RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    탐사저널리즘의 속성의제설정 = KBS〈추적 60분〉‘KT&G를 아십니까’ 현장실험 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76365955

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the present study is to uncover the effects of a TV investigative report, single episode〈Do You Know the KT&G?〉of the KBS’s 60 minutes, informing potential hazard of cigarette smoking and the unethical marketing strategies of cigarette company. Based on the field experiment with the pretest-posttest control group design, the authors have found that the TV investigative report had exerted salient influences on the audiences. The study found the investigative report had succeeded in telling people how to think about the second-hand smoking as well as the first-hand smoking in a way that both are harmful for public health and had shaped the negative attitude toward the tobacco company, KT&G. Also it was found that the investigative report had drawn the audience’s opinion change toward the one supporting the strong government policy on smoking which includes emphasizing cigarette packaging warning messages. The theoretical implications of the study are discussed with regard to both the research findings showing the attribute agenda-setting role of the TV investigative report and the methodological advancement, which the study brought up, utilizing the field experimental method.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the present study is to uncover the effects of a TV investigative report, single episode〈Do You Know the KT&G?〉of the KBS’s 60 minutes, informing potential hazard of cigarette smoking and the unethical marketing strategies of ciga...

    The purpose of the present study is to uncover the effects of a TV investigative report, single episode〈Do You Know the KT&G?〉of the KBS’s 60 minutes, informing potential hazard of cigarette smoking and the unethical marketing strategies of cigarette company. Based on the field experiment with the pretest-posttest control group design, the authors have found that the TV investigative report had exerted salient influences on the audiences. The study found the investigative report had succeeded in telling people how to think about the second-hand smoking as well as the first-hand smoking in a way that both are harmful for public health and had shaped the negative attitude toward the tobacco company, KT&G. Also it was found that the investigative report had drawn the audience’s opinion change toward the one supporting the strong government policy on smoking which includes emphasizing cigarette packaging warning messages. The theoretical implications of the study are discussed with regard to both the research findings showing the attribute agenda-setting role of the TV investigative report and the methodological advancement, which the study brought up, utilizing the field experimental method.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박재영, "황우석 사건의 교훈: 기자들은 무엇을 배웠으며 과학보도는 어떻게 변했다고 인식하는가?" 한국언론학회 52 (52): 226-253, 2008

    2 김민하, "한국 언론의 탐사보도와 시민공동체 형성의 전망 : 한국기자협회 <이달의 기자상> 수상작의 공공저널리즘적 기능과 한계" 한국언론학회 52 (52): 105-128, 2008

    3 반현, "선거후보자의 이미지 특성에 관한 연구: 2차 의제설정 이론을 중심으로" 한국언론학회 48 (48): 175-197, 2004

    4 심재철, "국민의제 형성에서 탐사보도의 역할: 박종철 사건을 중심으로" 43 (43): 73-109, 1999

    5 이완수, "‘무엇’에서 ‘언제’로 : 벡터자기회귀모형을 통한 경제현실, 경제보도, 경제인식 간상호영향의 시간차 탐구" 한국언론학회 52 (52): 320-345, 2008

    6 Spark, D, "nvestigative reporting: A study in technique" Focal Press 1999

    7 Fombrun, C, "What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy" 33 (33): 233-258, 1990

    8 Protess, D. L, "Uncovering rape: The watchdog press and the limits of agenda setting" 49 (49): 19-37, 1985

    9 Stone, G. C, "Tracing the time-lag in agenda-setting" 58 (58): 51-55, 1981

    10 Wanta, W, "Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of 5news media" 6 (6): 225-240, 1994

    1 박재영, "황우석 사건의 교훈: 기자들은 무엇을 배웠으며 과학보도는 어떻게 변했다고 인식하는가?" 한국언론학회 52 (52): 226-253, 2008

    2 김민하, "한국 언론의 탐사보도와 시민공동체 형성의 전망 : 한국기자협회 <이달의 기자상> 수상작의 공공저널리즘적 기능과 한계" 한국언론학회 52 (52): 105-128, 2008

    3 반현, "선거후보자의 이미지 특성에 관한 연구: 2차 의제설정 이론을 중심으로" 한국언론학회 48 (48): 175-197, 2004

    4 심재철, "국민의제 형성에서 탐사보도의 역할: 박종철 사건을 중심으로" 43 (43): 73-109, 1999

    5 이완수, "‘무엇’에서 ‘언제’로 : 벡터자기회귀모형을 통한 경제현실, 경제보도, 경제인식 간상호영향의 시간차 탐구" 한국언론학회 52 (52): 320-345, 2008

    6 Spark, D, "nvestigative reporting: A study in technique" Focal Press 1999

    7 Fombrun, C, "What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy" 33 (33): 233-258, 1990

    8 Protess, D. L, "Uncovering rape: The watchdog press and the limits of agenda setting" 49 (49): 19-37, 1985

    9 Stone, G. C, "Tracing the time-lag in agenda-setting" 58 (58): 51-55, 1981

    10 Wanta, W, "Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of 5news media" 6 (6): 225-240, 1994

    11 Zucker, H. G, "The variable nature of news media influence" Transaction Books 225-240, 1978

    12 Ehrlich, M, "The journalism of outrageousness: Tabloid television news vs. investigative news" 155 : 1-20, 1996

    13 Protess, D. L, "The impact of investigative reporting on public opinion and policy making: Targeting toxic waste" 51 (51): 166-185, 1987

    14 Protess, D. L, "The Journalism of outrage: Investigative reporting and agenda building in America" Guilford Press 1991

    15 Thorson, E, "Synergy effects of public service multi-media campaigns: A case of civic journalism in American reginonal media" 21-48, 2005

    16 McCombs, M. E, "Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion" Polity 2004

    17 McCombs, M. E, "Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election" 50 (50): 77-92, 2000

    18 김연식, "PD저널리즘의 기원과 발전에 관한 연구" 한국지역언론학회 8 (8): 149-176, 2008

    19 김연식, "PD저널리즘에 대한 인식과 제작관행" 한국언론학회 35-40, 2005

    20 Deephouse, D. L, "Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories" 26 (26): 1091-1112, 2000

    21 Gahnem, S, "Media coverage of crime and public opinion: An exploration of the second level agenda setting" The University of Texas-Austin 1996

    22 Cook, F. L, "Media and agenda setting: Effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy" 47 (47): 16-35, 1983

    23 Weaver, D. H, "Media agenda-setting in a Presidential election: Issues, images, and interest" Praeger 1981

    24 Gaines, W. C, "Investigative reporting for print and broadcast" Wadsworth/Thomson Learning 1998

    25 Ekstrom, M, "Information, storytelling, and attractions: TV journalism in three modes of communication" 22 : 465-492, 2000

    26 Gahnem, S, "Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 3-14, 1997

    27 Shadish, W. R, "Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference" Houghton Mifflin 2002

    28 Ettema, J. S, "Custodians of conscience: Investigative journalism and public virtue" Columbia University Press 1998

    29 Leff, D. R, "Crusading journalism: Changing public attitudes and policy making agendas" 50 (50): 300-315, 1986

    30 Kiousis, S, "Compelling arguments and attitude strength: Exploring the impact of second-level agenda setting on public opinion of presidential candidate image" 10 (10): 3-27, 2005

    31 Weaver, D. H, "Audience need for orientation and media effects" 7 (7): 361-376, 1980

    32 Feldstein, M, "A muckraking model: Investigative reporting cycles in American history" 11 (11): 105-120, 2006

    33 Harris, R. J, "A cognitive theory of mass communication" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.75 1.75 1.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.07 2.11 2.773 0.4
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼