A Reexamination of Dispersion in Analysts’ Forecasts and Future Stock Returns

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  This paper reexamines the negative association between dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts and future returns. Diether, Malloy, and Scherbina (2002) attribute this relation to the heterogeneous expectations hypothesis proposed by Miller (1977). In this paper, I reexamine the validity of the Miller (1977) model for the relation between forecast dispersion and future returns and provide an alternative explanation (i.e., analysts’ self-selection hypothesis) for the observationally equivalent phenomenon. Consistent with recent research, I find that high dispersion stocks are overvalued relative to low dispersion stocks over the period 1984-1999. I expect that under the heterogeneous expectations hypothesis, changes in dispersion will be negatively associated with returns. Furthermore, the negative relation is more likely to be pronounced for the group of firms with severe short-sale constraints. By contrast, under the self-censoring hypothesis, higher forecast dispersion is likely to be associated with higher stopped coverage and deteriorating future performance.<BR>  Using a sample of 35,599 firm years over the period of 1984 ？ 1999 in the US, I investigate whether stock returns are consistent with the predictions of the heterogeneous expectations hypothesis. I find evidence inconsistent with the heterogeneous expectations hypothesis. Changes in dispersion do not differentiate future returns. The level of dispersion in analysts’ forecasts appears “sticky” from period to period so that changes in dispersion do not drive the overvaluation of firms. I also find that the negative relation between dispersion in forecasts and returns holds irrespective of short-sales constraints. Instead, my evidence is consistent with the assertion that analyst self-selection plays a role in the association between dispersion in forecasts and returns. Consistent with the selection explanation, I find that high dispersion firms are more likely to have upward bias and right-skewed forecasts. Also those high dispersion firms experience a significantly lower analyst coverage and higher incidence of delistings than low dispersion firms. More important, I find that the relation between analyst forecast dispersion and future returns disappears once I control for proxies for selfcensoring (i.e., future profitability or stopped coverage).<BR>  Taken as a whole, the results of this paper are consistent with the view that the negative relation between dispersion and future returns is due to the effective overvaluation that results from the analyst self-selection phenomenon. In addition, this paper suggests that high dispersion in forecasts is informative about the degree of self-selection by analysts. Investors may use the dispersion of forecasts to undo the bias from self-selection. Given the increased importance of security analysts, coupled with the introduction of short-sales transactions in Korea, I am hoping that this study sheds light on the effect of security analysts’ forecasts and short-sales constraints on stock valuations.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Danielsen, B., "Why do option introductions depress stock prices?" 36 : 451-484, 2001

2 Shalen, C. T., "Volume, volatility, and the dispersion of belief" 6 : 405-434, 1993

3 Garfinkel, J. A., "Volume, opinion divergence, and returns: A study of post-earnings announcement drift" 44 : 85-112, 2006

4 Barron, O., "Using analysts’ forecasts to measure properties of analysts’ information environment" 73 : 421-433, 1998

5 Gehardt, W., "Toward an ex ante cost of capital" 135-176, 2001

6 Figlewski, S., "The informational effects of restrictions on short-sales: Some empirical evidence" 16 : 463-476, 1981

7 Brown, L., "The impact of annual earnings announcements on convergence of beliefs" 862-875, 1992

8 Imhoff, E., "The effect of ex ante earnings uncertainty on earnings response coefficients" 67 : 427-439, 1992

9 Stickel, S., "The determinants of convergence of opinion at earnings Announce- ments" 141-154, 1996

10 Fama, E. F., "The cross-section of expected stock returns" 47 : 427-466, 1992

11 Harrison, J., "Speculative investor behavior in a stock market with heterogeneous expectations" 92 : 323-336, 1978

12 McNichols, M., "Self-selection and analysts’ coverage" 167-199, 1997

13 Miller, E., "Risk, uncertainty and divergence of opinion" 32 : 1151-1168, 1977

14 Moses, D., "On bankruptcy indicators from analysts’ earnings forecasts" 379-404, 1990

15 Hwang, L., "Loss firms and analysts’ earnings forecast errors" 18-30, 1996

16 Maddala, G., "Limited Dependent Variables Methods" 1983

17 Johnson, T., "Forecast dispersion and the cross-section of expected returns" 59 : 1957-1978, 2004

18 Cragg, J. G., "Expectations and the structure of share prices" University of Chicago Press 1982

19 La Porta, R., "Expectations and the cross-section of stock returns" 51 : 1715-1742, 1996

20 Bernard, V., "Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings" 13 : 305-340, 1990

21 Varian, H. R., "Divergence of opinion in complete markets: A note" 40 : 309-317, 1985

22 Houge, T., "Divergence of opinion in IPOs" The University of Iowa

23 Givoly, D., "Divergence of earnings expectations: The effect of market response to earnings signal" Cambridge University 1987

24 Barron and Stuerke, "Dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts as a measure of Uncertainty" 245-270, 1996

25 Harris, M., "Differences of opinion make a horse race" 6 : 473-506, 1993

26 Diether, K., "Differences of opinion and the cross-section of stock returns" 57 : 2113-2141, 2002

27 Reed, W., "Costly short-selling and stock price adjustments to earnings Announcements" University of Pennsylvania 2007

28 Lakonishok, J., "Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk" 49 : 1541-1578, 1994

29 Johnson, N., "Continuous univariate" Houghton Mifflin 1970

30 Diamond, D., "Constraints on short-selling and asset price adjustment to private information" 18 : 277-312, 1987

31 Chen, J., "Breadth of ownership and stock returns" 116 : 261-292, 2002

32 Kothari, S., "Another look at the cross-section of expected stock returns" 50 : 185-224, 1995

33 Ang, J., "Analyst forecasts and stock returns" Florida State University 2001

34 Ciccone, "Analyst forecast properties, financial distress, and business risk" University of New Hampshire 2001

35 Desai, H., "An inves- tigation of the informational role of short interest in the Nasdaq market" 57 : 2263-2287, 2002

36 Brennan, M., "Alternative factor speci- fications, security characteristics, and the cross-section of expected stock returns" 49 : 345-373, 1998

37 Frankel R., "Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross- sectional stock returns" 25 : 282-319, 1998