공법 : 수사절차에서의 장애인의 인권 -신뢰관계자 동석을 중심으로- = Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Criminal Interrogation -Focusing on Presence of Persons with Reliable Relation-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Human rights of persons with disabilities in criminal interrogation have been improved by amendment of Criminal Procedure Act (CPA) and enactment of Antidiscrimination Act for People with Disabilities (AAD). Specifically, CPA (Art.244-5) allows persons who have reliable relationships with a suspect to sit in company with the suspect with disabilities and AAD has a similar provision (Art.26). However, there is a risk to consider these provisions contradict because they are different in forms and contents. This article studies how to minimize the contradiction and how persons with disabilities can appropriately exercise the right of presence of persons with reliable relationship in interrogation procedure. The conclusions of the article are as follows: Firstly, the provisions of assistants (CPA, Art. 29), presence of persons with reliable relationship (CPA, Art. 244-5) and assistance by guardian and other assistants (AAD, Art. 26, Para. 5) shall be appropriately applied to protect human rights of people with disabilities during interrogation. Secondly, CPA`s provision (Art. 244-5) does not reflect the right of persons with disabilities to assistance by guardian and other assistants prescribed in AAD (Art. 26, Para.5). Therefore, AAD shall be applied directly to criminal procedures for persons with disabilities. In this sense, AAD shall be construed as a special criminal procedure act before the relevant revision is made to CPA. The presidential regulation of AAD (Art. 17, Para.2), which does not allow AAD`s provision (art. para.5) to be applied to criminal procedure, should be ineffective for violation of mandate`s limitation. Thirdly, investigation agencies shall notify before interrogating suspects with disabilitiesof the right of presence of persons with reliable relationship, as they notify the Miranda Warning. This interpretation is reasonable when the right of presence of persons with reliable relationship is recognized as the right of persons with disabilities. Lastly, interrogation during which the right of presence persons with reliable relationship is not protected or denied shall be illegal so that it can be excluded as evidences in court proceedings.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조국, "형사절차와 취약계층. in: 정신지체자: 정신장애－형사절차와 인권" 사람생각 37-70, 2003

2 배종대, "형사소송법" 홍문사 2004

3 차용석, "형사소송법" 세영사 2009

4 신양균, "형사소송법" 화산미디어 2009

5 이재상, "형사소송법" 박영사 2001

6 이영미, "형사사법절차상 장애인 피의자 차별과 인권보호에 관한 연구" 한국장애인복지학회 (9) : 77-111, 2008

7 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2006

8 국가인권위원회, "장애인차별금지법의 제정 의의와 장애인 정책의 방향(토론회 자료집)"

9 국가인권위원회, "장애인권리협약 해설집"

10 국가인권위원회, "장애인 차별실태 자료분석을 통한 인권의식 개선방안에 관한 연구" 2002

11 유동철, "인권 관점에서 보는 장애인 복지" 집문당 2009

12 신동운, "신형사소송법" 법문사 2009

13 "대법원 1990. 9. 28 선고 89누2493"

14 국제장애인권리조약한국추진연대, "국제장애인권리조약 의장안 검토 자료집"

15 국가인권위원회, "국가인권위원회법 해설집"

16 "국가인권위원회 2010. 1. 25. 결정, 09진차664 장애인 구속수사 과정에서의 차별(이하 인권위 2010. 1. 25.결정)"

17 법무부, "개정 형사소송법"

18 "Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care CG Adopted by General Assembly resolution 46/119 of 17 Dec. 1991"