RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    계몽의 재개념화에 기초한 공교육 담론 = Reconstruction of Public Education Discourse Based On Reconceptualization of Enlightenment

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77021348

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Public education was based on metanarratives of enlightenment that was to develop rationality in all by overcoming ignorance and superstition with the guidance of reason, Based on enlightenment discourse, aim of education was supposed to produce a rational human. The contemporary crisis of public education is, however, attributed mainly to the decline of metanarratives, instrumental use of reason, and overly dependence on logic of capital. In "postmodern era" we need to generate a public education discourse counted on contextual rationality by transgressing the 'self-evident' logics based on scientific method and knowledge, Also, we should make a distinction between a theory of enlightenment as an outline of a transcendental project and a critical enlightenment attitude. The concept that sees enlightenment as a attitude enables us to reconceptualize enlightenment and encourages us to include a variety of discourses into a school curriculum. This "permanent reactivation" project contributes to reconstruct public education discourse in terms of not a universal consensus but a historic research. In addition, we need normative criteria such as justice and freedom to give the oppressed voices a various opportunity to preset their experiences and stories in the educational context. In conclusion, public education in postmodern era, I hope, is one that welcomes various discourses and knowledges at school, considering enlightenment not a mode or an era but a critical attitude.
    번역하기

    Public education was based on metanarratives of enlightenment that was to develop rationality in all by overcoming ignorance and superstition with the guidance of reason, Based on enlightenment discourse, aim of education was supposed to produce a rat...

    Public education was based on metanarratives of enlightenment that was to develop rationality in all by overcoming ignorance and superstition with the guidance of reason, Based on enlightenment discourse, aim of education was supposed to produce a rational human. The contemporary crisis of public education is, however, attributed mainly to the decline of metanarratives, instrumental use of reason, and overly dependence on logic of capital. In "postmodern era" we need to generate a public education discourse counted on contextual rationality by transgressing the 'self-evident' logics based on scientific method and knowledge, Also, we should make a distinction between a theory of enlightenment as an outline of a transcendental project and a critical enlightenment attitude. The concept that sees enlightenment as a attitude enables us to reconceptualize enlightenment and encourages us to include a variety of discourses into a school curriculum. This "permanent reactivation" project contributes to reconstruct public education discourse in terms of not a universal consensus but a historic research. In addition, we need normative criteria such as justice and freedom to give the oppressed voices a various opportunity to preset their experiences and stories in the educational context. In conclusion, public education in postmodern era, I hope, is one that welcomes various discourses and knowledges at school, considering enlightenment not a mode or an era but a critical attitude.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 계몽적 공교육 담론의 의미
    • Ⅲ. 계몽적 공교육 담론 비판
    • Ⅳ. 계몽적 공교육 담론의 재구성
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 계몽적 공교육 담론의 의미
    • Ⅲ. 계몽적 공교육 담론 비판
    • Ⅳ. 계몽적 공교육 담론의 재구성
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 심성보, "현대사회의 변화와 ‘공교육’사상의 재정립" 6 : 249-266, 1994

    2 Cherryholmes, C. H, "탈구조주의 교육과정 탐구" 교육과학사 1998

    3 정호표, "지식의 구성적 관점과 학교교육" 한국교육철학회 18 : 2000

    4 정유성, "사람 삶 되살림" 한울 아카데미 1994

    5 김기수, "근대적 교육이념에 대한 포스트모던적 담론의 난점" 34 (34): 25-42, 1996

    6 이혜영, "교육이란 무엇인가" 한길사 1990

    7 Kant,I, "What is Enlightenment? Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals" Bobbs-Merrill 1959

    8 Foucault,M, "What is Enlightenment. The Foucault Reader" Pantheon 1984

    9 Nuyen,A.T, "Postmodern Education as Sublimation" 46 (46): 93-103, 1996

    10 Kiziltan, M.U, "Postmodern Condition: Rethinking Public Education" 40 (40): 351-369, 1990

    1 심성보, "현대사회의 변화와 ‘공교육’사상의 재정립" 6 : 249-266, 1994

    2 Cherryholmes, C. H, "탈구조주의 교육과정 탐구" 교육과학사 1998

    3 정호표, "지식의 구성적 관점과 학교교육" 한국교육철학회 18 : 2000

    4 정유성, "사람 삶 되살림" 한울 아카데미 1994

    5 김기수, "근대적 교육이념에 대한 포스트모던적 담론의 난점" 34 (34): 25-42, 1996

    6 이혜영, "교육이란 무엇인가" 한길사 1990

    7 Kant,I, "What is Enlightenment? Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals" Bobbs-Merrill 1959

    8 Foucault,M, "What is Enlightenment. The Foucault Reader" Pantheon 1984

    9 Nuyen,A.T, "Postmodern Education as Sublimation" 46 (46): 93-103, 1996

    10 Kiziltan, M.U, "Postmodern Condition: Rethinking Public Education" 40 (40): 351-369, 1990

    11 Usher, R, "Postmoderism and Education" Routledge 1994

    12 Foucault,M, "Madness and Civilization" Vintage 1965

    13 McNay,L, "Foucault: A Critical Introduction" Polity Press 1994

    14 McCarty,L.R, "Experience and Postmodern Spirit" 47 (47): 377-394, 1997

    15 Smeyers,P, "Education and the Educational Project Ⅰ: the atmosphere of post-modernism" 29 (29): 33-43, 1995

    16 Carr,W, "Education and Democracy: confronting the postmodernist challenge" 29 (29): 75-91, 1995

    17 Spring,J, "A Primer of Liberation Education" Free Life Edition 1975

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.61 0.998 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼