Digital Tomosynthesis of the Chest: Comparison of Patient Exposure Dose and Image Quality between Standard Default Setting and Low Dose Setting

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: To determine the optimum low dose (LD) digital tomosynthesis (DT) setting, and to compared the image quality of the LD DT with that of the standard default (SD) DT.
Materials and Methods: Nine DT settings, by changing tube voltage, copper filter, and dose ratio, were performed for determining the LD setting. Among combinations of DT setting, a condition providing the lowest radiation dose was determined. Eighty artificial nodules less than 1 cm in diameter (subcentimeter nodules: 40, micronodules less than 4 mm: 40) were attached to a Styrofoam and a diaphragm of the phantom. Among these, 38 nodules were located at the periphery of the lung (thin area) and 42 nodules were located at the paravertebral or sub-diaphragmatic area (thick area). Four observers counted the number of nodules detected in the thick and thin areas. The detection sensitivity in SD and LD settings were calculated separately. Data were analyzed statistically.
Results: The lowest LD setting was a combination of 100 kVp, 0.3 mm additional copper filter, and a 1 : 5 dose ratio. The effective dose for the LD and SD settings were 62 μSv and 140 μSv, separately. A 56.7% dose reduction was achieved in the LD setting compared with the SD setting. Detection sensitivities were not different between the SD and the LD settings except between observers 1 and 2 for the detection of micronodules in the thick area.
Conclusion: LD DT can be effective in nodule detection bigger than 4 mm without a significant decrease in image quality compared with SD DT.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Quaia E, "The value of digital tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary lesions on chest radiography: analysis of diagnostic accuracy and confidence" 17 : 1267-1274, 2010

2 "The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103" 37 : 1-332, 2007

3 McCollough CH, "Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT" 47 : 27-40, 2009

4 Svalkvist A, "Simulation of dose reduction in tomosynthesis" 37 : 258-269, 2010

5 Aberle DR, "Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening" 365 : 395-409, 2011

6 Kim EY, "Pulmonary mycobacterial disease: diagnostic performance of low-dose digital tomosynthesis as compared with chest radiography" 257 : 269-277, 2010

7 MacMahon H, "Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society" 237 : 395-400, 2005

8 Båth M, "Effective dose to patients from chest examinations with tomosynthesis" 139 : 153-158, 2010

9 Carmichael JHE, "EUR 16260 - European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images" European Communities 1996

10 Dobbins JT 3rd, "Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential" 48 : R65-R106, 2003

11 Dobbins JT, "Digital tomosynthesis of the chest for lung nodule detection: interim sensitivity results from an ongoing NIHsponsored trial" 35 : 2554-2557, 2008

12 "Digital tomosynthesis for aortic arch calcification evaluation: performance comparison with chest radiography with CT as the reference standard" ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD 53 (53): 17-22, 2012

13 유진영, "Digital Tomosynthesis for PNS Evaluation: Comparisons of Patient Exposure and Image Quality with Plain Radiography" 대한영상의학회 13 (13): 136-143, 2012

14 Brenner DJ, "Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure" 357 : 2277-2284, 2007

15 Vikgren J, "Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases" 249 : 1034-1041, 2008

16 Dobbins JT 3rd, "Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update" 72 : 244-251, 2009

17 Dobbins JT 3rd, "Chest radiography: optimization of X-ray spectrum for cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector" 226 : 221-230, 2003

18 Hamer OW, "Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration" 237 : 691-700, 2005

19 Hall EJ, "Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology" 81 : 362-378, 2008

20 Sabol JM, "A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis" 36 : 5480-5487, 2009