RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국의 보수단체의 이념적 분화 = Ideological Division of Conservative NGOs in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75500950

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The conservatives in Korea, who met a crisis of losing their privilege after democratization in Korea, tried to expand conservatism and to organize NGOs. In these days they held big rallies and conducted extreme and violent performances. However, some of them showed a little changes and tried to be separated from ultra rightists. They may be called the conservative NGOs in that they do not want to be extremes and tried to accomodate themselves to changed reality. Ideological difference between the conservative NGOs and the extreme rightist NGOs is not essential. Both of them emphasize liberal democracy, strengthening ROK-US alliance, sending Korean troops to Iraq, Criticizing North Korea, protecting free market, and opposing to repealing National Security Law, to equalizing high schools and to moving administrative capital. The conservative NGOs, however, wants to look different from the extreme rightist NGOs and tries to be separated from them. The conservatives recognized that Korean society has changed since democratization in Korea and post-Cold War period. Therefore they don`t think that they must continuously oppose to the democratic force. Rather, they accent integrated society, economic aid to North Korea, and even abolition of patriarchic laws. They also try to seek coexistence with present government. Their ideology is thought to be practical and nationalistic, but seems to be in confusion. In addition, they may join extreme rights again whenever the rights gain power. Therefore continuous democratization and reforms are needed in Korea in order for them to keep on improving themselves.
      번역하기

      The conservatives in Korea, who met a crisis of losing their privilege after democratization in Korea, tried to expand conservatism and to organize NGOs. In these days they held big rallies and conducted extreme and violent performances. However, some...

      The conservatives in Korea, who met a crisis of losing their privilege after democratization in Korea, tried to expand conservatism and to organize NGOs. In these days they held big rallies and conducted extreme and violent performances. However, some of them showed a little changes and tried to be separated from ultra rightists. They may be called the conservative NGOs in that they do not want to be extremes and tried to accomodate themselves to changed reality. Ideological difference between the conservative NGOs and the extreme rightist NGOs is not essential. Both of them emphasize liberal democracy, strengthening ROK-US alliance, sending Korean troops to Iraq, Criticizing North Korea, protecting free market, and opposing to repealing National Security Law, to equalizing high schools and to moving administrative capital. The conservative NGOs, however, wants to look different from the extreme rightist NGOs and tries to be separated from them. The conservatives recognized that Korean society has changed since democratization in Korea and post-Cold War period. Therefore they don`t think that they must continuously oppose to the democratic force. Rather, they accent integrated society, economic aid to North Korea, and even abolition of patriarchic laws. They also try to seek coexistence with present government. Their ideology is thought to be practical and nationalistic, but seems to be in confusion. In addition, they may join extreme rights again whenever the rights gain power. Therefore continuous democratization and reforms are needed in Korea in order for them to keep on improving themselves.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼