RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      知覺된 英才와 測定된 英才의 創意性 比較 = A Study on the Creativity Development of Percieved Gifted and Measured Gifted Children

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82593430

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      본 연구는 초등학교 교육현장에서 어머니들의 자녀에 대한 기대심리와 아동들이 지니고 있는 실제 수준에 대한 기초조사를 바탕으로하여 지각된 영재와 측정된 영재의 창의성 발달 정도에 대한 차이를 분석하고자 하였다. 연구 결과 창의성의 발달 정도는 어머니에 의해 지각되고 측정된 영재, 지각된 영재이면서 측정된 평재, 지각된 평재이나 측정된 영재 집단의 순으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 결과는 지적 영재의 측정된 지능보다는 어머니가 자녀를 영재로 지각하여 아동에 대한 신뢰와 동기를 강화함에 따라 창의성도 발달하고 있음을 나타내준다.
      번역하기

      본 연구는 초등학교 교육현장에서 어머니들의 자녀에 대한 기대심리와 아동들이 지니고 있는 실제 수준에 대한 기초조사를 바탕으로하여 지각된 영재와 측정된 영재의 창의성 발달 정도에 ...

      본 연구는 초등학교 교육현장에서 어머니들의 자녀에 대한 기대심리와 아동들이 지니고 있는 실제 수준에 대한 기초조사를 바탕으로하여 지각된 영재와 측정된 영재의 창의성 발달 정도에 대한 차이를 분석하고자 하였다. 연구 결과 창의성의 발달 정도는 어머니에 의해 지각되고 측정된 영재, 지각된 영재이면서 측정된 평재, 지각된 평재이나 측정된 영재 집단의 순으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 결과는 지적 영재의 측정된 지능보다는 어머니가 자녀를 영재로 지각하여 아동에 대한 신뢰와 동기를 강화함에 따라 창의성도 발달하고 있음을 나타내준다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is what parents recognize the property of a genius of their children and this analysis offers basic data for development of the talent education through the comparative analysis on the development of the creativity.
      The hypothesis to attain a purpose of above study is like this.
      First, there is probably not the difference between the creativity of a perceived and measured genius group and the creativity of the group of ordinary children.
      Second, the creativity of the group of the perceived genius or the measured ordinary children is more higher than that of perceived ordinary children and measured genius.
      Third, the creativity of the group of perceived and measured genius is probably higher than that of perceived ordinary children or measured genius.
      I have a sample survey of seventy-two among fourth grade in an elementary school as an object for this study and the instrument for study is a question sheet for mother, an intelligence test for children and a creativity test.
      This study gets the mean and the standard variation through the creativity test and the conclusion to t-verify the difference is like this.
      First, there is the difference between the creativity of the group of a perceived and measured genius and the creativity of the group of ordinary children or the perceived genius.
      Mother’s perception of a genius property about her children previews to help the development of the creativity in the light of the intelligent difference when we think the difference of the intelligence between two groups.
      Second, the creativity of the group of the perceived genius or the measured ordinary children is more higher than that of perceived ordinary children and measured genius but there is no similar difference.
      It is meaningful that the creativity of the occasion to perceive a ordinary person as a genius is 4.98 higher than that to perceive a real genius as a ordinary person.
      Third, what the creativity of the group of perceived and measured genius is 10.1 higher than that of perceived ordinary children or measured genius shows the meaningful difference between two groups.
      This conclusion shows that the creativity of development of children has a big difference according to parents’ perceived level of a genius property about their children.
      The conclusion through this analysis is like this.
      Parents’ perception of a genius property about their children serves as the development of the creativity for their children and the development of the creativity has some relations with intelligence but hasn’t absolute correlation.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is what parents recognize the property of a genius of their children and this analysis offers basic data for development of the talent education through the comparative analysis on the development of the creativity. The hy...

      The purpose of this study is what parents recognize the property of a genius of their children and this analysis offers basic data for development of the talent education through the comparative analysis on the development of the creativity.
      The hypothesis to attain a purpose of above study is like this.
      First, there is probably not the difference between the creativity of a perceived and measured genius group and the creativity of the group of ordinary children.
      Second, the creativity of the group of the perceived genius or the measured ordinary children is more higher than that of perceived ordinary children and measured genius.
      Third, the creativity of the group of perceived and measured genius is probably higher than that of perceived ordinary children or measured genius.
      I have a sample survey of seventy-two among fourth grade in an elementary school as an object for this study and the instrument for study is a question sheet for mother, an intelligence test for children and a creativity test.
      This study gets the mean and the standard variation through the creativity test and the conclusion to t-verify the difference is like this.
      First, there is the difference between the creativity of the group of a perceived and measured genius and the creativity of the group of ordinary children or the perceived genius.
      Mother’s perception of a genius property about her children previews to help the development of the creativity in the light of the intelligent difference when we think the difference of the intelligence between two groups.
      Second, the creativity of the group of the perceived genius or the measured ordinary children is more higher than that of perceived ordinary children and measured genius but there is no similar difference.
      It is meaningful that the creativity of the occasion to perceive a ordinary person as a genius is 4.98 higher than that to perceive a real genius as a ordinary person.
      Third, what the creativity of the group of perceived and measured genius is 10.1 higher than that of perceived ordinary children or measured genius shows the meaningful difference between two groups.
      This conclusion shows that the creativity of development of children has a big difference according to parents’ perceived level of a genius property about their children.
      The conclusion through this analysis is like this.
      Parents’ perception of a genius property about their children serves as the development of the creativity for their children and the development of the creativity has some relations with intelligence but hasn’t absolute correlation.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 《요약》
      • Ⅰ. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 가설
      • Ⅳ. 연구의 방법 및 절차
      • 《요약》
      • Ⅰ. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 가설
      • Ⅳ. 연구의 방법 및 절차
      • Ⅴ. 연구결과
      • Ⅵ. 논의
      • Ⅶ. 결론 및 제언
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼