체육철학 : 바둑이 체육 혹은 스포츠가 될 수 있는가? = Could Baduk be a Sport or Physical Education?

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of the present study is to find out whether Baduk could be included in physical education or a sport or not. To compare Baduk with a sport or physical education in a diachronic aspect, it is approached on three views, that is, normative, realistic and future oriented concepts. The following findings are obtained. First of all, a sport or physical education are involved in physical activities. In contrast, Baduk requires intellectual activities. According to this concept, it is examined closely that these couldn’t be included in same category. Second, the argument that Baduk could be a sport or physical education is based on needs for political and selfish actions. A sport or physical education and Baduk might be lose their own identity without considering academic judgment or verification of philosophical theory throughly. Lastly, mind sports (i.e. Baduk) and e-sports in cyber space should have independent fields as themselves. It’s necessary to have their own categories between a sport or physical education and others.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박치문, "한국기원‘바둑의 체육화’ 착점." 중앙일보. 2001

2 김영갑, "테크놀로지와 스포츠의 사유" 29-31., 2005

3 나영일, "탈 육체성의 스포츠. 스포츠 반문화." 도서출판 무지개사. 199.-187, 2005

4 이광구, "작년 상금랭킹을 들여다 보니." 뉴스메이커. 2005

5 조용헌, "백제출신 고수" 조선일보. 2005

6 박주한, "바둑의 스포츠 논쟁." 10 (10): 92-112, 2002

7 이상구, "바둑도 스포츠다." 대한미디어. 2003

8 양상국, "바둑과 인생철학." 43 (43): 26-27, 1995

9 정병국, "대한민국 국회 의정보고서." 2005

10 김복희, "그리스 경기관습." 대한미디어. 2002

11 佐藤臣彦, "身體敎育を哲學すゐ" 北樹出版. 2003

12 "The Olympic Charter" 101-102, 2004

13 Eric Kokish, "The IOC grand prix in lausanne." 1999

14 Franco Carraro, "Review of the Olympic programme and the recommendations on the programme of the games of the xxix Olympiad, beijing 2008." 2002

15 Mind sports must drug test too, "Pittsburgh Live." 2003

16 Eric Kokish, "Bridge is sport." 1999

17 "Bridge and the Olympic movement" 2005