RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      새로운 통합은 옛 뿌리 위에서만 자랄 수 있다  :  엘리어트의 (반)모더니티 의식 T. S. Eliot on Modernity = A New Unity Can Only Grow on the Old Roots

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40022708

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Eliot betrays an impasse in which he was situated at once as a child of decentred modernity and as a self-imposed reactionary to it. While unconsciously residing in 'eccentric and formless' modernity, he made a conscious attempt to transcend it. He wandered between Eliot the poet and Eliot the critic or more precisely between aesthetic modernity and the glorifying submission of transient modernity to the imagined pre-modern centrality. His critical project begins with a strong desire to nullify historical discontinuities under ever- deepening modernity. He goes against all the modern trends, determined to apply what he thinks is permanent, complete and fundamental to the particular, the fragmentary and the provincial under modernity. For this reason, he repeatedly looks back to the disintegration of the intellect and the dissociation of sensibility in the course of modernity for what he suspects is the origin of modern rupture, attempting to bridge historical faultlines running through between the two worlds. Likewise. the self-claimed anti-modern Eliot, who is ironically faithful to modernity's dialectical impulse to deny the past, is explicit in putting forward various kinds of oppositional pairs suggesting his conceptual map of pre-modern absolutes and modern contingencies: centre and periphery, the timeless and the temporal, the eternal and flux, the enduring and the changing, Christiandom and the Civil War. Dante and Donne. universal verse and superficial prose, the visual and the auditory imagination, ontologism and psychologism, religious orthodoxy and secular humanism, outside authority and inner voice, tradition and the individual talent, etc. These binary oppositions make it clear that Eliot, reducing modern emergencies just to the empirical and experimental, attempts to reformulate the relationship of contemporary modernity to the past tradition in the hope to reactivate the former group in each pair with a sweeping dismissal of the latter in his anachronistically dualistic world-view. Even if the age is to be edged forward beyond modernity or at least into another stage of modernity, Eliot sees no point in going forward, in which vision the pre-modern integrity is the only alternative for modernity and other possibilities are also nothing but modernity's impulse for another experimentalism towards an uncertain future.
      번역하기

      Eliot betrays an impasse in which he was situated at once as a child of decentred modernity and as a self-imposed reactionary to it. While unconsciously residing in 'eccentric and formless' modernity, he made a conscious attempt to transcend it. He wa...

      Eliot betrays an impasse in which he was situated at once as a child of decentred modernity and as a self-imposed reactionary to it. While unconsciously residing in 'eccentric and formless' modernity, he made a conscious attempt to transcend it. He wandered between Eliot the poet and Eliot the critic or more precisely between aesthetic modernity and the glorifying submission of transient modernity to the imagined pre-modern centrality. His critical project begins with a strong desire to nullify historical discontinuities under ever- deepening modernity. He goes against all the modern trends, determined to apply what he thinks is permanent, complete and fundamental to the particular, the fragmentary and the provincial under modernity. For this reason, he repeatedly looks back to the disintegration of the intellect and the dissociation of sensibility in the course of modernity for what he suspects is the origin of modern rupture, attempting to bridge historical faultlines running through between the two worlds. Likewise. the self-claimed anti-modern Eliot, who is ironically faithful to modernity's dialectical impulse to deny the past, is explicit in putting forward various kinds of oppositional pairs suggesting his conceptual map of pre-modern absolutes and modern contingencies: centre and periphery, the timeless and the temporal, the eternal and flux, the enduring and the changing, Christiandom and the Civil War. Dante and Donne. universal verse and superficial prose, the visual and the auditory imagination, ontologism and psychologism, religious orthodoxy and secular humanism, outside authority and inner voice, tradition and the individual talent, etc. These binary oppositions make it clear that Eliot, reducing modern emergencies just to the empirical and experimental, attempts to reformulate the relationship of contemporary modernity to the past tradition in the hope to reactivate the former group in each pair with a sweeping dismissal of the latter in his anachronistically dualistic world-view. Even if the age is to be edged forward beyond modernity or at least into another stage of modernity, Eliot sees no point in going forward, in which vision the pre-modern integrity is the only alternative for modernity and other possibilities are also nothing but modernity's impulse for another experimentalism towards an uncertain future.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼