RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The study of fractural behavior of repaired composite = 수리된 복합 레진 수복물의 파괴 거동에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82491469

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives: This study evaluated microtensile bond strength () and short-rod fracture toughness to explain fractural behavior of repaired composite restorations according to different surface treatments.
      Materials and Methods: Thirty composite blocks for test and sixty short-rod specimens for fracture toughness test were fabricated and were allocated to 3 groups according to the combination of surface treatment (none-treated, sand blasting, bur roughening). Each group was repaired immediately and 2 weeks later. Twenty-four hours later from repair, and fracture toughness test were conducted. Mean values analyzed with two-way ANOVA / Tukey's B test (= 0.05) and correlation analysis was done between and fracture toughness. FE-SEM was employed on fractured surface to examine the crack propagation.
      Results: The fresh composite resin showed higher than the aged composite resin (p < 0.001). Mechanically treated groups showed higher bond strength than non-mechanically treated groups except none-treated fresh group in (p < 0.05). The fracture toughness value of mechanically treated surface was higher than that of non-mechanically treated surface (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between fracture toughness and microtensile bond strength values. Specimens having high KIC showed toughening mechanism including crack deviation, microcracks and crack bridging in FE-SEM.
      Conclusions: Surface treatment by mechanical interlock is more important for effective composite repair, and the fracture toughness test could be used as an appropriate tool to examine the fractural behavior of the repaired composite with microtensile bond strength.
      번역하기

      Objectives: This study evaluated microtensile bond strength () and short-rod fracture toughness to explain fractural behavior of repaired composite restorations according to different surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Thirty composite block...

      Objectives: This study evaluated microtensile bond strength () and short-rod fracture toughness to explain fractural behavior of repaired composite restorations according to different surface treatments.
      Materials and Methods: Thirty composite blocks for test and sixty short-rod specimens for fracture toughness test were fabricated and were allocated to 3 groups according to the combination of surface treatment (none-treated, sand blasting, bur roughening). Each group was repaired immediately and 2 weeks later. Twenty-four hours later from repair, and fracture toughness test were conducted. Mean values analyzed with two-way ANOVA / Tukey's B test (= 0.05) and correlation analysis was done between and fracture toughness. FE-SEM was employed on fractured surface to examine the crack propagation.
      Results: The fresh composite resin showed higher than the aged composite resin (p < 0.001). Mechanically treated groups showed higher bond strength than non-mechanically treated groups except none-treated fresh group in (p < 0.05). The fracture toughness value of mechanically treated surface was higher than that of non-mechanically treated surface (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between fracture toughness and microtensile bond strength values. Specimens having high KIC showed toughening mechanism including crack deviation, microcracks and crack bridging in FE-SEM.
      Conclusions: Surface treatment by mechanical interlock is more important for effective composite repair, and the fracture toughness test could be used as an appropriate tool to examine the fractural behavior of the repaired composite with microtensile bond strength.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      연구목적: 본 연구는 미세인장결합강도와 파괴인성을 통해 복합 레진 수복물의 수리 시기와 표면 처리 방법에 따른 파괴 거동을 알아보고자 시행되었다.
      연구 재료 및 방법: Short rod 시편과 composite resin specimen block을 준비하여 표면 처리 방법에 따라 none-treated, sand blasting, bur roughening 군으로 나누고 이를 다시 즉시군과 2주 지연군으로 나누어 수리했다.
      결과: 미세인장결합강도와 파괴인성을 측정한 결과, 두 실험 모두에서 즉시군이 지연군보다 높은 값을 보였다. 기계적 표면 처리군이 none-treated군보다 높은 값을 보였고, sand blasting과 bur roughening 사이에 유의한 차이는 없었다. 파괴인성과 미세인장결합강도는 상관 관계가 없었다. FE-SEM을 보아 수복물의 탈락은 균열 전도와 관계가 있는 것으로 보인다.
      결론: 수리된 복합 레진의 파괴 거동 평가에는 파괴인성 실험이 적합하다.
      번역하기

      연구목적: 본 연구는 미세인장결합강도와 파괴인성을 통해 복합 레진 수복물의 수리 시기와 표면 처리 방법에 따른 파괴 거동을 알아보고자 시행되었다. 연구 재료 및 방법: Short rod 시편과...

      연구목적: 본 연구는 미세인장결합강도와 파괴인성을 통해 복합 레진 수복물의 수리 시기와 표면 처리 방법에 따른 파괴 거동을 알아보고자 시행되었다.
      연구 재료 및 방법: Short rod 시편과 composite resin specimen block을 준비하여 표면 처리 방법에 따라 none-treated, sand blasting, bur roughening 군으로 나누고 이를 다시 즉시군과 2주 지연군으로 나누어 수리했다.
      결과: 미세인장결합강도와 파괴인성을 측정한 결과, 두 실험 모두에서 즉시군이 지연군보다 높은 값을 보였다. 기계적 표면 처리군이 none-treated군보다 높은 값을 보였고, sand blasting과 bur roughening 사이에 유의한 차이는 없었다. 파괴인성과 미세인장결합강도는 상관 관계가 없었다. FE-SEM을 보아 수복물의 탈락은 균열 전도와 관계가 있는 것으로 보인다.
      결론: 수리된 복합 레진의 파괴 거동 평가에는 파괴인성 실험이 적합하다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최수영, "수리된 복합레진 수복물의 전단결합강도 연구" 대한치과보존학회 27 (27): 569-576, 2002

      2 류길주, "상아질-복합레진 접착계면의 파괴거동에 대한 연구" 대한치과보존학회 32 (32): 208-221, 2007

      3 이연신, "기질레진의 조성에 따른 복합레진의 물리적 성질에 관한 연구" 대한치과보존학회 27 (27): 77-86, 2002

      4 Dhuru VB, "The fracture toughness of repaired composite" 13 (13): 413-421, 1986

      5 Lovell LG, "The effects of light intensity, temperature, and comonomer composition on the polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins" 78 (78): 1469-1476, 1999

      6 Cesar PF, "Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments" 14 (14): 373-377, 2001

      7 Sturdevant CM, "Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed" 201-203, 2006

      8 Ferracane JL, "Solvent degradation and reduced fracture toughness in aged composites" 71 (71): 13-19, 1992

      9 Teixeira EC BS, "Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites" 7 (7): 159-164, 2005

      10 Soderholm KJ, "Review of the fracture toughness approach" 26 (26): 63-77, 2010

      1 최수영, "수리된 복합레진 수복물의 전단결합강도 연구" 대한치과보존학회 27 (27): 569-576, 2002

      2 류길주, "상아질-복합레진 접착계면의 파괴거동에 대한 연구" 대한치과보존학회 32 (32): 208-221, 2007

      3 이연신, "기질레진의 조성에 따른 복합레진의 물리적 성질에 관한 연구" 대한치과보존학회 27 (27): 77-86, 2002

      4 Dhuru VB, "The fracture toughness of repaired composite" 13 (13): 413-421, 1986

      5 Lovell LG, "The effects of light intensity, temperature, and comonomer composition on the polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins" 78 (78): 1469-1476, 1999

      6 Cesar PF, "Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments" 14 (14): 373-377, 2001

      7 Sturdevant CM, "Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed" 201-203, 2006

      8 Ferracane JL, "Solvent degradation and reduced fracture toughness in aged composites" 71 (71): 13-19, 1992

      9 Teixeira EC BS, "Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites" 7 (7): 159-164, 2005

      10 Soderholm KJ, "Review of the fracture toughness approach" 26 (26): 63-77, 2010

      11 Craig RG, "Restorative Dental Materials 11th" Mosby 2002

      12 Ye Q, "Relationship of solvent to the photopolymerization process, properties, and structure in model dentin adhesives" 80 (80): 342-350, 2007

      13 Santerre JP, "Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products" 12 (12): 136-151, 2001

      14 KIM SC, "Polymer Engeneering I"

      15 Suh BI, "Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry" 16 (16): 316-323, 2004

      16 Cavalcanti AN, "Microleakage at the Composite-repair Interface: Effect of Different Surface Treatment Methods" 30 (30): 113-117, 2005

      17 Kim KH, "Microfracture mechanisms of dental resin composites containing spherically-shaped filler particles" 73 (73): 499-504, 1994

      18 Rodrigues SA Jr, "Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials" 23 (23): 442-451, 2009

      19 Goncalves F, "Influence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and flexural strength of experimental resins and composites" 117 (117): 442-446, 2009

      20 Tam LE, "Fracture toughness ov conventional or photopolymerized glass ionomer/dentin interfaces" 20 (20): 144-150, 1995

      21 Tam LE, "Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces" 72 (72): 953-959, 1993

      22 Tam LE, "Fracture surface characterization of dentin-bonded interfacial fracture toughness specimens" 73 (73): 607-619, 1994

      23 Mecholsky JJ Jr, "Fracture mechanics principles" 11 (11): 111-112, 1995

      24 Young RJ, "Failure of brittle polymers by slow crack growth. Part 2. Failure processes in a silica particle-filled epoxy resin composite" 101 : 343-1350, 1975

      25 Bonstein T, "Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin" 7 (7): 41-49, 2005

      26 Lapcl′k L Jr JJ, "Electron paramagnetic resonance study of free-radical kinetics in ultraviolet- light cured dimethacrylate copolymers" 9 (9): 257-262, 1998

      27 Tam LE, "Effects of dentin surface treatments on the fracture toughness and tensile bond strength of a dentin-composite adhesive interface" 73 (73): 1530-1538, 1994

      28 Fawzy AS, "Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite" 36 (36): 969-976, 2008

      29 Cavalcanti AN, "Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites" 19 (19): 90-98, 2007

      30 Nalla R K, "Effect of orientation on the in vitro fracture toughness of dentin: the role of toughening mechanisms" 24 (24): 3955-3968, 2003

      31 Brosh T, "Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites" 77 (77): 122-126, 1997

      32 Miyazaki M, "Determination of residual double bonds in resin-dentin interface by Raman spectroscopy" 19 (19): 245-251, 2003

      33 Filho JD, "Degree of conversion and plasticization of dimethacrylate-based polymeric matrices: influence of light-curing mode" 50 (50): 315-321, 2008

      34 Eick JD, "Current concepts on adhesion to dentin" 8 (8): 306-335, 1997

      35 Kruzic JJ, "Crack blunting, crack bridging and resistance-curve fracture mechanics in dentin: effect of hydration" 24 (24): 5209-5221, 2003

      36 Ruyter IE, "Composites for use in posterior teeth: composition and conversion" 21 (21): 11-23, 1987

      37 Papacchini F, "Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition" 9 (9): 25-31, 2007

      38 Tezvergil A, "Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers" 31 (31): 521-525, 2003

      39 Passos SP, "Bond strength durability of direct and indirect composite systems following surface conditioning for repair" 9 (9): 443-447, 2007

      40 Barker LM, "A simplified methods for measuring plane strain fracture toughness" 9 : 361-369, 1977

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.25 0.25 0.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.21 0.19 0.448 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼