RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      羅唐戰爭期 七重城과 買肖城 戰鬪 - 買肖城의 位置 比定 및 靺鞨 水軍의 活動에 대한 分析을 中心으로 -

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The battle of ‘Maeso’ Fortress has been paid attention in the study about during the Period of the War between Silla and T’ang dynasty in middle of 7th century. According to the Chinese records about the situation before the battle, it was mentioned that T"ang forces under the command of general Liu Rengui(劉仁軌) crossed the Limjin river, defeated the troops of Silla, and occupied the ‘Chiljung" Fortress. Also it was recorded that the troops of Malgal which was one of the tribe of the North-Western region of T’ang, advanced southward by ships. In other words, T’ang and Malgal were not separated troops that operated independently in the context of strategy, but a allied forces that advanced along both sides sea and land. As in the 『New Book of T"ang(新唐書)』, it is reasonable to assume that T’ang attacked the northern boundary of Silla.
      Therefore, it was so risky to carry out a operation under the condition of the limitation that Tang’s supply ship could advanced too far to east. It meaned that they had to take risk of run out of supplies. So then, the final landing place had to be as possible as close in with the ‘Chiljung’ Fortress. As the result, the landing place of Malgal had to be the place that a ship could enter, and It should be somewhere between the mouth of Limjin river and Gorangpo. The author pays attention to U-po, also called the castle site of Geumpa-ri. It is reasonable to assume the place was the place to load and keep combat strength and supplies, and the rear base for advancing to the Chiljung-seong Fortress.
      It is estimated that ‘Maeso’ Fortress was located in Yeoncheon or Yangju. If this fortress was located in Yeoncheon, it could be difficult to understand why the allied forces pulled out from the ‘Maeso’ Fortress and then marched to the ‘Chiljung’ Fortress in south. In other words, if the fortress was located in Yangju, it could be easy to understand the situations of battles that had happened while the allied forces was pulling out. Because it is possible to suppose the routes of retreat from various angles. This is the reason why the allied forces that advanced from north to south occupied the ‘Chiljung’ Fortress at first. A role of the ‘Chiljung’ Fortress is that it is easy to defend the uphill path of Seolma-ri that connected to a main road headed for Yangju and Han river.
      번역하기

      The battle of ‘Maeso’ Fortress has been paid attention in the study about during the Period of the War between Silla and T’ang dynasty in middle of 7th century. According to the Chinese records about the situation before the battle, it was menti...

      The battle of ‘Maeso’ Fortress has been paid attention in the study about during the Period of the War between Silla and T’ang dynasty in middle of 7th century. According to the Chinese records about the situation before the battle, it was mentioned that T"ang forces under the command of general Liu Rengui(劉仁軌) crossed the Limjin river, defeated the troops of Silla, and occupied the ‘Chiljung" Fortress. Also it was recorded that the troops of Malgal which was one of the tribe of the North-Western region of T’ang, advanced southward by ships. In other words, T’ang and Malgal were not separated troops that operated independently in the context of strategy, but a allied forces that advanced along both sides sea and land. As in the 『New Book of T"ang(新唐書)』, it is reasonable to assume that T’ang attacked the northern boundary of Silla.
      Therefore, it was so risky to carry out a operation under the condition of the limitation that Tang’s supply ship could advanced too far to east. It meaned that they had to take risk of run out of supplies. So then, the final landing place had to be as possible as close in with the ‘Chiljung’ Fortress. As the result, the landing place of Malgal had to be the place that a ship could enter, and It should be somewhere between the mouth of Limjin river and Gorangpo. The author pays attention to U-po, also called the castle site of Geumpa-ri. It is reasonable to assume the place was the place to load and keep combat strength and supplies, and the rear base for advancing to the Chiljung-seong Fortress.
      It is estimated that ‘Maeso’ Fortress was located in Yeoncheon or Yangju. If this fortress was located in Yeoncheon, it could be difficult to understand why the allied forces pulled out from the ‘Maeso’ Fortress and then marched to the ‘Chiljung’ Fortress in south. In other words, if the fortress was located in Yangju, it could be easy to understand the situations of battles that had happened while the allied forces was pulling out. Because it is possible to suppose the routes of retreat from various angles. This is the reason why the allied forces that advanced from north to south occupied the ‘Chiljung’ Fortress at first. A role of the ‘Chiljung’ Fortress is that it is easy to defend the uphill path of Seolma-ri that connected to a main road headed for Yangju and Han river.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 劉仁軌 唐軍과 靺鞨 水軍의 水陸竝進
      • 3. 靺鞨 水軍의 入江과 上陸地點 : 坡平 金坡里 城址
      • 4. 七重城을 根據地로 한 唐軍의 買肖城 掌握
      • 5. 泉城 水戰의 勝利와 李謹行의 買肖城 抛棄
      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 劉仁軌 唐軍과 靺鞨 水軍의 水陸竝進
      • 3. 靺鞨 水軍의 入江과 上陸地點 : 坡平 金坡里 城址
      • 4. 七重城을 根據地로 한 唐軍의 買肖城 掌握
      • 5. 泉城 水戰의 勝利와 李謹行의 買肖城 抛棄
      • 6. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 連川郡誌編纂委員會, "連川郡誌"

      2 김병희, "羅唐戰爭의 終了 始點에 대한 再檢討 및 買肖城 戰役의 過程 硏究" 한국고대사탐구학회 (30) : 185-244, 2018

      3 서영교, "羅唐戰爭期 唐邊方軍의 來襲과 李謹行" 42 : 19-57, 2006

      4 김병희, "羅唐戰爭期 七重城과 買肖城 戰鬪 -買肖城의 位置 比定 및 靺鞨 水軍의 活動에 대한分析을 中心으로-" 국방부군사편찬연구소 (118) : 45-95, 2021

      5 서영교, "羅唐戰爭史 硏究" 아세아문화사 2006

      6 徐仁漢, "羅唐戰爭史" 國防軍史硏究所 1999

      7 윤경진, "羅唐戰爭 終戰期 전황의 새로운 이해" 국방부군사편찬연구소 (104) : 251-290, 2017

      8 閔德植, "羅·唐戰爭에 관한 考察 - 買肖城(매소성) 전투를 중심으로" 40 : 145-198, 1989

      9 李根成, "羅·唐 격전지 買肖城<매소성>은 大田里산성"

      10 파주시, "파주시의 역사와 문화유적" 큰기획 1999

      1 連川郡誌編纂委員會, "連川郡誌"

      2 김병희, "羅唐戰爭의 終了 始點에 대한 再檢討 및 買肖城 戰役의 過程 硏究" 한국고대사탐구학회 (30) : 185-244, 2018

      3 서영교, "羅唐戰爭期 唐邊方軍의 來襲과 李謹行" 42 : 19-57, 2006

      4 김병희, "羅唐戰爭期 七重城과 買肖城 戰鬪 -買肖城의 位置 比定 및 靺鞨 水軍의 活動에 대한分析을 中心으로-" 국방부군사편찬연구소 (118) : 45-95, 2021

      5 서영교, "羅唐戰爭史 硏究" 아세아문화사 2006

      6 徐仁漢, "羅唐戰爭史" 國防軍史硏究所 1999

      7 윤경진, "羅唐戰爭 終戰期 전황의 새로운 이해" 국방부군사편찬연구소 (104) : 251-290, 2017

      8 閔德植, "羅·唐戰爭에 관한 考察 - 買肖城(매소성) 전투를 중심으로" 40 : 145-198, 1989

      9 李根成, "羅·唐 격전지 買肖城<매소성>은 大田里산성"

      10 파주시, "파주시의 역사와 문화유적" 큰기획 1999

      11 김덕원, "칠중성의 영유권 변천과 전략적 역할" 한국고대사탐구학회 (33) : 333-371, 2019

      12 이준선, "칠중성과 고랑포의 역사지리적 고찰" 31 : 151-194, 2005

      13 宮崎市定, "중국중세사" 신서원 1996

      14 노시경, "중국을 몰아낸 힘 - <서울 경기 역사기행 21> 양주 대모산성(大母山城)"

      15 이준선, "적성지역의 전략적 가치와 그 배경" 한국문화역사지리학회 16 (16): 1-18, 2004

      16 양주시, "양주대모산성(楊州大母山城) 국가지정문화재 지정 자료 보고서" 2012

      17 강경구, "신라의 북방 영토와 김유신" 학연문화사 2007

      18 許重權, "신라 통일전쟁사의 군사학적 연구" 韓國敎員大學校 大學院 1995

      19 서영일, "신라 육상 교통로 연구" 학연문화사 1999

      20 노태돈, "삼국통일전쟁사" 서울대학교출판부 2009

      21 김병희, "매소성 전투의 위치와 실상에 대한 고찰" 국방부군사편찬연구소 (91) : 195-228, 2014

      22 연천군, "대전리산성, 매초성인가" 2013

      23 강성문, "대전리산성"

      24 이상훈, "나당전쟁의 개전 시점과 주체에 대한 재검토-최근 대두되는 ‘신설’의 비판을 중심으로-" 한국고대사탐구학회 (32) : 547-565, 2019

      25 이상훈, "나당전쟁 연구" 주류성 2012

      26 권창혁, "나당전쟁 시기 매소성 전투와 신라의 북방전선" 한국고대사학회 (95) : 289-330, 2019

      27 김병희, "나당 전쟁기의 매소성 전투 연구 : 위치 비정과 675년의 전황 복원을 중심으로" 경기대학교 대학원 2012

      28 경기도박물관, "경기도 3대 하천유역 종합학술조사Ⅰ -임진강- Vol.2 문화유적(1)" 경기출판사 2001

      29 "資治通鑑"

      30 윤경진, "買肖城 전투와 羅唐戰爭의 종결 ― 『三國史記』 신라본기 675년 2월 기사의 분석 ―" 수선사학회 (60) : 155-193, 2017

      31 安國承, "買肖城 硏究" 2 : 261-291, 1997

      32 李恩影, "買肖城 位置 比定과 戰鬪 硏究" 한국교원대 2005

      33 "舊唐書"

      34 洪再善, "積城 七重城 調査略報" 7 : 13-31, 1983

      35 徐榮一, "漢江以北의 城址와 新羅의 防禦體制 - 坡州 地域을 中心으로" 10 : 75-93, 1998

      36 社團法人 楊州文化院, "楊州郡誌 上"

      37 文化財硏究所, "楊州大母山城 發掘報告書" 1990

      38 노혁진, "楊州 大母山城의 再照明" 한림대학교 출판부 2013

      39 "東史綱目"

      40 李昊榮, "新羅三國統合과 麗·濟敗亡原因硏究" 書景文化社 1997

      41 "新增東國輿地勝覽"

      42 "新唐書"

      43 抱川郡誌編纂委員會, "抱川郡誌"

      44 손보기박사 정년기념논총간행위원회, "孫寶基博士停年紀念 考古人類學論叢" 知識産業社 1988

      45 이상훈, "唐의 軍事戰略을 통해 본 羅唐戰爭期의 買肖城 戰鬪" 신라문화연구소 (29) : 4-4, 2007

      46 曹凌, "唐·新羅戰爭史 研究" 동국대 2019

      47 "册府元龜"

      48 陸軍士官學校 陸軍博物館, "京畿道 漣川郡 軍事遺蹟 地表調査 報告書" 1995

      49 陸軍士官學校 陸軍博物館, "京畿道 坡州郡 軍事遺蹟 地表調査 報告書" 1994

      50 李丙燾, "三國史記(國譯篇)" 乙酉文化社 1977

      51 "三國史記"

      52 권창혁, "7세기 후반 新羅의 對唐戰爭과 북방정책" 고려대 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2017-10-23 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Military History Institute, MND KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-06-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> military history KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.63 0.6 1.024 0.34
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼