년대 영국의 기술교육 문제 = 정부와 기업가들의 반응을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60134309

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    After experiencing the immediate postwar inflationary boom, the economic scene of Britain soon became gloomy. There were a series of industrial disputes by miners, engineering workers and railwaymen during 1919~21, demanding higher wages. The situation was aggravated by growing foreign competition and the relatively weak export performance of British industry in the international market. The state began to reduce its involvement in the economy which had been enormously expanded during the war and concurrently attempted to scrutinize public spending with great care.
    In accordance with the growing hardening of economic conditions, in the 1920s a great deal of concern was urgently given to the importance and need for technical education by successive governments and vested interests. Under the presidency of Lord Eustace Percy the Board of Education had vigorously made efforts to improve the relationship, in general, between education and industry, as well as technical education itself. Several inquiries were launched by the Board and the results of these investigations were published. In addition to the national-level employers' organizations such as the FBI, many progressive industrialists had openly demonstrated their keen interest in education and this concern soon led to the creation of their national organization in 1919 known as the AEIC.
    Despite substantial progress and actual achievements, however, the traditional framework which had hindered rapid improvement of technical education since the nineteenth century was little changed. Though there were a series of investigations throughout the period which emphasized the importance and need of technical education, most of their recommendations were not put into practice, markedly due to the doctrine of economic stringency exerted by the Treasury over the period. Despite the growing recognition within the industrial world towards the need for trained manpower, the number of progressive industrialists was still relatively small, especially in terms of pressing their interests upon industry as a whole with any momentum. In a word, the problems were again diagnosed but not cured.
    번역하기

    After experiencing the immediate postwar inflationary boom, the economic scene of Britain soon became gloomy. There were a series of industrial disputes by miners, engineering workers and railwaymen during 1919~21, demanding higher wages. The situatio...

    After experiencing the immediate postwar inflationary boom, the economic scene of Britain soon became gloomy. There were a series of industrial disputes by miners, engineering workers and railwaymen during 1919~21, demanding higher wages. The situation was aggravated by growing foreign competition and the relatively weak export performance of British industry in the international market. The state began to reduce its involvement in the economy which had been enormously expanded during the war and concurrently attempted to scrutinize public spending with great care.
    In accordance with the growing hardening of economic conditions, in the 1920s a great deal of concern was urgently given to the importance and need for technical education by successive governments and vested interests. Under the presidency of Lord Eustace Percy the Board of Education had vigorously made efforts to improve the relationship, in general, between education and industry, as well as technical education itself. Several inquiries were launched by the Board and the results of these investigations were published. In addition to the national-level employers' organizations such as the FBI, many progressive industrialists had openly demonstrated their keen interest in education and this concern soon led to the creation of their national organization in 1919 known as the AEIC.
    Despite substantial progress and actual achievements, however, the traditional framework which had hindered rapid improvement of technical education since the nineteenth century was little changed. Though there were a series of investigations throughout the period which emphasized the importance and need of technical education, most of their recommendations were not put into practice, markedly due to the doctrine of economic stringency exerted by the Treasury over the period. Despite the growing recognition within the industrial world towards the need for trained manpower, the number of progressive industrialists was still relatively small, especially in terms of pressing their interests upon industry as a whole with any momentum. In a word, the problems were again diagnosed but not cured.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 산업구조 변화와 신기술인력 요구 증대
    • Ⅲ. 정부의 반응과 한계
    • Ⅳ. 기업가들의 반응과 한계
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 산업구조 변화와 신기술인력 요구 증대
    • Ⅲ. 정부의 반응과 한계
    • Ⅳ. 기업가들의 반응과 한계
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • 〈Abstract〉
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼