‘明末小品’과 李贄散文의 ‘小品’적 특성 고찰 = A study on the Xiaopin-style characteristics of ‘Late Ming Essays’ and Li Zhi's Proses

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

If proses, which comprise most of modern writings, are western essays, ‘Xiaopin’ would be the equivalent of that for Chinese literature. Although ‘Xiaopin’ is less popular than main stream literary work such as poetry, novels and plays, the Chinese essay has not only greatly influenced China, but also Chosun. The prose influenced many Chosun writers such as Yeun-Am Pack Ji Won and was popular amongst various significant figures in the History of Korean-Chinse Literature. It later gave rise to the restoration of literary style. Afterwards, Xiaopin attracted attention in modern China by Lin yu-tang and Luxun’s Controversy of Xiaopin. The Late Ming Essays were a unique prose during the Ming Dynasty which was brought forward by the era's demands for the new. The characteristics of the content of the Late Ming Essays were the Pursuit of True Mind and Resistance whilst the characteristics of its form is that it was a free form of writing where there is a sense of humor or satire in the writing and that it may even use profane language. Although the Late Ming Essays are generally known to have begun during the Yuan Hong-da, this study sees Li Zhi's proses as its origin. This is because Li Zhi had directly affected and many of his literary characteristics conform to the characteristics of the Late Ming Essays. This study seeks to find Li Zhi as the writer who started a new style of writing and Li Zhi's phase as a Xiaopin writer in Chinese literature.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 林海權, "李贄年譜考略" 福建人民出版社 2005

2 李濟雨, "청대 『사고전서총목』을 통해 본 ‘만명소품’의 현상과 평가" 중국학연구회 26 : 2003

3 李濟雨, "중국현대문학소위 ‘소품문’" 중국학연구회 8 : 1993

4 김시준, "중국현대문학사" 지식산업사 2004

5 풍우란, "중국철학사" 까치 2002

6 김학주, "중국문학사" 신아사 2001

7 안대회, "조선후기 小品文의 실체" 태학사 2003

8 강명관, "문체와 국가장치: 정조의 문체반정을 둘러싼 사건들" 문학과경계사 2001

9 배영동, "명말청초사상" 민음사 1992

10 黃卓越, "閒雅文人小品集觀-明淸文人小品家五十家上 in: 文娛序" 百花洲文藝出版社 1996

11 金垠希, "論語派論爭에 關한 小考" 한국중국현대문학학회 (4) : 1990

12 李  贄, "焚書 in:續焚書" 漢京文化事業有限公司

13 郭预衡, "李贽在中国散文史上的位置" 社会科学版 2000

14 金聲振, "朝鮮後期小品體散文硏究" 부산대학교 1991

15 吴承学, "晚明小品研究心得-兼谈拙著『晚明小品研究" 古典文学知识 2000

16 李进立, "晚明小品文述略" 哲学社会科学版 2005

17 胡海琴, "晚明小品对传统散文的突破" 2008

18 黃宗羲, "明儒學案" 華世出版社 1987

19 李鐘周, "北學派 散文 硏究" 서강대학교 1990

20 주호림, "中國資本主義 萌芽論爭에 關한 小考" 연세대학교 1985

21 曺永祿, "中國 近世 知性의 理念과 運動" 지식산업사 2002

22 李濟雨, "‘만명소품’의 문학이상" 중국학연구회 30 : 2004

23 李濟雨, "‘晩明小品’ 창작의 이론 배경과 실천" 한국중어중문학회 33 : 441-470, 2003

24 李濟雨, "‘晩明小品’ 批評의 歷史" 한국중어중문학회 31 : 287-310, 2002

25 李濟雨, "1930년대 ‘소품문논쟁’을 통해서 본 만명소품의 인식과 평가" 중국학연구회 18 : 1996

26 이제우, "16-7세기 간 중국 소품(문)과 서구 에세이의 초보형식 비교" 중국어문논역학회 22 (22): 143-171, 2008