RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      온라인 학교 학생들의 합법적인 주변참여에서 완전한 참여로의 과정에 관한 사례연구 = A Study of the Process by Which Online School Students Move From Legitimate Peripheral Participants to Full Participants

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959645

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      With the turn to the 21st century, online schools focusing on teaching and learning process have received a great deal of attention in terms of online learning communities. In this light, based on an ethnographic perspective, this study was designed to explore how online school students become part of an online learning community through legitimate peripheral participation in the community of practice. A qualitative research in cyberspace was conducted in an online school over four and half months. My participants were sixteen 8th grade students and four 8th grade teachers. Participant observation, interviews, and document analysis were conducted for data collection. Using an inductive analytical approach, qualitative data analysis software, NUD*IST Version 6, was employed for data analysis. The first finding of the study is that when my participants entered OVS as novices, a majority of them were worried or uncomfortable whereas some of them were excited about learning with technology at OVS. The second finding is that my participants frequently went to the OVS school system even though they did not need to do, sent their teachers emails, or made friends in order to make them comfortable in the OVS system. The third one is that while many of my participants explored the OVS school system by themselves, some of them had interactions with their family member, neighbor, or the OVS teachers. In conclusion, even though OVS is a school to which teachers, students, and administrators belong, interestingly, OVS had a weak community of practice. This finding seems to be related with OVS school system focusing on individualized learning and OVS students` expectation of the school that they do not need to have social interactions with other students. This study not only suggests that online schools need to a cyber place to facilitate students` social interactions, but raises a future research question: what should or can online schools` roles be?
      번역하기

      With the turn to the 21st century, online schools focusing on teaching and learning process have received a great deal of attention in terms of online learning communities. In this light, based on an ethnographic perspective, this study was designed t...

      With the turn to the 21st century, online schools focusing on teaching and learning process have received a great deal of attention in terms of online learning communities. In this light, based on an ethnographic perspective, this study was designed to explore how online school students become part of an online learning community through legitimate peripheral participation in the community of practice. A qualitative research in cyberspace was conducted in an online school over four and half months. My participants were sixteen 8th grade students and four 8th grade teachers. Participant observation, interviews, and document analysis were conducted for data collection. Using an inductive analytical approach, qualitative data analysis software, NUD*IST Version 6, was employed for data analysis. The first finding of the study is that when my participants entered OVS as novices, a majority of them were worried or uncomfortable whereas some of them were excited about learning with technology at OVS. The second finding is that my participants frequently went to the OVS school system even though they did not need to do, sent their teachers emails, or made friends in order to make them comfortable in the OVS system. The third one is that while many of my participants explored the OVS school system by themselves, some of them had interactions with their family member, neighbor, or the OVS teachers. In conclusion, even though OVS is a school to which teachers, students, and administrators belong, interestingly, OVS had a weak community of practice. This finding seems to be related with OVS school system focusing on individualized learning and OVS students` expectation of the school that they do not need to have social interactions with other students. This study not only suggests that online schools need to a cyber place to facilitate students` social interactions, but raises a future research question: what should or can online schools` roles be?

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Virtual schools: Trends and issues. Report commissioned by the Distance Learning Resource Network" Western Illinois University 2001October

      2 "Virtual schooling:Legislative update" 25 (25): 20-25, 2005

      3 "Virtual schooling:Going the distance -any distance - to school" 18 (18): 30-41, 1998

      4 "Virtual ethnography" SAGE Publications 2000

      5 "Travel or tourism? Educational Technology" 27-32, 1993

      6 "Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations" 2004

      7 "Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism." SAGE Publications, Inc. 2000

      8 "Thinking and learning in social context" Harvard University Press 1984

      9 "The relationship between situated cognition and anchored instruction A response to Tripp" 28-32, 1994

      10 "The interpretation of documents and material culture" SAGE Publications, Inc. 2000

      1 "Virtual schools: Trends and issues. Report commissioned by the Distance Learning Resource Network" Western Illinois University 2001October

      2 "Virtual schooling:Legislative update" 25 (25): 20-25, 2005

      3 "Virtual schooling:Going the distance -any distance - to school" 18 (18): 30-41, 1998

      4 "Virtual ethnography" SAGE Publications 2000

      5 "Travel or tourism? Educational Technology" 27-32, 1993

      6 "Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations" 2004

      7 "Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism." SAGE Publications, Inc. 2000

      8 "Thinking and learning in social context" Harvard University Press 1984

      9 "The relationship between situated cognition and anchored instruction A response to Tripp" 28-32, 1994

      10 "The interpretation of documents and material culture" SAGE Publications, Inc. 2000

      11 "The ethnography of an electronic bar" 24 (24): 270-298, 1995

      12 "The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding Essays on comparative and human development" Cambridge University Press 1990

      13 "Sketchy grades for cyber schools" 2004March

      14 "Situated cognition and the culture of learning" 32-42, 1989

      15 "Situated Learning and Classroom Instruction" 33 (33): 46-51, 1993

      16 "Situated Cognition, Vygotskian Thought and Learning from the Communities of Practice Perspective: Implications for the Design of Web-based E-Learning." 38 (38): 3-12, 2001

      17 "Rethinking observation: From method to context" SAGE Publications, Inc. 2000

      18 "Qualitative methods in research on teaching Handbook of research on teaching" Macmillan 1986

      19 "Preparing teachers for the "schools that technology built": evaluation of a program to train teachers fro virtual schooling" 37 (37): 399-409, 2005

      20 "Online learning and virtual schools" 21 (21): 29-35, 2005

      21 "Life online:Researching real experience in virtual space" AltaMira Press 1998

      22 "Life on the screen:Identity in the age of the internet" Touchstone Press 1995

      23 "Learning with technology" 91 (91): 85-88, 2002

      24 "Learning networks" MIT Press 1996

      25 "Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online." SAGE Publications 2000

      26 "How can virtual schools be a vibrant part of meeting the choice provisions of the no child left behind act?" 2004

      27 "Homesteading on the electronic frontier" 1993

      28 "From the practice to culture on Usenet." Blackwell Publishers 1995

      29 "E-learning:Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age" McGrew-Hill 2001

      30 "Do we really need an online discussion group?" Kogan Page. 2001

      31 "Distance education courses for public elementary" National Center for Education Statistics. 2005

      32 "Design Principles for Web-based Learning:Implications from Vygotskian Thought" 41 (41): 33-41, 2001

      33 "Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity" Cambridge University Press 1998

      34 "Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom." Jossey-Bass 1999

      35 "Apprenticeship in thinking" Oxford University Press 1990

      36 "An introduction to cybercultures" Routledge 2001

      37 "A new kind of school" 189 (189): 40-44, 2002

      38 "(Re)Writing the word: Methodological strategies and issues in qualitative research." 43 (43): 461-473, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼