RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영상녹화물의 증거능력 = 법무부 형사소송법개정안을 중심으로

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The new revision of Criminal Procedure Code was proposed to Korean National Assembly by the Ministry of Justice on July 4, 2011. It allows that the Visual Recording can be used as a independent evidence of prosecutory authorties(Article of 312) and a peaching evidence(Article of 318 2). And it gives the right of request for the videotaping interrogaton to a suspect and a reference(Article of 244 2 (1)). This revision of the Code was regarded as appropriate because the Video Recording should be admissible in trial, in respect that it could be new evidence to protect the hunman right of a suspect and to correspond with the principle of discovering substancial truth. It was expected that the heated dabate over admissibility of the Visual Recording which argued till now, in spite of enforcing of the current Criminal Procedure Code, could be ended by proposing the revision code of the Ministry of Justice, however this revision Code was abrogated because of ending of Assembly Session. However, it is expected that the working for the amendment will be continue to make an end of this argument, so it is significant in respect this revision code became a new standard for the forward legislative object.
    번역하기

    The new revision of Criminal Procedure Code was proposed to Korean National Assembly by the Ministry of Justice on July 4, 2011. It allows that the Visual Recording can be used as a independent evidence of prosecutory authorties(Article of 312) and a ...

    The new revision of Criminal Procedure Code was proposed to Korean National Assembly by the Ministry of Justice on July 4, 2011. It allows that the Visual Recording can be used as a independent evidence of prosecutory authorties(Article of 312) and a peaching evidence(Article of 318 2). And it gives the right of request for the videotaping interrogaton to a suspect and a reference(Article of 244 2 (1)). This revision of the Code was regarded as appropriate because the Video Recording should be admissible in trial, in respect that it could be new evidence to protect the hunman right of a suspect and to correspond with the principle of discovering substancial truth. It was expected that the heated dabate over admissibility of the Visual Recording which argued till now, in spite of enforcing of the current Criminal Procedure Code, could be ended by proposing the revision code of the Ministry of Justice, however this revision Code was abrogated because of ending of Assembly Session. However, it is expected that the working for the amendment will be continue to make an end of this argument, so it is significant in respect this revision code became a new standard for the forward legislative object.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 법무부개정안의 주요내용
    • Ⅲ. 영상녹화물의 본증화
    • Ⅳ. 영상녹화물의 탄핵증거 허용
    • Ⅴ. 영상녹화조사신청권
    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 법무부개정안의 주요내용
    • Ⅲ. 영상녹화물의 본증화
    • Ⅳ. 영상녹화물의 탄핵증거 허용
    • Ⅴ. 영상녹화조사신청권
    • Ⅵ. 선별적 영상녹화의 규제방안
    • Ⅶ. 결언
    • 【참고문헌】
    • 【Abstract】
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼