RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    물 수요관리 평가

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76502332

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to provide a evaluation framework for national water demand management. Water demand management is one of the top issues to secure clean water stably. Water demand management policy have been propelled to solve water shortage. With this background, evaluation framework of water demand management should be built and try to evaluate each water saving method. Based on this case study, evaluation items and procedures are suggested.
    Effective evaluating procedure in the context of the water demand management methods is built with five criteria.
    First, technical evaluation basically measures the saving water amount using water saving instruments. Toilet, shower head, bathroom and kitchen faucet, leak water ratio are belong to this category. The effectiveness for water saving instruments can be measured to compare the amount of water use with water saving devices with water use amount of users without water saving devices.
    Second, the object of economic evaluation among the water demand management methods is water rate. The effect of water rate raise can be measured by the amount of water use reduction using price elasticity. Here, the Stone-Geary demand function is used to attain these objects. The Stone-Geary specification also provides an estimate of the portion of water use that may not be responsive to price, and is useful in analysing price structures and designing conservation policies.
    Third, Financial evaluation was carried out for the replacement of obsolete water pipes. The basic direction of evaluation is to decide the appropriateness of the investment of obsolete water pipes with respect to the financial self-supporting degree and the size of population.
    Fourth, social & environmental evaluation was carried by surveys to public officials in waterworks field and citizen. The effectiveness of water rate, attitude, water saving devices etc. are evaluated on the level of water supplier and users.
    Fifth, legal & institutional evaluation was carried out the appropriateness of water rate design, the degree of legal enforcement, the efficiency of water supply system.
    This study provides the theoretical basis for water demand management evaluation and we expect that it will contribute the rational comprehensive national water plan through the readjustment of aim of water demand management by the evaluation of water demand management.
    번역하기

    This study aims to provide a evaluation framework for national water demand management. Water demand management is one of the top issues to secure clean water stably. Water demand management policy have been propelled to solve water shortage. With thi...

    This study aims to provide a evaluation framework for national water demand management. Water demand management is one of the top issues to secure clean water stably. Water demand management policy have been propelled to solve water shortage. With this background, evaluation framework of water demand management should be built and try to evaluate each water saving method. Based on this case study, evaluation items and procedures are suggested.
    Effective evaluating procedure in the context of the water demand management methods is built with five criteria.
    First, technical evaluation basically measures the saving water amount using water saving instruments. Toilet, shower head, bathroom and kitchen faucet, leak water ratio are belong to this category. The effectiveness for water saving instruments can be measured to compare the amount of water use with water saving devices with water use amount of users without water saving devices.
    Second, the object of economic evaluation among the water demand management methods is water rate. The effect of water rate raise can be measured by the amount of water use reduction using price elasticity. Here, the Stone-Geary demand function is used to attain these objects. The Stone-Geary specification also provides an estimate of the portion of water use that may not be responsive to price, and is useful in analysing price structures and designing conservation policies.
    Third, Financial evaluation was carried out for the replacement of obsolete water pipes. The basic direction of evaluation is to decide the appropriateness of the investment of obsolete water pipes with respect to the financial self-supporting degree and the size of population.
    Fourth, social & environmental evaluation was carried by surveys to public officials in waterworks field and citizen. The effectiveness of water rate, attitude, water saving devices etc. are evaluated on the level of water supplier and users.
    Fifth, legal & institutional evaluation was carried out the appropriateness of water rate design, the degree of legal enforcement, the efficiency of water supply system.
    This study provides the theoretical basis for water demand management evaluation and we expect that it will contribute the rational comprehensive national water plan through the readjustment of aim of water demand management by the evaluation of water demand management.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 도입부
    • Ⅱ. 물 수요관리 평가 현황과 문제점
    • Ⅲ. 평가의 틀의 설정
    • Ⅳ. 평가기준별 사례분석 결과
    • Ⅴ. 물 수요관리 평가방법의 제안
    • Ⅰ. 도입부
    • Ⅱ. 물 수요관리 평가 현황과 문제점
    • Ⅲ. 평가의 틀의 설정
    • Ⅳ. 평가기준별 사례분석 결과
    • Ⅴ. 물 수요관리 평가방법의 제안
    • Ⅵ. 결론
    • 【ABSTRACT】
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-05-26 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> kangwon Law Review KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.92 0.92 1
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.93 0.86 1.122 0.44
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼