보조사 ‘도’의 기능과 해당 중국어 형태소와의 대조 = A Comparative Study of the Meaning Functions Between the Auxiliary Particle ‘-to’ and Corresponding Chinese Morpheme

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to make a comparative analysis between Korean auxiliary particle ‘-to’ and corresponding Chinese morpheme in the frame of KFL. Auxiliary particle ‘-to’ indicates ‘similarity’, which is its basic meaning and defines relation between its pre-element and presupposed element in the discourse context. The function of ‘-to’ is not grammatical but semantic. So its use in an utterance can not be decided by syntactic information but by discourse context. The presence of ‘-to’ in an appropriate position makes discourse coherent and logical whereas the wrong use of ‘-to’ renders discourse incoherent and illogical. In order to find out corresponding morpheme that plays the same role in Chinese, the main function of auxiliary particle ‘-to’ was subdivided in five categories according to semantic status of its pre-element:similarity, polarity item, whole affirmation and whole negation, minimum quantifier and enumeration, and corresponding Chinese morphemes are matched to each function. Comparative analyses showed that except certain enumeration case auxiliary ‘-to’ corresponds to Chinese adverb ‘也’ in most cases. In the case of enumeration, according to syntactic and semantic constrain of sentence, adverb ‘又’ can assume functions of ‘-to’.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "한국어의 조사" 방송통신대학교 출판부 177-214, 2005

2 "한국어 학습자의 조사 사용에 나타난 오류 분석" 1999

3 "한국어 문법" 서울대학교 출판부 2005

4 "한국어 격조사와 특수 조사의 지위와 그 의미" (23) : 47-78, 1998

5 "중국인의 한국어 학습에 나타난 조사 오류 분석" 2005

6 "중국어의 부정극어 연구－‘비한정 성분+也’를 중심으로" 2005

7 "보조사 {도}에 대한 연구" 1992

8 "보조사 -도의 기능" 7-21, 1985

9 "반복 표시의 부사 연구" 199019-39쪽

10 "現代汉语词典(第 5版)" 2005