사물인터넷 표준화의 상대적 중요도 결정을 위한 계층분석방법 응용 = Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Relative Importance Determination of Internet of Things Standardization

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As one of recent issues in the information and communication industry, internet of things has attracted attention to provide intelligent infrastructure services which connect and share data and information between real and virtual world. According to the development of these internet of things technologies, types of machines, telecommunication devices, and terminals are increasing tremendously. In this situation, connectivity and interoperability between internet of things components are important issues to build a hyper connected society. To visualize this society, it is important to set up and develop information and communication technology (ICT) standards among stakeholders. However, under limited budget and human resources, it is essential to rank standardization work items for setting standards with respect to efficiency. The purpose of this study is to provide a method for setting standardization strategies within group decision making. As a multi-criteria group decision making tool, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is adopted and applied to determine the priorities of setting work items. The proposed method first defines decision making problem with objective, criteria, and alternatives which produces a hierarchy consisting of upper and lower criteria. Then, pairwise comparisons of academy and public sector experts are performed with respect to their relative meaning and importance.
Individual surveys of expert groups are collected and summarized to determine relative criteria importance measures. Furthermore, to deliver reliable importance criteria measures, differences between academy and public sector expert groups are compared and tested using Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. The results are illustrated for useful guidelines to practical group decision making in standardization strategy establishments.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신영진, "공공분야 개인정보보호 정책 집행과제의 우선순위 분석: 개인정보보호 수준진단 지표의 선정 및 중요도를 중심으로" 한국정보보호학회 22 (22): 379-390, 2012

2 우훈식, "계층분석방법을 이용한 IPv6 멀티네트워킹 표준화항목 우선순위 결정" 한국산업경영시스템학회 34 (34): 25-32, 2011

3 Saaty, T.L., "Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network : Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks" RWS Publication 2005

4 Park, K., "The Method of Setting Priorities for Telecommunications Standardization Work Areas-An Analysis of Pilot Test" 11 (11): 129-151, 1994

5 Swapnadeepp, N., "The Internet of Things(IoT Technology Development Trend)" 15 (15): 2015

6 Steenge, A., "The Decentralization of a Sales Support Department in a Medium-Large Company : A Quantitative Assessment Based on Ideas of Thomas L. Saaty and Stafford Beer" 48 (48): 120-127, 1990

7 Weiser, M., "The Computer for the Twenty-First Century" 265 (265): 94-104, 1991

8 Saaty, R. W., "The Analytic Hierarchy Process-What It Is and It Is Used" 9 (9): 161-176, 1987

9 Belton, V., "Remarks on the Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Judgmental Forecasting" 12 (12): 155-161, 1996

10 Saaty, T. L., "Relative Measurement and its Generalization in Decision Making : Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors-The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process" 102 (102): 251-318, 2008

11 Satty, T. L., "Pittsburgh" RWS Publication 1982

12 Mann, H., "On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variable is Stochastically Larger Than the Other" 18 : 50-60, 1949

13 Xu, Z., "On Consistency of the Weighted Geometric Mean Complex Judgement Matric in AHP" 126 : 683-687, 2000

14 Gibbons, J., "Non Parametric Statistical Inference" Chapman and Hill/CRC 2010

15 Kim, B., "Machine To Machine Promotion Policy Direction" (134) : 34-41, 2011

16 Kim, H., "Machine To Machine" (134) : 24-29, 2011

17 Institute for Information and Communication Technology Promotion, "IoT Status and Key Issues"

18 Min, K., "Internet of Things, Net Term" Korea Internet and Security Agency 2012

19 Telecommunications Technology Association, "ICT Standardization Strategy Mapp, Ver. 2016"

20 Saaty, T. L., "How To Make a Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process" 48 (48): 9-26, 1990

21 Dyer, R., "Group Decision Support with the Analytical Hierarchy Process" 8 : 99-124, 1992

22 Parthasarathy, S., "Determining ERP Customization Choices Using Nominal Group" 65 : 1009-1017, 2014

23 Peniwati, K., "Criteria for Evaluating Group Decision-Making Methods" 46 : 935-947, 2007

24 Palma-Mendoza, J., "Analytical Hierarchy Process and SCOR Model to Support Supply Chain Re-design" 34 : 634-638, 2014

25 서준혁, "AHP기법을 활용한 제조물책임 대응시스템 구축요인의 전략적 우선순위 도출에 관한 연구" 한국품질경영학회 42 (42): 235-252, 2014

26 Hamalainen, R. P., "A Decision Aid in the Public Debate on Nuclear Power" 48 (48): 66-76, 1990