RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      A Composite Centrality: Interpreting Centrality within Zhu Xi’s Zhongyong

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Considered to be one of the most central concepts within the Zhongyong 中庸, the notion of the “Mean” or “centrality” (zhong 中) occupies a key position within Zhu Xi’s psychological and ethical thought. The term occurs several times in the opening lines of the work, presented alternately as part of the semantic compounds zhonghe 中和 and shizhong 時中. Despite the distinct differences between the two instances of zhong as they functioned within Zhu Xi’s reading of the text, recent approaches have failed to provide a complete account of their relation, thereby hindering a full understanding of the role of centrality within Zhu Xi’s psychological thought. It is the aim of the current paper to elaborate upon and address this issue. In the first section, I examine Zhu Xi’s reading of the phrase shizhong, providing evidence to support Daniel Gardner’s recent suggestion that Zhu interpreted this instance of zhong as an explicitly situational balancing of one’s emotional state. In the second section, I address the relationship between zhong and he, demonstrating that Zhu instead framed this instance of zhong as a primarily hypothetical ideal informed by one’s inborn nature (xing 性), existing only prior to actual concrete practice. In the third section, I argue that Zhu Xi maintained a strong thematic and perspectival boundary between the two instances of zhong, in contrast with recent interpretations of the term. While zhonghe was adopted to describe the hypothetical initial state or “substance” (ti 體) of one’s psychology in an abstract ontological sense, shizhong reflected its application or “function” (yong 用) within the concrete social world.
      번역하기

      Considered to be one of the most central concepts within the Zhongyong 中庸, the notion of the “Mean” or “centrality” (zhong 中) occupies a key position within Zhu Xi’s psychological and ethical thought. The term occurs several times in t...

      Considered to be one of the most central concepts within the Zhongyong 中庸, the notion of the “Mean” or “centrality” (zhong 中) occupies a key position within Zhu Xi’s psychological and ethical thought. The term occurs several times in the opening lines of the work, presented alternately as part of the semantic compounds zhonghe 中和 and shizhong 時中. Despite the distinct differences between the two instances of zhong as they functioned within Zhu Xi’s reading of the text, recent approaches have failed to provide a complete account of their relation, thereby hindering a full understanding of the role of centrality within Zhu Xi’s psychological thought. It is the aim of the current paper to elaborate upon and address this issue. In the first section, I examine Zhu Xi’s reading of the phrase shizhong, providing evidence to support Daniel Gardner’s recent suggestion that Zhu interpreted this instance of zhong as an explicitly situational balancing of one’s emotional state. In the second section, I address the relationship between zhong and he, demonstrating that Zhu instead framed this instance of zhong as a primarily hypothetical ideal informed by one’s inborn nature (xing 性), existing only prior to actual concrete practice. In the third section, I argue that Zhu Xi maintained a strong thematic and perspectival boundary between the two instances of zhong, in contrast with recent interpretations of the term. While zhonghe was adopted to describe the hypothetical initial state or “substance” (ti 體) of one’s psychology in an abstract ontological sense, shizhong reflected its application or “function” (yong 用) within the concrete social world.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Zhu, Xi, "Zhuzi yulei 朱子語類 (A Classified Collection of the Conversations of Master Zhu)" Zhonghua shuju 1986

      2 Qian, Mu, "Zhuzi xin xuean 朱子新學案 (Zhu Xi: New Studies). 5 vols" Sanmin shuju 1971

      3 Chen, Lai, "Zhu Xi Zhongyong zhangju ji qi ruxue sixiang 朱熹《中庸章句》及其儒學思想 (Zhu Xi’s Collected Commentaries on the Zhongyong in Chapters and Sentences and His Confucian Thought)" 56 (56): 1-11, 2007

      4 Kong, Yingda, "Zhouyi zhengyi 周易正義 (Correct Meanings of the Zhouyi)" Beijing daxue chubanshe 2000

      5 Zhang, Zai, "Zhang Zai ji 張載集 (Collected Works of Zhang Zai)" Zhonghua shuju 1978

      6 Riegel, Jeffrey K., "The Four ‘Tzu Ssu’ Chapters of the Li Chi: An analysis and Translation of the Fang Chi, Chung Yung, Piao Chi, and Tzu I" Stanford University 1978

      7 Gardner, Daniel K., "The Four Books: The Basic Teaching of the Later Confucian Tradition" Hackett 2007

      8 Legge, James., "The Chinese Classics. Vol. 1, Confucian Analects, the Great Learning, and the Doctrine of the Mean" SMC 1991

      9 Plaks, Andrew., "Ta Hsüeh and Chung Yung" Penguin Books 2003

      10 Zhu, Xi, "Sishu zhangju jizhu 四書章句集註 (Collected Commentaries on the Four Books in Chapters and Sentences)" Zhonghua shuju 1983

      1 Zhu, Xi, "Zhuzi yulei 朱子語類 (A Classified Collection of the Conversations of Master Zhu)" Zhonghua shuju 1986

      2 Qian, Mu, "Zhuzi xin xuean 朱子新學案 (Zhu Xi: New Studies). 5 vols" Sanmin shuju 1971

      3 Chen, Lai, "Zhu Xi Zhongyong zhangju ji qi ruxue sixiang 朱熹《中庸章句》及其儒學思想 (Zhu Xi’s Collected Commentaries on the Zhongyong in Chapters and Sentences and His Confucian Thought)" 56 (56): 1-11, 2007

      4 Kong, Yingda, "Zhouyi zhengyi 周易正義 (Correct Meanings of the Zhouyi)" Beijing daxue chubanshe 2000

      5 Zhang, Zai, "Zhang Zai ji 張載集 (Collected Works of Zhang Zai)" Zhonghua shuju 1978

      6 Riegel, Jeffrey K., "The Four ‘Tzu Ssu’ Chapters of the Li Chi: An analysis and Translation of the Fang Chi, Chung Yung, Piao Chi, and Tzu I" Stanford University 1978

      7 Gardner, Daniel K., "The Four Books: The Basic Teaching of the Later Confucian Tradition" Hackett 2007

      8 Legge, James., "The Chinese Classics. Vol. 1, Confucian Analects, the Great Learning, and the Doctrine of the Mean" SMC 1991

      9 Plaks, Andrew., "Ta Hsüeh and Chung Yung" Penguin Books 2003

      10 Zhu, Xi, "Sishu zhangju jizhu 四書章句集註 (Collected Commentaries on the Four Books in Chapters and Sentences)" Zhonghua shuju 1983

      11 Thompson, Kirill., "Returning to Zhu Xi: Emerging Patterns within the Supreme Polarity" State University of New York Press 149-175, 2015

      12 Cheng, Chung-ying, "New Dimensions of Confucian and Neo-Confucian Philosophy" State University of New York Press 1991

      13 Kong, Yingda, "Liji zhengyi 禮記正義 (Correct Meanings of the Liji)" Beijing daxue chubanshe 1999

      14 Zhu, Xi, "Huian xiansheng Zhu wengong wenji 晦庵先生朱文公文集 (Collected Writings of Mister Huian, Zhu Wengong)" Shanghai guji chubanshe 2002

      15 Ames, Roger T., "Focusing the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong" University of Hawaii Press 2001

      16 Cheng, Yi, "Er Cheng ji 二程集 (Collected Works of the Cheng Brothers)" Zhonghua shuju 1981

      17 Johnston, Ian, "Daxue & Zhongyong" The Chinese University Press 2012

      18 Chan, Wing-tsit., "Chu Hsi: New Studies" University of Hawaii Press 1989

      19 Ching, Julia., "Chu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism" University of Hawaii Press 273-291, 1986

      20 Lokuang, Stanislaus, "Chu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism" University of Hawaii Press 58-78, 1986

      21 Chen, Chun, "Beixi ziyi 北溪字義 (The Meaning of Words by the Master of the Northern Stream)" Zhonghua shuju 1983

      22 Chan, Wing-tsit., "A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy" Princeton University Press 1969

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-12-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 國際版<儒敎文化硏究> -> Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
      KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-06-13 학회명변경 영문명 : Institute of Confucian Cultural Studies -> Institute of Confucian Philosophy and Culture KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.06 0.04 0.351 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼