RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조깅시 착지 유형과 시간에 따른 지면 반력 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100107791

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate how ground reaction force changed according to both time and striking patterns. Subjects for this study were four university students in their early twenties. Two of the women jogged with a heel-strike pattern, while the other two jogged with a toe-strike pattern. Independent variables for this study were jogging time and striking pattern. Jogging time was divided into six stages over the duration of one hour. Striking patterns were divided into two types: heel-strike, and toe-strike. Dependent variables were consisted of impact force and active force in both vertical and anterior / posterior planes. The categories for these forces were: loading rate of impact force, loading rate of active force, number of impact peaks, contact time (vertical ground reaction force only), impulse, peak values, braking time and propulsive time, interval time between first heel (or toe) strike to first passive peak, and interval time between first heel (or toe) strike and first active peak. This study utilized the Kistler type 9281B Force Platform to measure dependent variables.Toe-strikers showed more efficient jogging patterns. They experienced significantly less impact force than heel strikers, and they were able to generate more impulse in a shorter time period. For toe-strikers, some of these results quickly deteriorated after thirty minutes. However, their levels were still below that of heel strikers despite decreased efficiency.Toe-strikers and heel-strikers did not show the effects of active force fatigue even after one hour. In the future, if researchers wish to understand the effects of fatigue, the test duration should be longer than one hour.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate how ground reaction force changed according to both time and striking patterns. Subjects for this study were four university students in their early twenties. Two of the women jogged with a heel-strike pattern...

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate how ground reaction force changed according to both time and striking patterns. Subjects for this study were four university students in their early twenties. Two of the women jogged with a heel-strike pattern, while the other two jogged with a toe-strike pattern. Independent variables for this study were jogging time and striking pattern. Jogging time was divided into six stages over the duration of one hour. Striking patterns were divided into two types: heel-strike, and toe-strike. Dependent variables were consisted of impact force and active force in both vertical and anterior / posterior planes. The categories for these forces were: loading rate of impact force, loading rate of active force, number of impact peaks, contact time (vertical ground reaction force only), impulse, peak values, braking time and propulsive time, interval time between first heel (or toe) strike to first passive peak, and interval time between first heel (or toe) strike and first active peak. This study utilized the Kistler type 9281B Force Platform to measure dependent variables.Toe-strikers showed more efficient jogging patterns. They experienced significantly less impact force than heel strikers, and they were able to generate more impulse in a shorter time period. For toe-strikers, some of these results quickly deteriorated after thirty minutes. However, their levels were still below that of heel strikers despite decreased efficiency.Toe-strikers and heel-strikers did not show the effects of active force fatigue even after one hour. In the future, if researchers wish to understand the effects of fatigue, the test duration should be longer than one hour.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "격의 수도 적어 더 바람직한 착지 유형이라는 결론을 내리게 되었다 그러나 조깅 시간 60분에는 힘 부하율 역적이 감소하지 않아 조깅시 피로의 역학적 분석을 위해서는 60분 이상 실험시간을 갖는 것이 필요하다"

    2 "University of Calgary" 11-23,

    3 "Response of joints to impact loading relationship between trabecullar microfractures and cartilage degeneration Journal of Biomechanic" 51-57, 1973

    4 "Jogging시 발의 착지 유형에 따른 지면반력의 변화" 1993

    5 "Ground reaction forces in running Journal of Biomechanic" 147-155, 1987

    6 "Ground reaction forces in distance running Journal of Biomechanic" 397-406, 1980

    7 "External force measurements with sports shoes and playing surfaces In Biomechanical Aspects of Sports Shoes and" 1983

    8 "Effect of prolonged walking on concrete on the joint of sheep" 1980

    9 "Biomechanical aspects of running In Biomechanics of Runnig Shoes" 1986

    1 "격의 수도 적어 더 바람직한 착지 유형이라는 결론을 내리게 되었다 그러나 조깅 시간 60분에는 힘 부하율 역적이 감소하지 않아 조깅시 피로의 역학적 분석을 위해서는 60분 이상 실험시간을 갖는 것이 필요하다"

    2 "University of Calgary" 11-23,

    3 "Response of joints to impact loading relationship between trabecullar microfractures and cartilage degeneration Journal of Biomechanic" 51-57, 1973

    4 "Jogging시 발의 착지 유형에 따른 지면반력의 변화" 1993

    5 "Ground reaction forces in running Journal of Biomechanic" 147-155, 1987

    6 "Ground reaction forces in distance running Journal of Biomechanic" 397-406, 1980

    7 "External force measurements with sports shoes and playing surfaces In Biomechanical Aspects of Sports Shoes and" 1983

    8 "Effect of prolonged walking on concrete on the joint of sheep" 1980

    9 "Biomechanical aspects of running In Biomechanics of Runnig Shoes" 1986

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.03 1.03 1
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.98 0.895 0.19
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼