2009 영어과 교육과정 기본 어휘 지침이 교과서 개발에 미친 영향 = The Influence of Vocabulary Regulations in the 2009 National Curriculum of English on English Textbooks

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The present study attempted to investigate how vocabulary regulations stipulated in the 2009 National Curriculum of English have affected the development of English textbooks. That is, by comparing both vocabulary use and readability scores of the textbooks produced by the 2007 National Curriculum of English and those of 2009, this study tried to examine how the more recent vocabulary regulation has contributed to reducing Korean students’ learning burden. For this, a total of 24 textbooks, that is, 12 matching pairs of high school English textbooks from the 2007 and 2009 National Curriculum of English were analyzed. The results show that the vocabulary regulation of the 2009 National Curriculum of English has significantly contributed to reducing the total number of word families. However, the readability indices of the textbooks developed after the 2009 National Curriculum showed that the 2009 textbooks would be more challenging to read. The results also provide implications for the recent 2015 National Curriculum of English, which has the same educational rationale as that of 2009; the learning burden for vocabulary may be reduced, but controlling text difficulty is expected to be difficult. The study ends by providing some suggestions to complement the limitation of the 2015 National Curriculum of English.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 윤새봄, "초등학교 3, 4학년 영어 교과서 어휘 분석" 광주교육대학교 2015

2 성일호, "이독성공식과 Coh-Metrix를 활용한우리나라 고등학교 영어교과서 이독성 분석" 대한영어영문학회 40 (40): 299-320, 2014

3 임찬빈, "영어과 교육과정 개정안(시안) 개발 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2011

4 장경숙, "영어과 개정 교육과정의 기본 어휘* 목록" 한국영어교육학회 62 (62): 331-353, 2007

5 함미영, "영어 텍스트 수정이 텍스트 난이도와 응집성에 미치는 영향" 한국영어어문교육학회 19 (19): 335-355, 2013

6 이병민, "수능 영어 과목 평가 방식, 이대로 좋은가?" 한국교육개발원 2014

7 교육부, "사교육 경감 및 공교육 정상화 대책 발표"

8 김재은, "고등학교 영어 교과서, EBS 수능 연계 교재, 대학수학능력시험의 코퍼스기반 난이도 비교 분석" 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회 18 (18): 59-92, 2015

9 MetaMetrics, "What does the Lexile® measure mean?"

10 Hu, M., "Vocabulary density and reading comprehension" 13 (13): 403-430, 2000

11 Gunning, R., "The technique of clear writing" McGraw Hill 1952

12 DuBay, W., "The principles of readability" Impact Information 2004

13 Coxhead, A. J., "The development and evaluation of an academic word list" Victoria University of Wellington 1998

14 Chall, J. S., "The concept of readability" 26 : 23-33, 1949

15 Miles, T., "The Fog index: A practical readability scale" West Virginia University

16 Editcenteral, "Style & diction"

17 McLaughlin, G., "SMOG grading: A new readability formula" 12 (12): 639-346, 1969

18 Nation, I. S. P., "Researching and analyzing vocabulary" Heinle Cengage Learning 2011

19 Harrison, C., "Readability in the classroom" Cambridge University Press 1980

20 Gilland, J., "Readability" University of London Press 1972

21 Heatley, A., "RANGE and FREQUENCY programs"

22 Department of Defense, "Military specification manual, technical: General style and format requirement" Navy Publishing and Printing Service Office 1983

23 김정렬, "Coh-Metrix를 통한 초·중등 영어교과서 연계성 분석" 한국영어교육학회 67 (67): 319-341, 2012

24 전문기, "Coh-Metrix를 이용한 중학교 1학년과 2학년 개정 영어교과서 읽기 자료의 코퍼스 언어학적 연계성 분석" 언어과학회 56 (56): 201-218, 2011

25 Ogden, C. K., "Basic English: A general introduction with rules and grammar" Kegan Paul 1930

26 Senter, R., "Automated readability index" University of Cincinnati 1967

27 Flesch, R., "A new readability yardstick" 32 (32): 221-233, 1948

28 Coxhead, A. J., "A new academic word list" 34 (34): 213-238, 2000

29 West, M., "A general service list of English words" Longman 1953

30 Coleman, M., "A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring" 60 : 283-284, 1975

31 신동광, "2015 영어과 교육과정 기본 어휘 분석 프로그램"

32 신동광, "2009 영어과 교육과정 기본 어휘 분석 프로그램"