RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국민의 형사재판 참여 = A Study on the Citizen"s Participation in Korean Criminal Trial

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76441911

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The national assembly of the Republic of Korea legislated for the citizen"s participation system in criminal trial for the first time in 2007. The system was enforced from January 2008 and is mingled with the factors of jury system and the factors of mixed court system [Sch?ffengerichtsbarkeit]. And the system"s destiny will be decided after it"s experimental operation for five years. First, this paper examines the history of the arguments about the adoption of the citizen"s participation system in judicial decision making in Korea. During the late 1920"s, there was an argument about the adoption of the citizen"s participation system in judicial decision making for the first time in Korea. However, it did not come true mainly because Korea was put under Japanese"s colonial rule at the time. Indeed the argument in Korea was caused by the fact that the Japanese Diet passed the Jury Act in 1923. And then it was debated again during the late 1940"s in Korea, but it did not come true similarly. At that time, it was the post-colonial period, thus Korea was in condition that was difficult to adopt the citizen"s participation system in judicial decision making. Subsequently, the government, the justice authorities and civil society have taken interest in the matter since the late 1990"s in Korea. I understand that it stands on the series of democratization having been evolved since the late 1980"s in Korea. In the event, Korea adopted the citizen"s participation system in criminal trial for the first time by legislation in 2007. And then, after examining the contents of the current system, this paper proposes some improvements that can develop the system successfully in Korea.
    번역하기

      The national assembly of the Republic of Korea legislated for the citizen"s participation system in criminal trial for the first time in 2007. The system was enforced from January 2008 and is mingled with the factors of jury system an...

      The national assembly of the Republic of Korea legislated for the citizen"s participation system in criminal trial for the first time in 2007. The system was enforced from January 2008 and is mingled with the factors of jury system and the factors of mixed court system [Sch?ffengerichtsbarkeit]. And the system"s destiny will be decided after it"s experimental operation for five years. First, this paper examines the history of the arguments about the adoption of the citizen"s participation system in judicial decision making in Korea. During the late 1920"s, there was an argument about the adoption of the citizen"s participation system in judicial decision making for the first time in Korea. However, it did not come true mainly because Korea was put under Japanese"s colonial rule at the time. Indeed the argument in Korea was caused by the fact that the Japanese Diet passed the Jury Act in 1923. And then it was debated again during the late 1940"s in Korea, but it did not come true similarly. At that time, it was the post-colonial period, thus Korea was in condition that was difficult to adopt the citizen"s participation system in judicial decision making. Subsequently, the government, the justice authorities and civil society have taken interest in the matter since the late 1990"s in Korea. I understand that it stands on the series of democratization having been evolved since the late 1980"s in Korea. In the event, Korea adopted the citizen"s participation system in criminal trial for the first time by legislation in 2007. And then, after examining the contents of the current system, this paper proposes some improvements that can develop the system successfully in Korea.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
      Ⅱ. 국민참여 재판제도의 도입논의 및 입법의 경과
      Ⅲ. 국민참여 형사재판제도의 주요 내용
      Ⅳ. 국민참여 형사재판제도의 정착과 발전을 위한 몇 가지 제언
      Ⅴ. 맺음말
      참고문헌
      【Abstract】
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
      Ⅱ. 국민참여 재판제도의 도입논의 및 입법의 경과
      Ⅲ. 국민참여 형사재판제도의 주요 내용
      Ⅳ. 국민참여 형사재판제도의 정착과 발전을 위한 몇 가지 제언
      Ⅴ. 맺음말
      참고문헌
      【Abstract】
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼