RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국정감사ㆍ조사제도의 재조명

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76451644

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Under the Article 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea, the National Assembly is authorized to Inspect affairs of state regularly and to Investigate specific matters of state affairs. The regular inspection of state affairs is conducted once a year during the ordinary session of the National Assembly. whereas the Investigation of a specific matter of state affairs may take place when deemed necessary The regular Inspection of state affairs by the legislative branch is quite unique. in that no comparable Instrument can be found in other countries As a means to carry out Inspection or Investigation. the National Assembly may demand production of documents and appearance of witnesses This paper first briefly reviews how the two Instruments were Incorporated Into the current Constitution, and how they are conducted The paper then examines some problems related to the Institution. followed by some suggestions on ways to address them. which boll down to the following points'
    First. each parliamentary committee must cut down the number of government organizations under Inspection To date. far too many organizations have been subject to Inspection that lasts less than 20 days each year
    Second. each parliamentary committee must take steps to minimize the amount of documents demanded of each government agencies
    Third. the Inspection outcome of a specific government entity must be reviewed as a reference point for the Inspection of the same entity the following year, to check whether the policy suggestions of the previous year have been effectively put in place
    Fourth. minority parties should also be allowed to summon witnesses of their own during the investigation of a specific matter At least a day during the committee hearing schedule should be dedicated to minority parties for this purpose,
    Fifth. the National Assembly should take measures to ensure that witnesses tell the truth at committee hearings In this vein. the court must be stricter in punishing witnesses indicted for absence or for not telling the truth before a committee hearing
    Sixth. the National Assembly should be allowed enough discretion in setting the boundaries of parliamentary investigative power. in case the matter In question is also under the investigation by the prosecution
    번역하기

    Under the Article 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea, the National Assembly is authorized to Inspect affairs of state regularly and to Investigate specific matters of state affairs. The regular inspection of state affairs is conducted onc...

    Under the Article 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea, the National Assembly is authorized to Inspect affairs of state regularly and to Investigate specific matters of state affairs. The regular inspection of state affairs is conducted once a year during the ordinary session of the National Assembly. whereas the Investigation of a specific matter of state affairs may take place when deemed necessary The regular Inspection of state affairs by the legislative branch is quite unique. in that no comparable Instrument can be found in other countries As a means to carry out Inspection or Investigation. the National Assembly may demand production of documents and appearance of witnesses This paper first briefly reviews how the two Instruments were Incorporated Into the current Constitution, and how they are conducted The paper then examines some problems related to the Institution. followed by some suggestions on ways to address them. which boll down to the following points'
    First. each parliamentary committee must cut down the number of government organizations under Inspection To date. far too many organizations have been subject to Inspection that lasts less than 20 days each year
    Second. each parliamentary committee must take steps to minimize the amount of documents demanded of each government agencies
    Third. the Inspection outcome of a specific government entity must be reviewed as a reference point for the Inspection of the same entity the following year, to check whether the policy suggestions of the previous year have been effectively put in place
    Fourth. minority parties should also be allowed to summon witnesses of their own during the investigation of a specific matter At least a day during the committee hearing schedule should be dedicated to minority parties for this purpose,
    Fifth. the National Assembly should take measures to ensure that witnesses tell the truth at committee hearings In this vein. the court must be stricter in punishing witnesses indicted for absence or for not telling the truth before a committee hearing
    Sixth. the National Assembly should be allowed enough discretion in setting the boundaries of parliamentary investigative power. in case the matter In question is also under the investigation by the prosecution

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국의회정치론" 오름 2003

    2 "최신 국회법" 박영사 2004

    3 "종이없는 국회, 이렇게 시작된다" 2003년

    4 "제16대 국회 중간평가 : 국정감사" (13) : 2002

    5 "정치개혁의 입법적 과제" 21 : 2001

    6 "의회조사권에 관한 비교법적 연구 -우리나라 국정조사권의 활성화를 위하여" 1995

    7 "세계를 움직이는 미국의회』," 한울아카데미 2000

    8 "박종흡"제16대 국회 하반기평가 : 국정감사"" (16) : 2003

    9 "국정감사ㆍ조사와 청문회" 법문사 1990

    10 "The American Legislative Process" Prentice Hall 1993

    1 "한국의회정치론" 오름 2003

    2 "최신 국회법" 박영사 2004

    3 "종이없는 국회, 이렇게 시작된다" 2003년

    4 "제16대 국회 중간평가 : 국정감사" (13) : 2002

    5 "정치개혁의 입법적 과제" 21 : 2001

    6 "의회조사권에 관한 비교법적 연구 -우리나라 국정조사권의 활성화를 위하여" 1995

    7 "세계를 움직이는 미국의회』," 한울아카데미 2000

    8 "박종흡"제16대 국회 하반기평가 : 국정감사"" (16) : 2003

    9 "국정감사ㆍ조사와 청문회" 법문사 1990

    10 "The American Legislative Process" Prentice Hall 1993

    11 "Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process" 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.02 1.02 0.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.89 0.87 0.967 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼